Adhere to common prosperity and oppose some of the first riches, what do you think about this?

If it is in a political book, it will tell you: common prosperity is not synchronous prosperity. Encourage some people to get rich first through honest labor and legal management, and then the first rich will lead the latter to become rich, and finally achieve common prosperity.

Therefore, there is no contradiction between getting rich first and common prosperity, and it will not affect common prosperity because of being rich first. Getting rich first is a policy that conforms to China's national conditions, is conducive to China's economic development, and is conducive to the realization of common prosperity. (Some are free-to-play .......)Don't mind ......The meaning should be about ......）

Isn't this a junior high school political question? I can still recite ......Titicaca ......

Common prosperity is an abstract concept, and it is an unrealizable concept, just a beautiful idea, but it can be considered to go through other systems, and maybe it can be changed.

Work together and share resources.

The premise is that we have to have common wealth in order to achieve common prosperity.

According to your description, the prerequisite for common prosperity in such a situation is trust!

Each other's brothers are friends, not enemies, and enemies will certainly not be able to prosper together.

It's better to have a closer relationship, men and women envy friends or something.

Except for the iron buddies, they are generally dangerous.

They are all people who are not wealthy, working together to do a cause, equal and mutually beneficial.

The premise of common prosperity is that both the rich and the poor are equal.

The premise of common prosperity is that everyone is equal.

The premise of common prosperity is that the country is prosperous and strong, and the people are united.

Common prosperity can be achieved. Definition: We have built a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way, and on this basis, we must continue to do a good job in making the cake bigger and dividing the cake well, vigorously promote high-quality development, generally improve the income level of urban and rural residents, gradually narrow the distribution gap, and resolutely prevent polarization.

Common prosperity is the prosperity of all people, not the prosperity of a few; It is the people's material life and spiritual life that are both rich, not just materially rich and spiritually empty; It is common prosperity where there is still a certain disparity, not uniform egalitarian equal prosperity.

How to achieve common prosperity:1. In order to achieve common prosperity, we must always adhere to the basic viewpoint that "development is the last word", unswervingly grasp the center of economic construction, and create more social material wealth that people need faster.

2. At the same time, we must adhere to the principle of giving priority to efficiency and taking into account fairness. Generally speaking, in the area of primary distribution, there are differences recognized and efficiency is given priority; In the field of redistribution, it is necessary to adjust distribution through fiscal and taxation policies, income distribution policies, social security policies, etc., so as to reflect fairness and fairness. The above content reference:

Encyclopedia - Common Prosperity.

Common prosperity is the essential requirement of socialism and the common aspiration of the people. In the final analysis, we want to achieve common prosperity for all people in promoting economic and social development. The "cake" is bigger, and the "cake" must be divided.

It is a long-term, complex, and arduous task to promote the reform of the income distribution system, adjust the pattern of national income distribution, gradually narrow the income gap between residents, and promote common prosperity for all the people. We must intensify the adjustment of the distribution of national income, improve the primary distribution of national income, reform the redistribution of national income, improve the third distribution of national income, do everything possible to alleviate the trend of widening the gap in the distribution of residents' income, and on the basis of continuous economic and social development, make the fruits of development benefit all the people more and more fairly, so that the people's sense of gain, happiness and security will be more fulfilling, more secure and more sustainable, and steadily advance in the direction of common prosperity.

The topic of achieving common prosperity is the goal that our country has been developing and pursuing in the past few years, and a large part of the main force in achieving common prosperity are college students and young adults. College students have a long way to go on the road to achieve common prosperity, first of all, we should learn what we should learn in school, and in our spare time, we can learn about our favorite things to broaden our knowledge, so as to have more choices and grasp of the future road development, followed by work experience must be sufficient, no work experience can not be able to gain a foothold in society. Having a wealth of work experience can allow us to avoid many detours on the road in the future and develop rapidly.

False] China's socialist practice has proved that the elimination of exploitation and the attainment of common prosperity are a process of gradual realization on the basis of the development of productive forces, and common prosperity is not the same as simultaneous prosperity and simultaneous prosperity. Allow and encourage some qualified people to get rich first, and the first rich will lead the latter to get rich, and help the latter to get rich, so as to eventually achieve common prosperity. Therefore, the judgment of this question is incorrect.

To achieve the grand goal of common prosperity for all the people, development ultimately depends. The productive forces ultimately determine the existence, development, and transformation of the mode of production, and what kind of production capacity there is has is what kind of material production and life relations. Therefore, development is the last word, and only development can satisfy the people's ardent yearning for a better life.

Without development and solid development results, there can be no common prosperity.

The nature and significance of social developmentThe essential core of social development is to promote the all-round development of people, and the purpose of social development is to eliminate exploitation, eliminate polarization, and ultimately achieve common prosperity. It describes the essence of socialism in a dynamic way. The core of Keqinfan's development concept is people-oriented, and "people-oriented" should ultimately take the all-round development of people as the destination.

It can be said that the theory of the essence of socialism is based on the basic national conditions of the initial stage of socialism in China, and its ultimate goal is to realize the free and all-round development of human beings.

False, common prosperity is not egalitarianism, we must allow some people to get rich first through honest work and legal business, and the first rich will lead the latter to get rich, and finally achieve common prosperity.

False: Common prosperity refers to the fact that some people get rich first and help others to achieve common prosperity together.

This is the exact words of the political book.

Q: Why is common prosperity not synchronous prosperity and not egalitarianism?

A: Common prosperity is a process, not simultaneous prosperity. Simultaneous affluence violates the law of development.

The development of things can only be a process from part to whole, from quantitative change to qualitative change. The realization of the goal of common prosperity is a historical and gradual process and a long-term process. Common prosperity cannot make all people achieve the same degree of prosperity at the same time, in the same space, and at the same speed. Not every member of society has equal wealth, but it is based on the recognition of reasonable differences.

Therefore, common prosperity is not synchronous prosperity.

Wrong, synchronous, and at the same time, equal are all wrong.