At that time, the Asian tigers developed very well, why is Japan not one of them?

Among the world's top 500 companies, South Korea has 15 Fortune 500 companies, including Samsung, Hyundai and SK. South Korea attaches great importance to education and has relatively strong scientific and technological strength, with R&D investment accounting for more than 4% of GDP, and R&D intensity ranking among the highest in the world. South Korea is an export-oriented economic country, the domestic market is small, and it needs to constantly explore the international market, ranking sixth in the total economic output of China's provinces, second only to Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong, Zhejiang and Henan, with 10,000 dollars per capita.

At present, Taiwan's manufacturing industry and high-tech industry.

It is a highly developed economy, and its economic growth rate in recent years is among the highest among advanced economies. In 2017, Hong Kong's total economic output was US$334.1 billion, ranking third in China's urban economic aggregate, second only to other countries, and Singapore's GDP in 2017 was US$305.8 billion, or US$10,000 per capita. Singapore is Asia's most important financial, service and shipping centre, with a per capita dollar after New York, London and Beijing.

Hong Kong is an internationally important financial, service and shipping industry.

Today, these four regions have grown into developed economies.

In addition to the West and Japan, the "Asian Tigers" are currently one of the few developed economies in the world, "refers to the 60s of the last century, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, these four countries and regions to implement export-oriented.

Talking about the "Asian Tigers" has been studied as the history of economic development, of course, their development experience is also a sample of our country's reform and opening up, and the reference significance is very large, and even our early economic development trajectory is very similar to the "Asian Tigers", but it is different, because the "Asian Tigers" are larger in scale.

Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong.

and regions. Since the 60s of the last century, the above four countries and regions have pursued export-oriented economic strategies, starting with South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong, which are all small countries or small places. Take advantage of geographical advantages or international geopolitical trends to achieve rapid economic development in a short period of time.

Because Japan was already a developed country at that time, the Asian Tigers were Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea, and they were not as good as Japan at that time.

Because the economic level of the Asian tigers was not at the same level as Japan, Japan was a developed country at that time, and it surpassed them too much, so it was not in this ranks.

Because after Japan's real estate bubble, it is known in economic history as Japan's 30 years of regression, and after that time, housing prices fell by more than 70%. Japan will be sluggish.

The reason why Japan does not belong to the hand judgment is swiftAsian TigersThere are three reasons for this.

First, the Asian Tigers refer to the emerging developed countries.

Japan is older than the old developed countries, so Japan does not belong to the Asian Tigers.

The second reason is that the economic development model of the Asian tigers is basically the same, but it is different from that of Japan. The Asian Tigers all started from the backward production capacity of developed countries, and World War II.

Later, Japan directly obtained the technology patents that the United States had just eliminated, so the development model was different.

The third reason is that the four Asian tigers are all "export-oriented", and although the Japanese economy is mainly based on exports, the way of exporting is not the same. The factories of the Asian Tigers are built in the territory and exported from the territory. The Japanese, on the other hand, go directly to foreign countries to build factories and sell them to consumers in their countries, thus eliminating the intermediate shipping costs.

The Asian Tigers refer to the four fast-growing economies in Asia from the late 60s to the 90s: South Korea and Taiwan, China.

Hong Kong and Singapore.

The Asian Tigers were before the 70's with agriculture and light industry.

Dominated by the 70s and 90s, the economy developed at a high speed. They use developed countries to develop countries.

The opportunity to transfer labor-intensive industries, attract a large amount of foreign capital and technology, take advantage of the local cheap and good labor force, adjust the economic development strategy in a timely manner, and develop rapidly, becoming a developed country and region in Asia after Japan.

Its successful economic development process and experience are typical examples of development economics research. The 1997 Asian financial crisis.

Later, with the development and change of the international economic situation, this term has been used less.

The Four Dragons are underdeveloped countries or regions that have become developed countries or regions, and in 1968 Japan had become the world's third largest economy, so the title of Little Dragons was no longer suitable for Japan.

In 1990, the total GDP of the Four Tigers was 559 billion US dollars, and Japan had 3,132.8 billion US dollars, which is more than five times the sum of the Four Little Tigers, and this is the gap after the Four Little Tigers created an economic miracle in the 80s.

Economic characteristics of the Asian Tigers: Zen Sakura

1. Fast growth. Since the 60s of the 20th century, the average annual growth rate of GDP has been close to or more than 10%.

2. Major changes have taken place in the economic structure. The proportion of agriculture in the national economy in South Korea fell from 1961 to 15% in 1985, and the industrial and mining industry increased from 1985 to 15%. The proportion of agriculture in Taiwan, China, decreased from 1952 to 1978, and the proportion of industry increased from 1978. Hong Kong and Singapore have also transformed from entrepot ports to industrial cities.

3. The per capita national income level has increased rapidly.

4. The number of unemployed people has decreased, and the income distribution is relatively even. In the 80s, the unemployment rate in these countries and regions fell below 4%, and the income distribution was relatively even compared with Europe and the United States.

The four countries of the Asian Tigers are not on the same level as Japan economically, so the Asian Tigers do not have Japan. The Asian Tigers include Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea.

The Asian Tigers refer to the four fast-growing economies in Asia from the late 60s to the 90s: South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore.

The Asian Tigers were dominated by agriculture and light industry before the 70s, and the economy developed at a high rate in the 70s and 90s. They have taken advantage of the opportunity of transferring labor-intensive industries from developed countries to developing countries, attracted large amounts of foreign capital and technology, and made use of the advantages of cheap and good local labor to adjust their economic development strategies in a timely manner and develop rapidly.

It has become a developed country and region in Asia after Japan, and its successful economic development process and experience are typical examples of development economics research. After the Asian financial crisis in 1997, with the development and changes of the international economic situation, this term has been used less.

Origin of the name. The "Asian Tigers" is a term and concept commonly used in Asian countries in the 20th century, and Western countries call them "Asian Tigers" (English: Four Asian Tigers, German: Tigerstaaten).

There is also the term "Tiger Cub Economies", which refers to four developing countries in Asia: Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines.

Asian TigersThere is no Japan becauseAt that time, Japan's economy was already at the level of a big country, and it was much ahead of the four tigers, so it could be said to be a big dragon, so it was not suitable to be called the four tigers.

At that time, Japan could be said to be a great dragon, because its total economy, total population, and total GDP were stronger than these countries and regions, and it developed and started earlier than it.

Japan through Songshu Ji.

It is already a pole, and its economic power is above that of the rest of Asia. It has become an independent economy that has jumped out of the scope of the dragon.

The Asian Tigers are South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan.

The economies of these countries or regions are relatively small but developing rapidly, so they are called the Four Little Tigers.

The development of the four tigers is inseparable from developed countries such as Japan.

The transfer of industry to these low-cost countries and regions has created a loss for the rapid development of these countries or regions.

No.

Asian Tigers

Refers to emerging developed countries.

Japan belongs to the old developed countries, so Japan does not belong to the Asian Tigers. On the whole, because Japan's economy was already a pole at that time, and its economic strength was above that of other Asian countries, why did it care about the name of the "Four Little Tigers", and Japan at that time was actively breaking away from Asia and joining Europe, so it did not disdain this title.

Japan's economic development is relatively good:Japan in World War II.

It has accumulated a strong foundation before, so it is not a "self-made". But Nobuhan is the speed of Japan's rise, no less than the Asian Tigers. By 1968, Japan's total GDP had surpassed that of the Federal Republic of Germany.

It ranks second among the capitalist countries of the world.

The economic development model of the Asian Tigers is basically the same, but it is different from that of Japan. The Asian tigers all started from undertaking the backward production capacity of developed countries, while Japan after World War II directly obtained the technology patents that the United States had just eliminated, so the development model was different.