Which is better to buy 5230 vs 5320

5230 recommended! The 5320 screen is too small to look bad for the eye. And now there is a dedicated full-touch input software that can type faster than a keyboard!

Besides, the 5230 big screen, watching movies, and surfing the Internet are very cool! It is incomparable to 5320 when used to take pictures! There is also 5320 that looks stingy.

5230 is much more generous, and the 5320 keys are too hard, and the light leakage is very serious'''The outside is very loud and there is a murmur; Anyway, the full touch screen is the mainstream now, and it looks good no matter what the woman holds''''

5320 can be said to be a piece of garbage, upstairs only says how good is the software of 5320, why don't you talk about hardware? It's better to buy a notebook than software.

5230 has been used for less than a month, and the response is very slow In the speechless, my classmate is this.

Coincidentally, I also have a classmate's mobile phone is 5320, except for the small screen, the others are OK, the price is less than 1000, it's OK It's too old.

Highly recommended5320xm、、The landlord's eyesight is good,Both machines are very cost-effective,My 5320 has been used for more than a year,It's really good,A fly in the ointment is that the sound quality of the external amplifier is not very good,There is a broken sound,But after bringing the headphones,All the problems are all solved,But it's perfect、..

To put it simply, Nokia's touch screen is too bad, there is little software, the screen response speed is slow, it is easy to crash, or 5320, this mobile phone has a small problem, that is, it occasionally has a black screen, but it is not a crash, but the background light is not on, and it will be lit up by calling your own mobile phone, which can be solved through settings: Settings - mobile phone settings - general - personalized selection - screen display - screen protection - screen protection time - always, this phone is very good, I have played 500m's "Thor's Hammer", and 20m's " The Way of Heaven and Earth", 23m's "Lonely Island Tragedy" can run smoothly.

5230 is nearly 200 yuan more expensive than 5233, and the main gap is that 5230 supports WCDMA 3G network and GPS positioning function. It depends on how often you use the 3G network and GPS positioning function. If you use it often, it is recommended to buy 5230

The V5 system used by both mobile phones is now very scalable, and although the promise has come to an end, the support of the third party is still very thick.

It's better not to buy this kind of Nokia now, I really have to buy my personal recommendation 5233, because it's much cheaper.

The 5230 has GPS positioning.

It's still so expensive, it's not cost-effective.

The hardware parameters are the same, and 5233 is a customized machine of Unicom.

5233 is cost-effective, 5230 with a GPS, the two machines are almost the same, 5233 is recommended

5230, of course

The 5233 is a scaled-down version of the 5230.

Less 3G and GPS

But two or three hundred cheaper.

Of course, 5230 is a 3G mobile phone, there is GPS, and other parameters are the same for both mobile phones, 5230 is recommended. But if you play games, you'd better sell Android, it's good to play. Or an iPhone

Nonsense of course 5230, 5233 what a rotten phone, not at all popular with the public.

The function and hardware configuration are the same, the only biggest difference is that 5230 supports 3G5233 does not support, remember to adopt

5233** is cheaper than 5230** 400 to 500, 5230 function is better than 5233, it is 3G, it is a smart phone, there is a navigation function, 5233 is not 3G, there is no navigation function,

If the landlord does not use 3G and GPS, it is best to buy 5233, which is more cost-effective than 5230. As for the short data line, this.

It's the essence, and now Nokia's data cables are **, normal, so it's not easy to break.

I recommend you to buy 5230 is the best.

3G is the future, and practicality is more than money, and you have to play first.

But I personally think that if you buy a machine, it's better to spend more than 5800

Of course, it's 5230,5233 is the 5230 shrink version,It's Nokia's fifth version of the most garbage mobile phone,Also known as the entry machine,It mainly shrinks and doesn't support 3G Internet access,And the thickness is thicker than 52301 3 or so。

5230 is a 3G smartphone that supports 3G, and 5233 is a smartphone. 5230 has one more navigation than 5233. So 5230 is good.

It depends on the individual needs:

Differences in models. And a reminder to you.

Nokia [comes with your own headphones] is quite poor.

Listen**Remember to be sure to [change a pair]!!

Don't forget!! Nokia listen**Change headphones]!!

5230 water.

One more feature is better than one less.

The data cable is short. Parallel imports do not have data cables.

I bought parallel goods.

There is no data cable.

If you buy one, it's a matter of a few bucks.

So there's no need to dwell on it.

You should still be cautious when flashing the European version.

If you don't get it right, it will become English.

The 5233 is a scaled-down version of the 5230, which supports 3G networks and comes with its own navigation function. And 5233 does not have these two items.

The configuration of the 5230 and 5233 is the same. There are more 5233 on the National Bank that can be connected to the 3G network function, and parallel imports are the opposite of 5233 without 3G function, 5230 is recommended, European water is cheaper than the National Bank, and if you buy the original Finnish factory or made in Germany, it is more than the National Bank.

5233 doesn't have 3g, if you plan to use 3g, don't use 5233! 5230 has a navigation function, there is not much difference between the two mobile phones, and 5233 is a little cheaper.

It depends on which one you like, the latter two are not as popular as the first, the first one is the first touch bottle of Nuoji, and the performance is good in all aspects.

I think that no matter the price, appearance and performance, the 5230 is not as good as the 5530 and the 5800

Personally, I prefer 5800

It is recommended that you use the 5800xm version.

It is an enhanced version of the 5800, and the system configuration is relatively mature.

Very good value for money.

To be precise, 5800 is good, the latter are all shrunken versions! However, the 5530 is cost-effective.

The 5800i and 5800n may be available by the end of the year, but they may be on the expensive side.

Hehe, landlord.

5800 good!

You can see it from the ** and parameters

Of course, if you say cost-effective or something, it must be 5230, I used 5230, I bought it, because it is a student, poor money!

If it's not bad for a few hundred dollars, the landlord, buy 5800

5230 cheap.

The 5530 is small.

5800 Noble.

Nothing to say!