The ancients said that a woman is virtuous if she is not talented, is this sentence wrong?

Yes, I think it's very wrong, girls are more thoughtful, and the future will definitely be equal between men and women.

There is a mistake, virtue and talent are not in conflict, so it is okay to be talented and virtuous.

I think it's wrong, yes, it's not important, because the responsibilities are different, so it is said that a woman without virtue is talent, and a woman without talent is virtue, I think this is also right.

There is a mistake, the current society is about equality between men and women, and women are nothing without talents.

In ancient times, in fact, I think this sentence should be one-sided, after all, there is a saying that a woman with knowledge can make trouble, and then a talented woman can teach her husband and children at home, and she can also keep one side peaceful, which is also okay.

I think this statement is wrong. After all. Talent is the most important thing. Ancient times. It's all patriarchal.

I think there is a problem, virtue should be possessed for every girl, not that if you are talented, you can not be virtuous.

I don't think this sentence is wrong, because it's still a girl, don't participate too much, wow.

This sentence is understood this way. If a woman is stupid, she won't cause trouble at home. It is also necessary to understand the context of the time:

will not be jealous and make trouble at home. Now they are all very talented, but the consequence of overemphasizing themselves is that the family is not harmonious. There can only be one voice in a family, in fact, in ancient times, there were many families in which men were strict with their wives, but it was not easy for the patriarchal society to say it on the surface.

Now talented girls want to master the right to speak in the family, as long as they get your husband, they are afraid of being evenly matched, but they will fight and finally divorce.

Now people distort that a woman's lack of talent is virtue, this sentence is originally a hymn, and it is a literal meaning, saying that women have no talent to see morality.

It is very problematic for women to be talentless and virtuous, how not to say that men are not talented is filial piety.

The true meaning of this sentence is that although a woman is very talented, she does not think that she is very powerful, nor does she take her talents to heart, and still has a humble attitude towards others, such a woman has truly noble virtue.

The saying that a woman is virtuous if she is not talented has been passed down for thousands of years, and in modern times, most people think that it means to demean women. Many people think that this sentence is to say that women have no talent and ability, they are already considered virtuous, which means that women do not need to be talented, nor do they need to be capable, and there is no need to do a big career, as long as they teach their husbands and children at home and live a mediocre life, they can be regarded as recognized by society. But modern women don't think so, they think that men and women are equal in today's society, and this old-fashioned saying is no longer applicable to modern society, so they criticize and write from time to time, denouncing this sentence "Women are virtuous if they are not talented", hoping to rehabilitate themselves.

At the same time, they also have great doubts, no matter how feudal people were in ancient times, they would not look down on women so much.

In fact, the wisdom of the ancients is far beyond the imagination of many modern people. Now women think that the ancients look down on women, but they know that in fact, modern women do not understand classical culture, misinterpret the meaning of this ancient saying, and properly misunderstand the ancients. This sentence of the ancients was originally used to praise women, and it is a couplet that is connected, and the complete upper and lower couplets are:

A man is virtuous, and a woman is virtuous."

The meaning is: if a man has noble virtues, it is equivalent to having extraordinary talents and abilities, and he will be recognized by society; Although a woman is full of talent, if she can see her talent as a very ordinary thing, and still be able to treat others very modestly, it means that the woman has noble virtues.

In fact, regardless of whether this sentence is linked up or down, or whether it is said by women or men, it only emphasizes one problem: that is, whether you have talent or not, you must attach importance to virtue in life, and having a noble character will be recognized by society. The "no talent" in "a woman is not talented" means "not taking her talent as a proud capital".

The meaning I want to express is that if you don't have talent to learn, then you must do three from four virtues. This is due to the relatively low status of women in ancient times, and it is also a kind of contempt for women, so such words are used to prevent women from studying.

Because the ancients believed that girls should stay in their own rooms to do female work or do some housework, should not go to gain more knowledge, only abide by the principle of husband and child, is a girl's moral character; It is because in ancient times there was an idea of male superiority and inferiority of women, and they believed that girls should take care of all the housework for their husbands, and should not show their heads outside.

It means that if a woman does not study, then there will be benevolence, righteousness and morality, because the ancients felt that women are not the material for reading, so they should go to their husbands and children at home, and morality is the most important.

It means that a woman is a good woman if she is not educated. Because the ancients believed that learned women did not abide by women's morals.