The 31 year old proprietress was robbed and killed in the early morning, and her husband claimed com

The responsibility must be borne by the person who committed the crime, I think her husband's claim with the community property is really vexatious, why don't I protect my wife.

I think the property should have an unshirkable responsibility, and the property must bear the corresponding responsibility for failing to protect the owner in the community!

I think that the crime is the most responsible, and the poor supervision of the property in the community is also partly responsible.

I think the property needs to be held responsible, because the property is responsible for registering and protecting the personal safety of the residents of the community, but he let those irrelevant people into the community, which will bring personal harm to the owners of the community.

In this case, the monitoring in the community should not be seen, whether it is the prevarication of the security guards or the real lack of manpower. We know that the general owners need to see the community monitoring when they will always be broken by the community monitoring, no police will not let you see, protect the privacy of the owners and other reasons to prevent the owners from watching the monitoring. It's also how the property can avoid trouble.

But the owner doesn't just ask to see the surveillance. So this is the property requirements for employees not to look at the monitoring casually, or is it true that the security guard can't leave. If the security guard can't leave, it means that the security of the community is not enough, and there is no one on duty in the monitoring room.

Then these surveillances may only be used as a tool to track down suspects, rather than to provide timely assistance at the time of the crime. So no matter what aspect it is, the property has a certain responsibility.

When something like this happens, the property is not to blame. Just wait for the outcome of the trial.

Personally, I think that the property is responsible, the elevator is monitored, and the security room of the property can be seen, and the security guard has the responsibility to protect the safety of residents.

The property of the community must be responsible, because it is the first time that it occurs in the community, any person entering and leaving the community, the property needs to be registered and recorded, and the elevator and the community should be monitored, and the property security does not check the monitoring in time, so how much is responsible.

I think that the property of the community has to bear a certain responsibility, because the proprietress was robbed and killed in the community, and the property of the community is mainly responsible for the security of the community and intercepting the entry of those unknown people.

If you are not responsible, what is the use of paying the property fee of the community? If the protection is not effective, it must be held responsible.

Aren't security guards responsible for policing the community? Nothing cares about paying property fees.

The security guards who will only collect money to mess around,Monitoring is to monitor the abnormality of the community,Someone must be staring in the monitoring room,You have to wait until there is a problem and then adjust the monitoring There is a fart.,Can you find the criminal, but can the life be saved?

Property security has the responsibility of registering some simple basic information of the entry personnel, and the property also has certain responsibilities and obligations to protect the safety of the living environment.

The security guard of the property is not called a security guard, but an order maintainer, as you can imagine.

Before I entered the house, the thief asked the property to adjust the monitoring, saying that only the police were qualified to see it, no matter what, and directly shirk the responsibility! I only know that when the time comes, I will charge the property fee!

Killing is a split-second thing, and who knew that one person in the elevator would kill another? The responsibility of the property is not large, and in the same way, the police on the street do not need to be responsible.

Yes, the murderer is not guilty of much so. The property in the community is not only responsible for the responsibility of the public security bureau, because the public security is not effective in supervising the entire society.

The property in the community should be held responsible, because they did not do a good job of security, resulting in the owner being killed, and there is an unshirkable responsibility!

The property of the community should be held responsible, and the criminal responsibility and civil responsibility of the security guards on duty should be investigated!

The owner was killed! What do the property and security guards eat? What are you asking for money for? Primary Responsibilities.

Safety has nothing to do with the property, why does the property company do it, only responsible for hiring a few aunts to sweep the floor?

It must be the responsibility of the property, otherwise why pay the property fee.

Does he collect money, what kind of money is collected, and he knows whether he should be held responsible.

Property management is fully responsible, and it is said that raising a dog to protect the family has become a decoration, and it is fully compensated!

Recently, in Quanzhou, Fujian, a 31-year-old proprietress who ran a food stall was killed by a man in the early hours of the morning.

On May 27, the 31-year-old proprietress was Mr. Liu's wife. At 3 o'clock in the morning, Mr. Liu's wife called ** from a friend and told him to go for supper after returning home from work. So Mr. Liu, at 3:04, called ** to his wife and said that he was waiting for her downstairs, and when she put her things back upstairs, he set off for supper.

But when my wife crossed the elevator upstairs, after a while, she still didn't come down. Mr. Liu became anxious, so he sent a message to his wife and called **, but no one replied.

Mr. Liu noticed that something was wrong and immediately went to the security room to request that the surveillance be adjusted immediately. But the security guard actually began to shirk, saying that he couldn't leave and couldn't view the surveillance. said that he could not help Mr. Liu, and asked Mr. Liu to find it himself.

Mr. Liu had no choice but to go to his wife by himself. Mr. Liu was found until 4 a.m. and was not found. I had to turn back to the security room, but at this time, the security guard was still indifferent, saying that he couldn't leave, and asked Mr. Liu to continue to play **.

This time, Mr. Liu finally dialed his wife's **, but ** was connected, but no one spoke. Then shut down.

At this time, the security guard realized that the matter was serious and immediately called another security guard to watch the surveillance with Mr. Liu.

But it's too late. At 3:06 a.m., that is, 2 minutes after Mr. Liu's wife went upstairs, a man in a black vest held a white bag and followed Mr. Liu's wife into the elevator, and then, the man suddenly took out a tool to hijack Mr. Liu's wife, Mr. Liu's wife was so frightened that she squatted down, and then after the elevator on the sixth floor arrived, she was held down and dragged out of the elevator.

He was then killed at the top of the staircase.

Afterwards, ** tried to take away the body of the proprietress and bury the body, drag it to the basement and take it away with an electric car. At 7 o'clock in the morning, ** was taken away when he was about to bury the body.

Mr. Liu said to ** that his wife had valuables on her, such as necklaces and rings and 2,000 yuan in cash, and ** was preliminarily judged to be a robbery!

In this matter, I have to say that the security guard is responsible, and after the incident, Mr. Liu entered the security guard to make a complaint, and has hired a lawyer to defend his rights. Mr. Liu believes that if the security guards had adjusted the surveillance in time, then the tragedy might not have happened.

In addition, I have to insert a sentence here, as a security guard, I don't have such a sense of vigilance, and the man can also kill the boss lady, wrap it, and then drag the body away smoothly. This shows that the security of this property is also too poor.

The security guards of the community did not adjust the monitoring at the first time, missed the best rescue time, and believed that there was a certain relationship between the tragedy and the security guards.

It is also said that the security guard was once imprisoned for half a year for robbery, and then became a community security guard just after his release. I have to feel indignant for this community.

In this regard, the proprietress was killed, and Mr. Liu sued the security guard, what do you think?

The husband felt that the security guard did not protect his wife well, and this is one of the responsibilities of the security guard. In this case, he has to find a security guard theory and scold the security guard for inaction, he really thinks too much.

Because if the security guards had intervened in this matter earlier, the proprietress might not have died. It was the security guard's evasive behavior that hindered the timing of the boss's rescue.

In fact, it was because the security guard did not do a good job of protecting the responsibility, so the husband felt that the security guard was also responsible, in this matter.

The property company has the ability to compensate, and the gangsters may be penniless.

Are security guards inhuman? Don't you know that time is life? I can't judge the pros and cons, what is the difference between you and a fool.

Security should be held fully responsible.

The proprietress of the food stall was intercepted and killed in the elevator in the early morning, and her husband wanted to sue the security guard, what is the inside story? Let's take a look at the process of the case:

1.The husband received his wife** at 3 o'clock in the morning and made an appointment to wait for her in the underground parking lot of the community3:04 hit ** wife, wife said it would be there soonLet's wait.

But after 3 minutes, the wife still didn't come, and the husband called ** again, ** was through, but no one answered.

5.After his wife was killed, he wrapped his wife's body in a white cloth and transported it out of the community in the back of an electric car.

The husband sued the security guard for the reason:

If the security guard is responsible, after the husband is rejected for the first time, the security guard can also find the abnormality in time, at least the wife will not be strangled to death, because ** did not bring other evidence of the crime.

2.The duty of the security guard should be to check the monitoring in the security room, do not think that no one goes out to enter in the early morning, so as to relax the monitoring of the elevator, which is the responsibility of the security guard.

Therefore, no matter who this incident happens to, it will be sued to the community security, otherwise why pay so many property fees every month.

Her husband usually has a bad temper and often clashes with the security guards, so she thinks that the security guards killed her husband after the conflict between the two people.

Because the security guard's inaction indirectly led to the death of the food stall owner, the husband felt that he had to take responsibility for the incident.

The main point of contention in this case was that the husband believed that the security guard of the community had not fulfilled his due responsibilities and was responsible for his wife's death.

In fact, it was because the security guard did not do his duty well that this tragedy happened, and he had a responsibility that he could not shirk.

Security has an unshirkable responsibility.

I think it makes a lot of sense, the security guard is hired by the property to protect the owner, and the owner was robbed and killed in the community, just because the security guard failed to stop the first time, and it makes sense to scold the security guard!

First of all, the proprietress of the food stall was robbed and killed in the elevator, and the security guard definitely has a certain responsibility, the duty of the security guard is to guard the safety of the party, if the security guard is loyal to his duty, he will not give the criminal a chance to take advantage of it, and such a tragedy will not happen, so it is not surprising that everyone scolds the security guard.

It should make sense, security checks. There is also monitoring, but no problems have been found, resulting in such serious problems, which is quite terrible.

Actually, I think it makes sense to scold the security guard, because the security guard did not do his duty, and it is his fault.

There is no reason, and the security guards can't implement 24-hour monitoring of each elevator, which is too difficult.

Of course, it makes sense, and the security guards have to compensate for it.

It makes sense that there is so much property inaction.

When a person dies, he scolds two sentences, and if he scolds again, the security guards are removed, and the owners themselves take turns on duty.

The security guard is indeed derelict in his duties, but the most scolding is not **.

Security is to protect safety, not to do their duty, but also to speak eloquently.

Saying that the security guard is not responsible, so why install the camera, just think of the effect of deterring thieves?

The property is paid, and the security guard is invited by the owner of the community to be the uncle! This is the property management model of the vast majority of the country.

Why don't you blame the police???

The focus is on how the suspect got into the community

Why doesn't anyone scold and kill people, it's a bit of putting the cart before the horse.

The security guard has a responsibility for how strangers get in.

What does a security guard do? Why is it called a security guard?

There must be responsibility, what does the word security mean?