Is this kind of configurator fun Star 2?

Yes, the configuration requirements of competitive games are generally not too high, but it is estimated that it is a game that has not yet come out, and it may only be possible to open medium quality, and your graphics card is not very good.

The French game that launched the SC2 pre-sale** claimed that Blizzard had revealed the minimum configuration CPU for StarCraft 2: Pentium 4 or AMD X2 3000+ RAM: 2GB

Graphics: GF7900 ATIx1950XT

Hard disk size: 5g

Recommended requirements.

Operating system: Windows Vista

Processor: Dual-core processor or above.

Graphics: 512 MB VRAM with anti-aliasing and HDR (GeForce 7800 GTX).

RAM: 2 GB (preferably 4GB).

HDD: 7200 rpm SATA HD

cpu：p4

AMD 3200+ or more.

RAM: 512MB

Graphics: GF7300

Turn on the special effect configuration.

CPU: AMD 3600 x2 (dual-core).

RAM: 1GB

Graphics card: GF7600 (open part special effects), GF7900 (open full special effects).

I can play it improvised.,The effect has to be turned off all the cards when the effect is turned on.

It should be no problem, but if you want to turn on the special effects, you have to upgrade.

2GB of RAM

The graphics card should be sufficient.

Absolutely, yes

It should be fine.

The configuration requirements for Interstellar 2 should be lower than yours.

The graphics card is a bit worse but overall ok-pull.

Except for the graphics card, everything else is fine, your graphics card is a bit hangy.

Obviously, as 1l said, there is no problem if you want to play.

Interstellar 2 is not good at multi-core optimization so far, and the lead gap between more than 2 cores and 2 cores is very small, but the cache has a large frequency impact.

The graphics card is a little less powerful, so you need to make a trade-off between image quality and speed (of course, you can choose a medium basic image quality).

Obviously, you can, however, the CPU: Intel Core Dual-Core E5800 is a Pentium dual-core, Intel didn't call it Core.

However, the performance is still very good