What are the disadvantages of merging primary schools in rural areas? How to solve these problems?

If you don't merge schools, there are not enough children in rural areas. In the 80s, we went to school in the countryside, and there were about 20 children in one group, and now there are only 3 children in one village. It is impossible for the country to have many schools idle.

Let's go to school, children go to school, the distance is quite far, and parents send and send. It is impossible for towns and villages to afford such high-end school buses, so they can only pick up and drop off students with some noodles or something, and now because the state has introduced a policy, they can only use special school buses to pick up and drop off. Then the school doesn't care about chartering a car, so let all your parents charter a bus together.

If something goes wrong, the school doesn't send a car, it's your parents' own business.

It should be noted that this is a problem encountered in the process of urbanization in our country, the rural population is constantly decreasing, and the number of children is also decreasing. What to do?

From the perspective of the future, the countryside will continue to become towns, and all will become towns, and of course there will be no problem.

What now? I thought that only the state should increase investment, direct state investment, and don't want the townships to bear the burden, the towns and towns can't afford it! For example, how much money the state pays for each school-age child.

In addition, there is no way to live in boarding schools in some towns and villages directly from the first grade of primary school.

After the merger, I think the biggest drawback is the disconnection between home and school. Children's moral education lags behind and there is a large deviation in behavior. Plus the current education system.

There is almost no difference between children who learn well and badly, who learn and who do not, between high and low scores, between excellent and unqualified. Among them, there is no one who suffers more than teachers and parents. For children, they don't matter.

Because they don't have to scruple about anything.

There are the following points of view: in the civilized society of the new era, education as a kind of human resource injection behavior, is indispensable, even the poorest, the most uneducated ordinary families, often expect their children to be more educated, because education can open up intelligence, improve ability, increase income, especially for the poor people, education is the channel for them to get out of poverty, improve their social and economic position, or even the only channel.

The policy of withdrawing and merging schools immediately closed down the primary schools in the countryside on a large scale, and stopped the opportunity for rural children to be educated, and the rural children happened to be the group that should be most educated. In order to educate their children, many parents are forced to send their children to campuses in big cities when they are still very young, and such children are separated from their parents at the age when they lack the strength of independent life and should be most cared for by parents, and go to live in an unfamiliar place, which will not only encounter greater confusion and emotional lack in life, but also lack of particularly critical family education, which is also very detrimental to their happy growth.

With the advent of the new era, the agricultural economy has slowly developed and expanded, the people's demand for high-quality education has become greater and greater, the situation of rural primary schools is poor, the number of students is gradually decreasing, and the allocation of teachers is not enough, and the curriculum content cannot be fully opened, which seriously affects the development and growth of education.

At the national level, it is also a consumption of teaching resources. With the acceleration of urbanization, the number of rural students is gradually decreasing, which is not only unable to centralize schools, but also affects the development of education, and should indeed be withdrawn and merged.

In the new era, people's vision of a happy life has determined the requirements for high-quality education. In the school where dozens of people still exist in the village, it is irresponsible to the villagers and the country. Of course, I'm talking about places with better economic growth, and underdeveloped places in the mountains of the central and western regions should be re-developed!

I don't think rural schools should be withdrawn and merged, each school has a different style, and the way of educating students is different, so some students may adapt to the environment of this school, and some students may not adapt to the environment of this school, so the college may make many students tired of learning in the future.

I think that schools in rural areas should be withdrawn and merged; Because there are not too many children in rural areas, and the number of left-behind children is not very large, the withdrawal of schools can improve the quality and level of teaching, and make it easier to manage.

The following factors were taken into account for the withdrawal and merger of rural schools:

1. With the acceleration of urbanization, the gap between urban and rural areas is getting wider and wider. Urbanization is now taking place everywhere, and the bigger cities are being built, the more beautiful they are, resulting in a widening gap between urban and rural areas. Rural people have no income, and investment in rural areas is limited, so even if the conditions in rural areas are much better than before, the gap is still greater than that of big cities.

2. The development of education in big cities is too fast, and the countryside cannot catch up at all. In recent years, various places have been building their own prestigious schools to expand their local influence. Therefore, there are more and more prestigious schools, especially the rise of urban private schools, which has accelerated the development of urban education.

While kindergartens in Beijing are learning English, rural schools may not have a professional English teacher.

3. Rural people have no other economy except for part-time work. In the past, rural people basically worked at home, but now rural people may not have any livelihood if they do not go out to work**. Therefore, there are almost no young people in the countryside at present, and everyone has gone out to work.

The parents did a good job outside and took their children out to school.

Only some of the parents who can't take them out go to school in the countryside are the so-called left-behind children. This part of the children is the main force of rural schools, because there is no parental companionship all the year round, there is no family education, so the responsibility of education almost all depends on the school teachers, but the ability of teachers is limited, so the quality of education in rural areas is difficult to improve!

Increased awareness of education

Education is being valued more than ever. Now people basically know that knowledge can change their fate, so they are trying their best to cultivate their children! Rural people certainly know this, too. Therefore, families with slightly better conditions in rural areas have sent their children to school in county seats.

Only those who really can't give it away will stay in the countryside and continue to go to school. Education has become the only opportunity for the people at the bottom to change their destiny, and they are trying their best to grasp what they can seize! Sun Shaomeng: Many people say that the decline of rural education is because of teachers, and excellent teachers are gone.

Yes, in this way, we can combine the resources of teachers so that children can receive a better education, instead of schools everywhere, so that there are fewer children, teachers have to teach several subjects, and they cannot specialize and specialize.

No. The houses in the countryside are scattered, and if the schools are combined, many children have to come to class from far away, wasting time, and it is not good to stay away from their parents if they live in the school.

Yes, I think this will bring together educational resources and give children a better education.

The principal who does not keep the bottom line and does nonsense is not focused on consolidating the school's position, so he will still be kicked out if he withdraws or not.

I think there are fewer and fewer students in rural areas, and some schools even have less than 20 students, so I think we should consider withdrawing and merging schools, so that we can find a suitable place to gather all the students, and we can also provide accommodation for students who are far away.

Rural schools should be abolished, there will be no rural teachers, and there will be no need for special teachers, all of which will save trouble!

Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, the public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable.

Pros: Resources can be shared, students can get relatively equal education, and it is also conducive to the good development of the overall construction of the teaching team;

Disadvantages: Some students' poor study habits may affect the original environment of a better school.

The factors or conditions to ensure the smooth withdrawal of rural schools and the regret and envy of the examination are: market demand, regional educational resource allocation, teacher allocation, student relocation and placement, social support and policy guarantees.

First, market demand

Depopulation and urbanization: There are too many schools in rural areas and not enough students, resulting in a waste of educational resources. The withdrawal and merger can enable the rational allocation of educational resources.

Changes in educational needs: There is a gap between the quality of education in rural schools and urban schools, and parents are more inclined to transfer their children to urban schools for better education.

2. Allocation of regional educational resources

Integration of educational resources: After the merger, the integration of rural school resources can be realized and the efficiency of resource utilization can be improved. Educational equity: Ensure that every student can enjoy a relatively balanced educational resource and avoid excessive concentration of resources.

3. Faculty allocation

Number and quality of teachers: After the merger, the allocation of teachers needs to be rationally arranged to ensure that the appropriate number and quality of teachers are in place. Training and transfer: Provide training opportunities and job transfer placement for teachers in former rural schools to improve the quality of teachers.

4. Student relocation and placement

Student mobility and placement: After the withdrawal and merger, it is necessary to make proper arrangements for the mobility and placement of students before or before the merger to avoid adverse effects on students' learning and life. Educational Transition:

Provide support and guidance for students as they adjust to a new school to ensure a smooth transition.

5. Social support

Parent Participation and Support: Guide parents to understand the significance of the educational reform after the withdrawal and merger, and actively participate in school education to provide support and assistance to students. Community Collaboration:

Promote the cooperation between schools and communities, and jointly promote the development of education and the smooth progress of the dismantling and merger of rural schools.

6. Policy guarantees

Relevant policy support: Formulate corresponding laws, regulations and policies to clarify the procedures, standards and requirements for the withdrawal and merger of rural schools. Financial guarantee: Provide sufficient financial support for the withdrawal of rural schools to ensure the smooth progress of resource integration and resettlement.

Summary:

To ensure the smooth withdrawal and merger of rural schools, it is necessary to comprehensively consider multiple factors such as market demand, regional education resource allocation, teacher allocation, student relocation and placement, social support and policy guarantees. Only by comprehensively considering all aspects of factors can we ensure the smooth progress of the dismantling and merger of rural schools and realize the efficient use of educational resources and educational equity.