How strong is Pirlo, compared to Beckham?

These two are not at the same level, David Beckham.

Not the kind of indispensable man, despite precise set-pieces, he is a first-class wing-back who is good in attack and defence, not the best, but can also play as a central midfielder.

Pirlo is a player who changed the course of football, an absolute midfield brain, Beckham's footwork he also has, and at the same time, his vision, ball control, penalty level, and defensive skills are all stronger than Beckham, Beckham only has the ability to run is obviously better than Pirlo.

Now when you look at Pirlo playing, you can basically see the two tricks of passing and control, and it is recommended to look at the 06 World Cup.

The first game was against Ghana.

Pirlo not only organized the offense in an orderly manner, but also pulled the ball past people to instigate counterattacks after many direct steals on the defensive end, and was absolutely all-round in attack and defense.

On the strength of kicking, sleep skin wins.

The first is the ability to protect the ball. Or the moment of switching from defense to attack, if someone is pressing, Zidane.

It can be largely ignored, Pirlo can continue to keep an eye on his team-mates while protecting the ball, Pep Guardiola.

With Xavi, Iniesta can get the ball out before the opposition comes to press – although they aren't really afraid of pressing, and Beckham.

Feng He can only protect the ball carefully.

The second is awareness. Especially the awareness of the moment from defense to attack, at this moment, those who have watched Beckham play may notice that he will always have a moment of hesitation. Why did he hesitate?

Actually, it's a matter of vision, at this time Pirlo can see his team-mate twenty-five meters away at a glance, and where Beckham can see, I don't know, it won't be far away anyway.

Finally, there's the rhythm. Rhythm is something that can't be seen or touched, but it's really there. In terms of controlling the rhythm, Pirlo can be said to be a real god, he can instantly improve the atmosphere on the field, that is, when the game on the field makes the audience want to sleep and shoot the hole, Pirlo suddenly directly pulls the rhythm of the game, and vice versa, and in this regard, it is exactly what Beckham does not have, and it is difficult to make up for it.

Actually, rhythm is often England.

Players are the most lacking. Look at the year, I forgot which game, Italy vs. England, Pirlo was still there at that time, England a group of young people were on a rampage, desperately trying to win, but the rhythm of the whole game was held by Pirlo in his hands, and finally won. Whether it is the European Championship final or the Italian lineup, there is no master like Pirlo, but the rhythm of the whole game is still in the hands of Italy, of course, it is far less convenient than Pirlo's time.

But with no ball at his feet to follow the team's counter-attacking speed, Beckham is no bad in this regard. Look at Manchester United back then.

The game often sees Manchester United playing on the counter-attack when Giggs Scholes.

Fast forward, Keane.

Half a step behind, where is Beckham at this time? In fact, he is on the same line as Giggs Scholes, that is, Beckham, who has no ball at his feet, can almost catch up with Giggs, who has the ball at his feet.

Beckham is a player on the right side of the midfield, first-class in attack and defense, the first in the world in the right cross, and the free kick technique is also one of the best. Next to Pirlora is a midfield metronome with strong skills at his feet, and he and Beckham are two types of players, and there is no comparison.

Beckham is better than Andrea Pirlo in every way, because Beckham is a very good footballer, he has great skills, he has quick reflexes, he has won a lot of awards, he has a lot of defensive skills, he can break through a lot of people, he can beat hail and his ability is also recognized. So I think this question is very incorrect.

Because Pirlo can deal cards with both feet, and then the speed of the foot's manuscript or time is very fast, the ball speed is also very fast, his influence is relatively large, and the honors he has won in the football world are different, Pirlo has joined AC Milan in 2001, and then played for 10 seasons, won two first division titles and the Italian Cup, and also won the Super Cup crown cover team, he is an Italian international.

There is no way to compare the two of them, because one is a midfielder and the other is a full-back, and they are not in the same position at all, so they may not be able to compare. In my opinion, Beckham is not worse than the other party at all, but is particularly good.