For 60 billion barrels of oil, the Anglo Argentine Matsu Island went to war again.

First, I don't think the Falklands crisis will lead to a second war between the two sides in the foreseeable future. The Falklands War that broke out in the last century had its own unique prerequisites, that is, the Argentine regime at that time hoped to ease domestic pressure by launching the Falklands War, and in Britain, the opposition to the Conservative Party led by Margaret Thatcher was also intensifying at that time, so the Falklands War was not so much a struggle for sovereignty and resources as a struggle for its own support.

History also proves that Argentina was defeated and collapsed; Britain won and the Conservatives won the 1983 general elections. Today, this situation does not exist, Argentina** has already requested the United Nations to settle the Falklands dispute within the framework of peace negotiations, and there are few precedents for starting a war when its own side is now proposing reconciliation, because this will certainly be unanimously condemned by the international community; And the British side has no reason to start a war, Britain has not yet completely come out of the shadow of the economic crisis, the domestic contradictions are still very prominent, it is not wise to start a war at this time, and even if it is fought, Britain will not take the initiative to go to war. The reason is simple: the situation in the international community today is very different from that of the 80s of the last century.

Second: Who do you say Nansha belongs to? Who is the Diaoyu Islands?

Who is Changbai Mountain? The so-called ownership, that is, whoever occupies it, is his. This may be said a little bluntly, but this is the truth, the principles of space and history are only used as a reference, and if strictly enforced, are we going to declare war on Vietnam?

Britain has strength, so the mining rights are British, and when Argentina is strong, it will take back the Falklands in the same way that China will take back Hong Kong.

Third and fourth, you can look at this.

Fifth: From a personal point of view, I learned about the Falklands War, Britain did not win by absolute advantage, and if Argentina insists on fighting, the war may change hands. Although in the end, Argentina was defeated, the army was overthrown, and Britain won, and it seems that the winner is Britain, but in fact, it is the same situation that will happen if we use force to recover Nansha now.

To use an inappropriate analogy, even if China can win a naval war with the United States, how can it stand up to declare Hawaii ours? In addition, there is no winner in the war itself, maybe the United States may have it when it fights soft-footed shrimp like Afghanistan and Iraq, but what if the United States and Russia fight? Not anymore.

The same is true for the United Kingdom and Argentina.

1 No, the world pattern has changed, the relationship between the United States and Afghanistan has also improved, China is on the rise, and the United States is taking its backyard very seriously.

2 The British said it was his, and he found out first.

Argentina said that the island of Malvinas is within the extension of the continental shelf and should belong to Argentina.

3 The United States came out to say a few words, and the United Nations came out to say a few words, asking all parties to exercise restraint and solve the problem through dialogue, but it is not necessarily effective, and this problem will plague Britain and Argentina for a long time.

4 The sharp contradiction began in the Falklands War of the last century.

5 The question is comprehensive.

To put it simply, hehe, Britain is no longer a powerful military country, and it is very difficult to attack Argentina across the ocean without the help of the Americans, not to mention that it is very difficult to send it to the Falklands, and then the United States may not necessarily help, and there is the financial crisis and the fact that Britain has sent troops to Afghanistan and Iraq, does he have the money, so Britain will definitely not be able to afford it financially in the fight, and it will not benefit him at all.

As for Argentina, the military strength of Argentina, which has not paid attention in recent years, I think it should be improved, but it is also a problem.

War is a land that costs money, and without a strong country's economic strength, it is a loss to fight a war, and it is not necessarily winn.

Quite simply, if the United States dares to help Britain fight Argentina, we will dare to sell arms to Argentina, and we are not afraid of them.

The United States is not stupid, it can't throw away its own backyard, it supports the words of the United Kingdom, and all of South America is against him, isn't this dismantling itself?

Therefore, to sum up, big battles cannot be fought, and small military frictions may exist.

First, no, Argentina and Britain are both international powers, and they can't fight at the moment. Second, I ask the United Nations to decide, but I think Argentina should have the most mining rights, and who should be the closest to it. Third, another multinational talks will be held, and this time the United States will still be peacemakers.

Fourth, look at the history of the Falklands War. Fifth, there is never a winner in war.

Not at all, it's just a bluff, and many people think that it can be exploited when they see the so-called oil reserves report, and they don't want to think about the harsh natural climate and closed traffic near the Falklands.

The Anglo-Argentine dispute over sovereignty over the Falklands has been going on for a long time. Historically, the Falklands were discovered in the 16th century, but there are different accounts as to who discovered them and when. A believes that in 1520, Gomes, a Portuguese member of Magellan's expedition, first discovered the Falklands.

The British believe that it was first discovered by the English navigator Davis on August 14, 1592, aboard the ship Hope. When the Englishman John Strong came to the island in 1690, he discovered the strait between the two large islands in the east and west, and named it "Falkland Passage". After that, the British called the island the "Falkland Islands".

In 1764, the French established a settlement on the East Island, naming it the "Malo Genne Islands".

The Falklands War, the Apocalypse (Artillery Fire, Phosphorus, Phosphorus), Cavity Sun Xing.

Anglo-Argentine War.

Queen. The sea and air battle of Ying-Akai Zhengma Island.

The Battle of the Falklands ended with the defeat of Argentina. Compared with the British army that fought thousands of miles, the Afghan army fighting at home had a large number of soldiers disarmed and surrendered. In addition to these reasons that can be seen at a glance, the morale of the Afghan army is not as high as that of the British army, and the fighting spirit is not as firm as that of the British army, which is also an easy reason to find.

On April 2, 1982, Galtieri ordered Argentina to send troops to occupy the Falklands, and the Falklands War officially broke out. The war ended on 14 June when the commander of the Argentine garrison, Major General Menendez, surrendered to Major General Moore of the British Royal Marines.

A total of 74 days were played.

April 2 to June 14, 1982 Up to 2 months and 12 days.

Twenty-five years have passed since the Falklands War between Britain and Argentina that began in early April 1982. The war ended with a British victory and a defeat for Argentina. On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Falklands War, the British claimed that the Falklands War was "one of the most memorable events" for Britain since the end of World War II, while Argentina declared that it would never abandon the Falklands, and the two countries fought a diplomatic war over it.

Around this small island of several thousand people, the grievances between Britain and Argentina continue.

Differences are expressed not only in the name of the same archipelago, but also in different views and disputes over their ownership.

On April 2, 1982, the "Battle of the Falklands" between Britain and Argentina over sovereignty over the Falklands turned the dispute into a war. Margaret Thatcher, then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, sent a fleet to respond to the move of General Galtieri of Argentina to regain the Malvinas Islands. After 74 days of gunfire, the war ended with a British victory.

Is this a war worth it, or is it not worth it? Is it a war that must happen, or is it a war that can be avoided? Twenty-five years later, the dispute over sovereignty over the island remains unresolved.

On 2 April 2007, both Britain and Afghanistan held official events to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the end of the Falklands War, either to meet veterans of the war or to reaffirm their sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands. And those who decided, commanded, fought, and opposed the Falklands War still hold on to their answers to these questions in different ways.

Britain won, however, the losses in the war were not small.

Britain won. But Argentina still played something.

Britain won, Argentina surrendered unconditionally.

The dispute between Britain and Argentina over sovereignty over the Falklands has a long history. The island was discovered by the Englishman John Davis in 1592, but Argentina believes that the Portuguese Gomes discovered it in 1520. In 1690, the Englishman John Strong discovered the strait between the east and west islands, named the Falkland Channel, and named the archipelago the Falkland Islands.

At the beginning of the 18th century, a large number of French people came to the island, which was called the Malloyne Islands, which were later converted into the Spanish Malvinas Islands. In 1764 the French established a settlement in the East Island, and in 1765 the British established a settlement in the West Island. In 1766, Spain bought the East Island from France for 250,000 pounds, and in 1770, Spain sent troops to occupy the West Island.

In 1816, Argentina declared its independence, claiming Spanish sovereignty over the Falklands.

In 1832 the British occupied the West Island and the following year the East Island. Since then, there have been many negotiations between Britain and Argentina over the sovereignty of the Falklands, and in 1982 the negotiations between the two sides broke down and war broke out. The war lasted 74 days, from April 2, when Argentina sent troops to occupy the Falklands, to June 14, when it was recaptured by the British, and the war ended.

The impact is that we must do a good job in national defense.

The root cause of the Anglo-Argentine battle was the stupidity and self-indulgence of Argentina.

Can you imagine that stupidity will have an impact on the world military?

Root cause: Sovereignty over the Falklands.

Impacts: 1 Increased Britain's international standing; 2 New requirements were placed on the air defense capabilities of the Navy.