What does the 30 year old son and father say about the fight?

It shows that the son is very disrespectful. His father is the most immediate family member in his life, without his father, there would be no him, the grace of nurturing has not been repaid, there is no pension to send him to the end, and the legal responsibility has not been completed, which is a great unfilial piety for this son. As the saying goes:

The nose smells and can't be cut. His father can't beat him if he's not a good child. Not to mention his father, who is a few years older than him, even his eldest brother can't fight, it must be his father.

It shows that the relationship is definitely not good, it still depends on the situation, although the son should not try to hit the father at any time, but sometimes, the father is too much, and he does it first, then there is no way, only self-defense.

First of all, I think that this child is not filial, as the saying goes, filial piety is the first, no matter how you say it, you should not start beating the old children, most of the young people now are educated and knowledgeable people, you can be reasonable, communicate with your father! To build a harmonious society, we must all keep a clear head at all times, be calm and not impulsive. Assault is a legal responsibility.

It shows that this father has not educated his son well since he was a child, how to respect his relatives. Perhaps this father used to do the same with his own fathers.

Filial piety comes first, can beating Lao Tzu's son still be considered a person? Kneel at the door of the house and wait for my father to wake up! Beg.

Not only is the relationship not good, but also the son is not filial, and beating each other is beating each other, no matter what, the son can't beat the father, the son is 30 years old, and the father should be in his 60s.

It depends on what the situation is, if the father is not a thing, it will be in vain to beat him, I support, if it is something else, then the child is not a human, it is a beast.

In fact, there is no need to guess what they can say about the fight, because the bystanders are not the parties and do not understand their lives.

The son is wrong. Whether the father is right or wrong, he should not hit the old man, so the son is wrong.

The relationship is not good, the father may not be good to him, and it is not too late for a gentleman to take revenge for 10 years.