Let s talk, is Einstein s general theory of relativity correct?

Einstein's theory of relativity is correct. For example, the theory of relativity has no meaning in describing black holes, or the behavior of particles in the microscopic world is not much to do with the theory of relativity, and it is full of contradictions with another great theory, quantum mechanics. The current situation of the theory of relativity is like Newton's entire classical theory, it is just some special solutions under the framework of the theory of relativity, which means that there may be more advanced theories to include the theory of relativity in the future, and the future is still waiting to be discovered.

Definitely right. There is a lot of evidence to prove the theory of relativity, and scientists like to use deductive reasoning as a scientific proof method to test whether a theory is correct or not. Thus, the problem of the century of Mercury's precession, the detailed explanation of the twins, the bending of light rays through massive celestial bodies, the time lag of atomic clocks around Earth's satellites, and the detection of gravitational waves in recent years, their subtle changes are all consistent with the theoretical calculations of the theory of relativity, and these evidences are enough to show that the theory of relativity is correct.

Whether the theory of relativity is correct or not can only be said relatively, and in the past when we were still in the solar system, it can almost be said that it is incorrect when we leave the solar system. I don't have anything to say about the speed of light, but time and the speed of light are two completely different concepts, and time should not be measured in terms of the speed of light. The description of the curvature of space-time is basically wrong.

Because time and space are also two different things, they can't be connected together, and another one said that a planet with super mass will bend time and space, which is not right, a large mass can only be a large gravitational force, and time is not linked to gravity, the speed of light, and space, time and magnetism are closely linked, and the time we use now is only applicable to the solar system, and out of the solar system is another time system, so Einstein's theory of relativity is almost wrong.

Einstein proposed the special theory of relativity and the general theory of relativity in 1905 and 1915 respectively, and until now, in nearly 100 years, it has been verified by various experiments and proved to be correct. The essence of special relativity is that it is impossible for any object with mass to reach or exceed the speed of light, and if one is willing to abandon the concept of absolute time, the concept of light aether since Aristotle is purely superfluous, time is relative, and the speed of light in a vacuum is the highest speed of the universe. Speed and time are mutually transformative, when the speed increases, time slows down, on the contrary, when the speed slows down, time becomes faster, and their combined speed is always the speed of light, so, suppose an object reaches the speed of light, then the object's time stops, which can be understood as time is completely converted into speed.

General relativity is the theory of gravity. Because the special theory of relativity depicts motion within a uniform inertial frame, and accelerated motion is not included, Einstein recognized that accelerated motion and gravitational potential are equivalent and indistinguishable in performance, so the theory that includes gravity, that is, accelerated motion, becomes general relativity. The general theory of relativity not only explains the anomalous proximity of Mercury's perihelion at 43 arc seconds, but also the gravitational lensing and gravitational clock slow effect, which have been well verified in high precision.

However, general relativity and quantum theory have not been able to reconcile so far, and from this point of view, there may be some flaws in general relativity, and there will be more precise theories in the future, which are not as good as superstring theory, but it does not mean that general relativity is wrong.

Absolutely. When we see a star at 5 billion light-years, its actual location is not where we are 5 billion light-years. It may be larger or less than 5 billion light-years.

This opens up the possibility of galaxy travel. In fact, this question is easy to theorize, the distance between the Earth and other planets, from the farthest to the closest, varies greatly. If we choose the right timing, we can greatly shorten the time it takes to go to other planets.

The same phenomenon applies to galaxy travel. Although it is impossible for any aircraft to exceed the speed of light in absolute terms, the curved space-time allows for the best interstellar travel path. Those so-called billion-light-year galaxies may not be far away.

As far as I know, the main present points of the theory of relativity are correct. However, due to the misunderstanding of the concept of space-time, the understanding of the structure of space-time and the problem of time travel is not comprehensive. In my opinion, Einstein's theory about the curvature of space-time is correct.

Because in my opinion, time is the flow of energy, and space is the energy field. Time runs in space, and space is made up of time. However, due to the difference in light travel, the information carried by the time traveling at the speed of light does not match the speed of the celestial body.

All planets and galaxies are revolving around a massive core, and the universe should actually have a region with relatively concentrated mass, and all galaxies are actually doing rotational motion.

After so many years, I think Einstein's general theory of relativity is still very correct.

These statements are all from the level of principle, all from the West! It also shows that you are a student and disciple of the theory of relativity! But the vast majority of us (ordinary people) oppose Einstein's general theory of relativity, consciously or unconsciously oppose him from the institutional level, he is 100% correct in principle, but he is 100% wrong in the fact that he destroys the absolute unity of the time dimension of mankind!

In terms of the scope of application of the theory of relativity, there are many observations or experiments that have proved its correctness. Of course, no scientific theory is omnipotent, and its scope of application cannot be expanded at will, otherwise it will be wrong; At the same time, no scientific theory dares to be said to be perfect. So there are many people who have pointed out that special relativity is correct, but it is not perfect.

Einstein's theory of general relativity is correct in terms of results, but it is one-sided in terms of the whole. What causes such a result, the general theory of relativity is not clear. The reason why any object in the universe moves in one way or another is not because the massive object bends space-time, but because the moving object is collided with particles of different sizes from different directions.

At the same time, it is also collided with particles radiated from massive objects, and it is this collision that prevents the objects from approaching the massive objects.

General relativity and special relativity are relatively correct, because there is no absolute right way to explore the universe.

The curvature of space-time equals theology.

The cause of the object's motion should be analyzed by force. What is the difference between a space-time bending explanation without a force analysis and a theological explanation?

At least until newer theories appeared, the general theory of relativity was correct.

Why do you care about the rights and wrongs of other people's theories? If someone is wrong, doesn't it give you the opportunity to design the right theory?

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, and the only way to test it is to see if the relativity theory does not conform to objective laws. The principle of invariance of the speed of light, the theory of space-time curvature conforms to objective laws. According to objective laws, Einstein is not wrong at all.

The general theory of relativity is a law of the universe explained by scientific methods based on reality, and no one can deny a correct theory. The general theory of relativity conforms to the laws of motion of the existence of the universe. The purpose of proving Einstein wrong was nothing more than an attempt to establish an imaginary idealism and establish their spiritual pillars.

Modern quantum mechanics proved Einstein wrong with quantum entanglement because Einstein did not recognize quantum entanglement, saying that God does not roll dice. Is Einstein wrong, or is their quantum entanglement not at all there, it is clear that superposition states are not objective, quantum entanglement does not exist. Ordinary photons are artificially given energy, and they cannot exert huge energy on photons whose mass tends to zero, and they think that they can entangle giant energy when they are entangled, which obviously violates the law of conservation of energy.

Under the spiritual pillar of imaginary idealism, even if they are clearly wrong, they will also think that they are right, and in this way, idealism has a paralyzing effect. An entangled photon with a mass tending to zero is not the movement of a beam of photons, and it cannot travel much distance, let alone an infinite distance. It is believed that entangled photons can not only travel to distant places, but also carry out telepathy, as mysterious as they are.

At an infinite distance, there is still a moving force to arrive, and after the force arrives, to change the state of existence of the other party, is there objectively such a great force of change?No one can prove it from a distance. Giant energy is entangled after giving energy in a human way, and ordinary people dare not imagine, only modern quantum mechanics have to imagine, and imagine that giant energy will appear around them.

With the entangled power, their so-called technology, the so-called theory will eventually be shrouded in mystery, Einstein is wrong in their imagination, the mysterious quantum entanglement is established in their imagination, and together with them, they will also become gods.

Not entirely correct, it successfully confirms that there is a curvature in space, but it lacks a basic description of force in principle, and instead forcibly explains it with a blunt law. Albert Einstein said that it is a natural law that mass causes space to bend, but it is impossible to explain why space can be bent. In order to mechanically explain the broad phase, four-dimensional mechanics must be used, but in this way the structure of space changes.

The four-dimensional space-time of general relativity becomes a purely spatialized four-dimensional space, and the whole set of theories becomes a completely new set of physics.

The theory of relativity is correct, Einstein once said that the gravitational pull of celestial bodies is generated by space distortion because mass affects time, and science has confirmed that gravity also affects time, so gravity is related to mass, as long as the mass is greater, the greater the weight, the greater the degree of space distortion, and eventually the gravitational force is generated, and he also said that speed affects time, which is also true, because the faster the speed, the slower the time process.

The theory of relativity is correct for now, but it cannot be said to be 100 correct, like Newtonian mechanics, can you say that it is wrong? No, it's just that the scope of application of Newtonian mechanics is so large, it is incorrect to exceed it, and the theory of relativity is the same, there will definitely be theories with a wider scope of application than the theory of relativity in the future, and what human beings have to do is to continue to explore the mysteries of the universe.

The theory of gravity in the general theory of relativity is wrong, because the theory of gravity in my article "The Periodic of Elements and the Causes of Gravitation" can perfectly explain various phenomena, such as why the speed of light is so fast but cannot escape the gravitational pull of a black hole, etc., and I also perfectly answer the relationship between gravity and mass, volume and distance.

The process of derivation of the theory of relativity is completely correct, and there is nothing to doubt about it. As for space compression, it's just a feeling, the speed is faster, the time spent to travel a certain distance is less, and the distance traveled with the same time is farther, the so-called space-time compression is here, of course, it takes energy to get speed. The faster the speed, the greater the energy.

The theory of relativity is based on the theory that the fraction d can be reduced, i.e., the speed of light is constant (x=ct,x'=ct'That is, the position is equal to the moment of velocity multiplied by time, and the four-dimensional space-time of relativism, the invariance of space-time intervals, etc., are all products that can be reduced by the microelement d, so whether it is special relativity or general relativity, they are all fallacies.

From the point of view of the conclusion of the theory launch, the later theory is always more correct! As for the theoretical premises and methodological processes, science does not need them to correspond objectively either! To put it bluntly, science actually allows guessing the right conclusion with the wrong method, and then also allowing the wrong interpretation!

Of course, it is inconvenient for the scientific community to say this directly, and always try to avoid this statement in the expression! See for yourself!

As for reaching the speed of light time at rest, this is correct. The simple formula of time dilation calculates that no matter how time passes in the outside world, its result tends to be infinite. On the other hand, this shows that for photons, or electromagnetic waves, they have no concept of time, and their moment is eternal.

Einstein's general theory of relativity profoundly revealed the original basic appearance of the world, and brought bright science to Chinese science, especially for the introduction of black holes and white holes and energy equations, which are one of the few classical scientific explanations, and the scientific community admires Einstein without doubt, but he forgot that quantum mechanics is not all wrong, but is only deeply excavating, which is the only one that Einstein made a scientific mistake that absolutely negates quantum mechanics.

One part is true, the other part is wrong. In the case of the conservation of mass e=mc 2, this formula is wrong when the limit is exceeded.

There are limitations, many constants are of the solar system, and some unclear "fixed values" calculated by multiple parties, one of them may change. What I mean by this is that replacing constants with something substantial would be more scientific, like mass m

In 1922, seven top astronomical teams went to Australia to make a second argument, Eddington in England, and a Japanese writer in the United States all argued that general relativity was correct, and you asked that proves that you don't even know what general relativity is.