Do you think the skills of the people should be kept secret?

Proper secrecy, I think it is necessary, after all, if a skill is rotten, then it can not be called a national tradition, can not be called a real excellent cultural heritage, he should have a certain selection threshold, that is, should not let everyone learn easily, there should be a selection mechanism, to confirm that these people are suitable for learning this skill, and then give it to them, of course, you can't cherish it yourself, that is, to pass these things only to your children, and then no outsiders will tell them. Then it is very likely that after a while, after a few decades, your craft may be lost, because your children don't necessarily want to make it.

I think the skills of the nation should be kept secret. This is relative to the current situation of ethnic minorities in China, because the population of ethnic minorities in China is sparse and most of them live in poverty, and they have a skill that can also make some preparations for improving the quality of life, and can also be a symbol of national cohesion.

I don't think a good national skill should be kept secret, because if you keep it a secret, you won't be able to let everyone know the merits of your introverted national memory, and it may lead to a certain skill of that nation not being passed on. I think good things should be shared with everyone and passed on from generation to generation.

I think the skills of the nation should be kept secret. Because this is a culture that we have inherited for thousands of years, it is a very precious treasure, and as the artistic and cultural heritage of our nation, we must protect them and let them give full play to their greatest value. Be sure to take them very seriously.

I think that national skills should be kept secret from the outside and passed on internally, because now there are many national skills that are gradually lost in history, and more and more young people choose to go out to start their own businesses and work hard, and will not want to settle down to inherit these skills, but these memories are valuable cultural resources, if no one inherits them, they may be forgotten from generation to generation after many years.

I feel that the skills of the nation should not be kept secret, because if you keep it secret, it is easy to lose your own cruelty, and it is easy to lose this skill, if it is not kept secret, everyone feels that the skill is very good, and the skill will be carried forward, and this skill can be preserved.

I think that the more national things are, the more they should be displayed, and they should be carried forward in the open. In ancient society, because there was no effective property rights protection, everyone had to choose to hide their skills, and only their most trusted people could inherit them, but this inheritance method greatly restricted the development of skills, and even lost in the long river of history. Now that the society has a high degree of civilization and property rights protection, these national skills can rest assured to expand their influence.

Of course, it should be preserved, and the skills of the nation not only belong to a certain region and a certain nation, but also the cultural treasures of the country and even the world. It represents the level of human civilization and cognition, and is a visible spiritual wealth that can reflect the creator and the characteristics of the times. It can also be preserved for future generations to study and learn about the culture of a bygone era.

Is this the problem? Well, now there are no advanced countries that do not keep their national skills secret, and this debate topic was also in the early days of reform, and now, there is no need to discuss it.

Many skills have been lost because they are too "secretive", such as the carving on the peach pit. Moreover, the improvement, improvement and transmission of skills cannot be done by one or two families, since it is a national skill, it should be shared by the nation.

If it were me, I would first think about it from the perspective of patent rights, and then think in the direction that scarcity is expensive, and protecting national skills is equivalent to protecting a kind of trade secret.

We should make a good distinction between applying for a patent and keeping secrets, because the more national it is, the more global it is. Even in the practical sense of today's society, there are still things in today's world that have secrets in today's increasingly high-tech world.

Distinguish between "whether or not to keep secret" and "whether to apply for a patent". Pointing out the "secrecy" of the other party is also to protect traditional crafts, but protection is not the same as self-isolation. Secondly, development is the best protection, only by improving itself, can the national skills be inherited and developed to the greatest extent.

Thirdly, in today's increasingly extensive cultural and artistic exchanges, the way out for protecting traditional culture and developing national skills lies in applying for patents rather than secrecy.

If you fight harder, is the "inheritance" of national skills considered confidential? In other words, what level of behavior can be called "secrecy"? You can ask for a quantifiable criterion.

The key is whether "secrecy" should be chosen as the only way to protect national skills, and if not, then what should be done, such as applying for a patent.

Counter-argument: Maybe applying for a patent can protect the national craft. However, there is a time limit for patent rights, which is generally five years. In other words, after five years, this skill must be made public, so that everyone can learn it; That's no secret.

But think about it on the other hand, if everyone knows it, can it still be regarded as having national characteristics? Suppose the clay man, if everyone knows it, the street is full of clay people, and everyone is a Monkey King at will, can it still be regarded as a national skill?

The reason why national skills are precious is because they are in the hands of a few. Why keep it secret, it is also because he is precious, if everyone learns it, it will not be precious. Even if you apply for a patent, it is useless, because you still have to disclose it when the time limit is up.

Positive rebuttal: Secrecy means that only one person knows, and the second person does not know. Well, the question is, if there is really only one person who knows, then how do you know this national skill?

Secrecy, for what?

Secrecy has always had only one role to gain a competitive advantage, whether it is military or commercial, secrecy has only one role, that is, to gain a competitive advantage.

National skills, if you want to prove that it does not need to be kept secret, then, there are only two ways to prove it:

1. It doesn't need competition, so it doesn't need to be kept secret.

2. Secrecy does not give him a competitive advantage.

You can ask each other questions about these two points.

For example, you can ask the other party, the secrecy of national skills is kept secret from whom, and once this "who" obtains the secret of national skills, can it have any competitive impact on our nation?

The dissemination and comparison of national skills is conducive to the promotion and development of national skills, the exchange of national culture and the promotion of national economic spirits.

Resting on one's laurels, self-appreciation, no benefit to the development of national skills, mystery is not the embodiment of artistic beauty, the real beauty is the resonance in people's hearts when the skills are displayed.

The secrecy of the skill only sees the immediate benefits, but the disclosure of the skill will obtain more long-term benefits. So it's better to go out with skills.

In today's globalization, the integration of skills and even culture has become an inevitable trend.

From my personal point of view, I believe that national skills should be made public throughout the country, so that national skills can be passed on and developed, and national skills do not have to be made available to the world.

There are two main reasons why national skills cannot be kept secret nationwide, but should be made public nationwide.

As the so-called folk masters, many lost skills are said to be lost, but in fact, they are still the essence of them in the hands of a small number of people.

If these people choose to keep it a secret, if they have children, they can pass on their craft, but if their children and grandchildren do not do it, there is a good chance that the skill will be truly lost.

It would be a great pity for us if a superb national skill really disappeared completely.

Although folk skills cannot and will not be widely spread in a large range, because after all, this is the craft of a certain family, which embodies the efforts of a family. But we still need to find a few people who can inherit this craft, relatively openly, so that this craft can continue to be passed on.

But on a large scale, all over the world, we don't necessarily have to make our national skills more public.

Unique national skills can be recorded in the history of the world and become the image of a country, which means that it is something unique to this country.

Once we make our own things public, there is a high risk of ownership disputes.

It is reasonable for other countries to imitate national skills, but if some countries imitate them, they will be very angry if they change the developed national skills to their own national skills, and decide to publish them.

It should be open for everyone to learn, because this kind of thing is rare after all, and the national skills can be passed on through the Internet.

The best thing is to make it public for everyone to learn, so that these folk skills can be prevented from disappearing, and more publicity can be intensified to carry forward these folk skills.

Of course, it should be open for everyone to learn. In this way, the national culture can be well propagated, so that these national cultures can be inherited perfectly.

Let everyone learn openly because there are fewer and fewer people learning these things now, and it is difficult to pass on the words that have been kept secret.

I think it should be kept secret so that this traditional culture can be preserved and at the same time people can be in awe.

National skills are a kind of technology or art cultivated by folk artists or craftsmen in the long-term research and work exercise, including some handicrafts, works of art and the like.

1.Believe that it should not be kept secret.

Folk skills are now in an endangered period, many famous folk artists have passed away but there is no heir to spread their skills, for example, the death of the flower-cutting lady Ku Shulan is undoubtedly a big loss of paper-cutting art, but the art of paper-cutting has now been spread to a certain extent, it is still very dangerous, not to mention other crafts hidden in the folk, the disappearance of many folk crafts is with the death of only a few artists and disappear, this town is a huge loss to the culture of the Chinese nation, It is equivalent to a loss of culture that has been accumulating.

After thousands of years of folk crafts, there are many feudal concepts in it, such as passing on men but not women, which is not conducive to its development, so it needs to be made public.

2.Thinks it shouldn't be made public.

Folk skills were originally developed by several skilled people through continuous training and research, for example, the face change in Sichuan Opera was originally secretly learned and disseminated, which can make Sichuan Opera more watchable and mysterious, but now some outsiders can also learn face changing stunts, which makes Sichuan Opera retain the secret and watchability for many years. This is very detrimental to the development of Sichuan opera. An art needs to have a secret, so that it can be better and more profoundly transmitted.

Folk skills have very strict requirements for successors, so as to ensure that the quality of folk skills is guaranteed in the inheritance, so that they will not be overflowing. Return.

No. If you have selfish intentions, apply for a patent.

If you are not selfish, you will return to your society.

If it can be made public by Lu Zhenqing, it must be retained.

Forehead. Forgive the travel letter for my nonsense. However, this is the most dialectical.

Sissy