Ofo founders collect another consumption restriction order, is it useful to return the deposit?

There is a certain promotion effect, but the effect is not necessarily very good, and it is still necessary to protect rights through legal channels.

The founder of ofo then collects a consumption restriction order, which is useful for repaying the deposit, because the founder of ofo has the problem of arrears, but it has not risen to the legal level, so the impact is not particularly large.

The founder of ofo collects a consumption restriction order, which is actually useful for deposits, and it can also protect people's rights, which is a better measure.

It shouldn't be of any use, after all, it has been restricted from spending, so there will be no such thing as a return of deposit.

The founder of ofo collected the consumption restriction order, I think this does not have much effect on the return of the deposit, because the consumption restriction is for him personally, and now the business situation of ofo is very poor, if the business situation is not improved, it is just a restriction on consumption, for a huge deposit, this is just a drop in the bucket.

I think the consumption restriction order only has an impact on him personally, restricting his high consumption, and it does not have much impact on the deposit on the platform, and the refund of the deposit still has to wait for the platform to deal with it.

It's useless, because he has no money, and no matter how much he restricts, he can't afford to pay the deposit.

The ofo founder then collects a spending restriction order, which is not useful for repaying the deposit, because the founder does not have enough funds to repay the deposit.

I don't think it's useful, because the deposit has been delayed for many years, and he still hasn't returned it to us, which means that he has no intention of returning the deposit.

No, because the founder is restricted from spending, but it does not affect him to use other ways to spend, so he will not return the deposit.

Recently, the news that "the founder of ofo was restricted from consumption" has aroused heated discussions among the majority of netizens, and there has been a lot of uproar on the Internet. We know that with the development of society, people's travel methods are becoming more and more abundant, in the past few years, it has invented a very convenient service such as sharing bicycles, at the beginning, the most powerful has to belong to ofo, ofo small yellow cars are everywhere, and the market share is very high. However, due to the poor management of ofo, there are a large number of abandoned bicycles in many places.

Recently, the founder of ofo has also been restricted from high consumption.

One. The Ofo dynasty falls.

ofo, because it was exposed before that the deposit could not be refunded, and many people heard about this situation, and the rapid fission spread, resulting in a lot of people to return the deposit, but many have not been able to withdraw until this year, and a large number of deposits cannot be returned. <>

Two. The post-bike-sharing era.

Later, there are shared bicycles that do not require a deposit such as green oranges and small blue bicycles, and the transportation of these bicycles is relatively good, and the lessons of ofo have been learned. <>

Three. Whether a similar situation occurs.

So has there been a situation like this that has been restricted from high consumption before? It has appeared, and now it is very frequent, this restriction on high consumption is mainly caused by the fact that these people owe money and do not pay it back, which is a "laid-back" situation. The people who have been restricted from excessive consumption include Wang Jianlin's son Wang Sicong, as well as Luo Yonghao, the founder of Hammer Technology, and it is also because of the debt owed by Hammer Technology before, which has led to the restriction of high consumption for a while, and he can't take a plane, and his children can't go to a good private school.

Yes, Xiao Huangche has been sued by many companies one after another, and has been listed as a person subject to execution in many cases, and he has been restricted from spending many times.

A similar situation has not been seen before. However, there must be a reason why big bosses like this are restricted from spending.

A similar situation must have happened before, because he owes a large amount of debt and does not pay it, so it is reasonable to be restricted from spending.

Since the end of 2018, ofo has been sued by many companies, and has been listed as a list of executors in many cases. Therefore, the founder Dai Wei also began to receive consumption restriction orders constantly.

For example, in terms of travel, airplanes, high-speed rail, and bullet trains are all high consumption. Ordinary trains can be sitted, high-end products can be purchased, and high-end places cannot be entered.

It should be the business class when taking the plane and the first-class seat when taking the high-speed rail, etc., which are all high consumption.

Recently, Dai Wei, the founder of ofo, was officially restricted from consumption by the Haidian District Court in Beijing for defaulting on the payment of goods. Under a paper restriction on consumption, airplanes, high-speed rail, tourism, and houses all said goodbye. Far more serious than the personal crisis, ofo's stable user base collapsed overnight.

As of December 18, 2018, the number of users queuing up to refund their deposits has exceeded 10 million. If calculated at 99 yuan per person, ofo's debt alone is as high as 100 million yuan, not to mention that a considerable number of people's deposits are 199 yuan.

This means that Ofo is just one step away from bankruptcy.

Some people say that the deposit is on the account, and it will be returned directly, isn't it over?

The little yellow car shuttling around the city, why is it said that yellow is yellow? <>

Since its establishment in 2015, ofo has received a total of 12 rounds of investment in the past three years, with a financing amount of up to 15 billion yuan. In March 2018, ofo was valued at US$3 billion (nearly 20 billion yuan), and the founder Dai Wei's net worth exceeded 3.5 billion yuan, making him on the Hurun Young Rich List. <>

Seeing him raise Zhu Lou, seeing him feasting guests, and seeing his building collapse, it was appropriate for Kong Shangren to give Dai Wei the comments in "Peach Blossom Fan".

There is no shortage of reviewers for the story of ups and downs, in order to restore a "Entrepreneurial Apocalypse" from the causes and consequences of the collapse of the empire. <

Factional struggles, changes at the top, and corruption have all been one of the killers of ofo, but these diseases have not hit the nail on the head, as Ma Huateng said: "None of the recent analysis (ofo) articles have mentioned the real cause." ”

Ma Huateng: This is a lesson worth 20 billion.

On December 20, in a discussion of "who killed ofo" in the circle of friends, Ma Huateng pointed out a truth: "veto right".

You won't be able to fly. Because the relevant departments restricted the party's behavior of taking the plane in order to prevent him from fleeing.

You are not allowed to take airplanes and high-speed trains, you are not allowed to go to high-end places for consumption, you are not allowed to buy real estate and houses, and you are not allowed to buy large insurance.

His own travel will definitely be greatly affected, first of all, he can't take planes and high-speed trains, which restricts some of his outings.

There shall be no high-consumption and non-essential consumption behaviors for life and work, including: choosing second-class or higher cabins on airplanes, trains, and ships when traveling, taking all seats on G-shaped EMU trains and first-class or above seats on other EMU trains, leasing high-end office buildings, hotels, apartments and other places for office, etc.

My deposit has not been processed until nowAccording to the company's current refund progress, I don't think my deposit will be refunded for 5 years.

The vast majority of people pay a deposit in this company is actually no more than 200 yuan, I think this can only be regarded as a person's growth lesson, for any future deposit and project is best not to participate. There is no way for large companies to deliver on their promises, not to mention that for some other small companies, it is actually not ***.

It has been refunded, and after a long time, the deposit has been refunded. I didn't have any hope anymore, I didn't expect a refund.

My little yellow car deposit hasn't been lined up yet. Ofo bike sharing is convenient, fast and environmentally friendly, and has become an important means of transportation for me to go out. I hope that ofo shared bicycles will hold up.

A: No, because the number of small yellow cars is relatively large, it is impossible to line up my little yellow car all at once.

Personally, I think it is still unknown when the deposit will be returned to your hand, and there is only one way to wait at present.

There used to be a king in the field of shared bicycles, and that was ofo。In the past two years, its market share has surpassed that of Mobike and Harrow, and it has also appeared abroad, causing a heated discussion. But things are wrong, and now ofo has gone out of business, so has everyone's deposit been returned?

Mine is not there anyway.

Where did ofo go? When will I get my money? Do you have to get your money back?

The deposit refund time of the small yellow car is far away, no one can be sure when it can be fully refunded, the founder has lost credibility, I also have a deposit of 99 yuan has not been refunded, has been in line.

I don't think it will be returned, we have been waiting for several years, and he still hasn't got this thing right. There are so many people waiting to pay them back one by one, and this amount is too large.

It is impossible to return the consumption deposit, after all, the boss is bankrupt and has no money at all.

There is no return, because now the founder of Little Yellow has been restricted from consumption, and we will all have an impact for a long time, so there is no return.

I didn't pay a deposit when I rode the bike, so I didn't have to worry about it.

No, I still did it in Shanghai in 2016, and I left and didn't do it.

Returned, so it felt amazing, almost lost money.

I am back, and I didn't often ride a small yellow bike before, I feel that it is better to have a Harrow bicycle, there is no deposit, and it is also very secure.

Returned, there is no need to use such a product now, and now there is a certain problem with the shared bicycle, so it will not be used.

My bike-sharing deposit has been refunded and there is no financial loss.

In real life, it is common to see cases in which economic disputes are not effectively mediated and resorted to the courts. Even after the court decides to win the lawsuit, the creditor still can't get back the money that belongs to him, because there is no fund in the name of the person subject to enforcement in the court's inquiry results, and he really can't take out the money to repay the debt. This kind of creditor only won the lawsuit but did not help, and spent a lot of time, energy and financial resources.

There was an old man who owed 10,000 yuan to others and did not pay it back, and was sued by the creditor to the court. After the court ruled in favor of the creditor, the debtor was required to return the arrears, but he still did not pay, and the creditor directly applied to the court for enforcement, and finally the court included him in the list of restricted high-spending personnel. A few years later, the man who owed money wanted to get married, but found that he could not get a bank loan to buy a house on the list of restricted high-spending people, so he was so anxious that he rushed to return the money.

It is very likely that there are a lot of debts owed or a lot of debts on the part of the company, so there are certain restrictions on the behavior of individuals.

Under normal circumstances, only those who do not comply with legal judgments and those who do not pay their debts are restricted from spending highly.

In general, if there is a financial problem with the company, if there is inappropriate behavior, you will be restricted from spending. And there's debt out there.

When there is a problem with personal assets, they will be restricted from spending, especially the leaders of some large companies.

Even when the debt has not been repaid, it will be restricted from spending.

Restricting consumption is not to brush too much, and the balance of this savings in your own credit card and your bank card cannot be used casually, which can be said to be very restrictive.

It means that no matter how much money he earns, he can't spend it all on himself, which I think should be a more distressing thing for rich people

Restricting spending means that you can't take a first-class seat or higher on the high-speed rail, and you can only fly in economy class. Individuals will also be restricted from any investment activities and will be restricted from opening credit cards.

Restricting consumption means that integrity has suffered some losses, and what you want to buy must be in the restricted **, not more than how much, otherwise you can't buy it.