Sony A33 use experience, let s talk about it? And how to shoot at night

1. Sony A33's maximum 7FPS continuous shooting is a highlight of this camera, which is much stronger than ordinary home machines.

3. The 3-inch 920,000-pixel rotatable LCD display on the back of the machine is convenient for framing from different angles, but it may not be "professional" enough to outsiders.

5. As for night shooting, you basically need to rely on a tripod, don't be superstitious about high sensitivity, that function is not even a decoration, there are many points about night photography on the Internet, you can find it.

I think the A33 belongs to the combination of SLR and mirrorless camera, it has a reflector, and the volume is not small, which is an alternative to the micro-single-camera. It can be viewed through the LCD screen or the viewfinder frame, but the frame is not optically viewed, but electronically viewed. My own feeling is that the cost performance is quite high, and it is OK to shoot **, and the effect is good.

The disadvantage is that it consumes a lot of power, and if you want to start, it is recommended to buy one or two more sets of batteries. If you have enough money, it is more cost-effective to buy a dual-lens set.

In addition, the A35 will also be available soon, so you can keep an eye out for it.

It is not recommended for the landlord to choose a mirrorless camera, ** high, but the cost performance is not high, although it is small and convenient, but it consumes a lot of power, and the focus is also very slow. Mirrorless cameras are framed, browsed and changed settings through the screen, and the screen consumes the most power, a dry battery does not last long, in addition, there are few mirrorless lenses, it is difficult to upgrade, it is better to buy a card machine or a DSLR camera directly. Like C and N, the two largest domestic camera manufacturers have not launched mirrorless products, you can see its market space Or choose a SLR or cost-effective card It is recommended that the new card player of the IXUS series and Canon 60D SLR, both are not bad

The performance is already quite good for the entry machine,Sony's single electric advantage and its excellent continuous shooting,Personally, I still prefer the style of Sony's SLR,Many friends around are also ready to start,But Sony's upcoming launchA35I heard that it is more cost-effective。

Upstairs See it clearly The landlord is talking about A33 Sony's single camera. It's not a mirror.

The A33 combines the functions of a card player, and it is also the latest entry-level SLR on the market, and its performance is still better than that of Canon or Nikon.

A33 is fixed with a reflector, there are certain defects, and a certain amount of light will be sacrificed, I really like A33, I think it is still A55

1. Considering all A33 or A55, it is better to go directly to the mirrorless. And recently it was discovered that there was a problem with these two machines. If it is a set of less than 5000 yuan, I recommend considering Pentax K-X, or directly on K-R, and read the evaluation for yourself!

This camera is very good, I'm using it, it's fully functional, it's easy to use, I heard that it's a long time to shoot and it's hot, I haven't tried it yet, and the seven dark injuries said on the Internet are not very valid. Home use is very affordable and sufficient, and it would be even better if it was equipped with a good lens.

I'm also keeping an eye on this machine! I don't know if I have to wait for someone who has used it to show up.,But it seems that there is indeed a phenomenon of camera heating.,Another flaw is that the viewfinder will have a slight delay and tailing.,But it's said to be acceptable! I don't know anything else, I'm planning to go to Wukesong again one day to see the real machine and make a decision!

Upstairs see clearly, people are asking about Sony, you call someone with a Canon lens, speechless. I also use A33, I use Minolta AF lens, Sony's A-mount is compatible with Minolta AF lens, because Sony's camera technology is inherited from Minolta, Minolta lenses are very cost-effective, although only second-hand but ** is not expensive, telephoto recommends Minolta AF70-210, one of Minolta's small three yuan, second-hand ** about 1500, the imaging color is oily and gorgeous, partial German style, you can go on it if you don't have a small budget. If the funds allow, you can get on Sony's ZA Zeiss lens.

Depends on actual needs and budget:

If you mainly shoot street scenes, you can take into account the scenery in the classic focal length.

If you want to shoot portraits, the quality is very good, and you can shoot night scenes with a large aperture.

If there is no specific purpose, the FE24-70mmF4 has a practical focal length and can be used in a wide range of subjects.

It is not advisable to go out of your way to buy a manual lens for the sake of playing with the adapter unless you have the time and budget to do so.

It is recommended to choose Canon's lens, professional camera, products and after-sales are good, independent research and development of lenses, the lens group is very strong, the landlord can go to the official website to see which lens is more suitable for himself.

You can see these features by comparing them with other cameras in the same price range, and the focus speed and noise are not possible in the same price range of DSLRs.

Not only is there a time delay, but there is also a color cast. Although I don't have this thing in my hand, I can understand that after playing with the store and thinking about it, after the electronic framing and image capture, it has to go through a lot of calculations before displaying it on the LCD. Think about the delay parameter of your computer's LCD monitor, which only receives image data and displays it, which is less time-consuming than image acquisition and data calculation.

In addition, the LCD display is refreshed frame by frame, if you think about the refresh rate of your computer monitor, that is, 60, the LCD viewfinder may not reach 60, which is even heavier delay.

It doesn't matter if you shoot a still life, but if you want to capture a look or something, it's a lot worse.

Speaking of color cast, after a rough calculation and then displayed on the LCD image, the color can not be very positive, although it does not affect the color of the final film, but from the perspective of creation, of course, the color is closer to the reality of the framing has more room to play.

I don't have this problem with my own use, maybe in the case of an individual case The autofocus and noise control are very good, at least a rare quality in a machine of the same price.

There will be a time delay, and it feels like EVF can only be used as an auxiliary or when pretending to be a professional.

In other words, if you want to use an optical viewfinder, why choose a single electric? It's good to go directly to the SLR.

I don't have this concern about 700-degree myopia.

Many people buy SLRs because they can't stand the sluggishness of DC focusing. And micro-simplicity is a congenital weakness in this regard.

The focusing method of mirrorless is called contrast detection, it is to find the maximum contrast, this is the general DC and mirrorless focusing method, when starting to focus, the display screen is in a blurred state, and then start to look for the maximum contrast position, when the contrast reaches the maximum value, the focus does not stop, but continues to detect, when the camera finds that the contrast becomes smaller, knows that the focus is missed, and returns to the previous maximum contrast again. Therefore, when consumers use the card camera to focus, they will feel that the display screen will change from blurry to clear, then blurry and clearer, and finally stop at the sharpest point. At this point, both the small DC and the mirrorless focus have done a certain amount of useless work, which is also an important reason why the small DC cannot capture quickly.

Due to the presence of a reflector, the SLR can use phase detection to focus, and at the beginning, the current focus position can be judged by the phase detection signal whether it is forward or backward, and the useless work of chromatic aberration detection to find back and forth is less, so the focusing speed is faster. After buying a mirror, I am actually still using the DC focusing system, which is something that many people only realize after buying it. For high-speed objects, such as pets, children, etc., it is still difficult to cope with the micro-mirror.

It's relatively lightweight, and the zoom is better than the big shot. However, the image sensor size is too small, and the image quality is mediocre.