Does the wife have the right to beat the child without the husband s consent?

According to the law, women have the right to have children in accordance with the relevant provisions of the state, and they also have the freedom not to have children. If the woman has not violated the law without the knowledge of her spouse**, but the relationship between the husband and wife has broken down due to a dispute over whether to have children, and one party requests a divorce, the people's court shall grant the divorce after mediation.

According to Article 9 of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, where a husband requests damages on the grounds that his wife's unauthorized termination of pregnancy violates his reproductive rights, the people's court will not support it.

Hello, there is currently no legal protection for the husband, and the woman has the right to decide whether to stop the pregnancy or not. In addition, according to the law, if a husband requests damages on the grounds that his wife's unauthorized termination of pregnancy violates his reproductive rights, the people's court will not support it.

Legal basis] Article 23 of the Interpretation (I) of the Marriage and Family Section of the Civil Code: Where a wife requests compensation for damages on the grounds that the wife's unauthorized termination of pregnancy violates her reproductive rights, the people's court shall not support it; Where a dispute arises between the husband and wife over whether or not to have children, and the relationship has truly broken down, and one party requests a divorce, the people's court shall handle it in accordance with the provisions of Article 1079, Paragraph 3, Item 5 of the Civil Code.

No, the woman has the right not to have children, thank you.

It is not illegal, this is an act of giving up the right of women to have children! If the husband sues for infringement of reproductive rights, the court will not accept it.

Generally there will be no legal liability if they are. If you don't want to be together, then this kind of man must pursue the legal department, and if you pursue legal responsibility, this person must be. Responsible, because the child is two.

The husband has legal protection for this matter, and he can sue her for violating his right to know.

The wife has the right to decide whether to have children or not, and it is also her right to not discuss it with you, and the husband can't control the wife, which the law does not protect.

Yes, they can sue their wives for depriving them of their reproductive rights and have the right to claim compensation for moral damages.

The law will not go, and the wife cannot beat the child without the consent of her husband, which is the crystallization of two people.

It's up to you to pursue it or not. The child is joint with the husband and wife. If your wife knocks down the sign without authorization, she is depriving you of your rights.

If the wife goes to kill the common child without her husband's knowledge, then this situation must be a bad behavior, first of all, the impact of the child on both of you and your husband is very great.

The woman has the absolute right to have children, and the woman has the final say on whether to have a child or not, because the man has nothing to pay for having a child, and the burden of conceiving a child is on the woman, you can change your wife, but you can't force your wife to have children.

The wife beat the child without her husband's knowledge, does the husband have legal protection? If you want to pursue it, there must be.

I think if you are still a husband and wife. case. Don't pursue the case if you don't want to hire. You can go to court and apply.

You can go to the court to sue the woman and beat the child out of your own hands, at least without asking for your opinion, and you have the right to sue her.

This should be a civil dispute, and I believe that even if the lawsuit is brought to the court, the court will not accept it.

The wife beat the child without her husband's knowledge, does the husband have legal protection? It is protected by law.

If it is a situation where the wife kills the child without her husband's knowledge, even if the husband has such a law, this is not a good practice.

Consult a lawyer? There should be legal protection.

Legal analysis: The wife does not need the man's consent to kill the child. Women have the freedom to reproduce, and they can choose to keep their children or have their children removed, and this reproductive freedom is not dominated by anyone.

Legal basis: "Law of the Chinese People's Republic of China on the Protection of Women's Rights and Benefits" Article 51: Women have the right to have children in accordance with relevant state provisions, and also have the freedom not to have children.

Summary. Kiss, glad your question was broken. The woman does not need to bear legal responsibility for her private **, which does not constitute a violation.

Kiss, glad your question was broken. The woman does not need to bear legal responsibility for her private **, which does not constitute a violation.

Women have the right to have children, but they also have the freedom not to have children. In fact, the wife's autonomy is a kind of punishment for her own body, and it is a free choice for "not having children". Marriage in itself does not mean that both parties must have children, and neither self-contraception nor abortion by the wife constitutes a violation of the husband's rights.