Is it reasonable that the neighbor s wall is crooked and kills passers by, and the relatives of the

This is completely reasonable, first of all, when the neighbor knows that his wall is dangerous, he does not show the warning sign and warning line, and stones the passerby to death, and he must be fully responsible, and the relatives of the deceased should compensate, which is completely reasonable and legal.

It is reasonable, first of all, the wall of this house is crooked, which is already a dangerous building, which is equal to the source of danger, and secondly, there are no protective and early warning measures, so the relatives of the deceased have the right to apply for compensation.

That must be reasonable, and the law will support it, because the wall belongs to your home, not to mention that you have to compensate for smashing people or smashing things, that is a human life.

It may be reasonable, or finding the police station can solve the problem.

I have a slightly different opinion, the passerby who was stoned to death, to the owner of the wall, to ask for compensation, this is legal, but in dangerous buildings, you must declare the dangerous house to leave for demolition, otherwise, you don't want to die, don't take your life and property seriously, it can kill passers-by, it can also stone you to death.

This is reasonable and legitimate. If the wall tilts or even collapses due to poor maintenance, the owner of the wall should be responsible for all the losses caused. Because from the perspective of passers-by, he did not know that the wall would fall and fall on himself, but the owner of the wall should be well aware that his wall has a safety hazard, so the owner of the wall should be responsible for such an accident.

Is it a public wall or your own? Whether the wall is in disrepair or not, these have to be considered.

If the homeowner is jointly and severally liable, the severity needs to be determined according to the circumstances;

The natural collapse of a public wall is an accident, and the appropriate liability for compensation can be based on the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 86: Where the collapse of buildings, structures, or other facilities causes damage to others, the construction unit and the construction unit shall bear joint and several liability. After the construction unit or construction unit makes compensation, if there are other responsible persons, they have the right to recover from the other responsible persons.

Where a building, structure or other facility collapses due to reasons attributable to other responsible persons, causing damage to others, the other responsible persons shall bear tort liability.

Article 24: Where neither the victim nor the perpetrator is at fault for the occurrence of the harm, both parties may share the losses based on the actual circumstances.

In this case, you still have to consult a lawyer, find evidence that is beneficial to you, and you can't blindly trust others, so it's better to find a lawyer to consult more reliable

Negotiate first, you can go to court to sue!

After negotiation, if it fails, take the legal route.

Why did it fall? Was it a neighbor who deliberately pushed it down?