Is the Ogiura car smashing incident real? Ogiura smashed the car and dispatched anti riot troops

The fake one is that the bus does not pay the fare, and the hired thugs beat the people of Ogiura to death, and they are still unconscious. The people of Ogiura did not smash the car, but only prevented the bus from hitting people and unloaded the tires. Now tourists have a hard relationship, and they have to catch more than 70 people from Ogiura.

Four people have now been arrested.

The recommendation is true, Ogiura charges parking fees indiscriminately, the problem is that the bus does not park your parking lot at all, well, and then the bus wants to go, the villagers do not let people go, and they have to pay thirty yuan, and then they quarrel, Ogiura people have a temper, you also know, a word does not agree with the start of the action, tourists also have young men who can't stand the fight up. As soon as there were many people, one person fell down and hit the ground on the back of his head, and he was in a vegetative state, I don't know what happened now, and it is estimated that it will be difficult to live. As soon as this person fell, hundreds of people in the whole village came out, and they had to pull down the people in the car and kill them when they smashed the car.

Anyway, I think it's a hooligan.

Ogiura people are too enthusiastic, the tourist bus stopped for 4 minutes, you have to charge 30 yuan, the driver called the police, the people of Ogiura beat the police, the tourists all beat up, the bus also smashed, Ogiura people, good!

The person recommended above, I guess it's the gang that fought, a parking fee collector in Ogiura was beaten and is still in a coma in the hospital, lacking humanity, it's him!

Why don't you talk about the fact that the people of Ogiura are not dead or alive, it is that the bus does not pay the fare, and the thugs are hired to beat the people of Ogiura to death, and they are still unconscious. The people of Ogiura did not smash the car, but only prevented the bus from hitting people and unloaded the tires. Now tourists have a hard relationship, and they have to catch more than 70 people from Ogiura.

Four people have now been arrested.

Can't you stop it with force after smashing the car?

In fact, these are basically hype.

Don't put too much faith in these things.

It shouldn't be so unlucky, and I don't smash the car now.

Chinese have a habit of forgetfulness. Booing.

Go buy it with confidence.

And smashing the car itself is not the right behavior, there is a kind of smashing your own car, I admire you.

Whether or not to bear BAI legal responsibility depends on the collision.

Du's past actions were considered justified defense.

If the DAO blocks the road and smashes the car, it is enough to threaten.

Inside to the person's appearance. I think it's okay to hit it.

If it is only for the purpose of smashing the car and there is no high danger to the person, then the defensive behavior can only be limited to stopping the opponent, and cannot kill or maim the opponent.

Although I didn't go back to studying law, I have cases around me. Smashing a car is destroying your property the most for you.

More is to stop the other party. If the other party also injures you incidentally, then the justifiable defense clause cited by the lawyer can be used. But ......However, domestic jurisprudence is not optimistic about the injured party (the defending party), so please stop or fight ......back after the other party hurts you firstI can't go on.

I hope there are no bad people in the world.

If you need to pay legal responsibility, he did not endanger your life, nor did he commit a violent crime, but only destroyed your property, you can stop it, but you can't kill or maim him.

Knowing that the other party came to "smash the car" and killing or disabling the other party, he must bear criminal responsibility. The incident was not within the scope of justifiable defence, and there was no excessive defence. In essence, the other party only smashed the car and did not hurt anyone.

If you are suspected of excessive defense, the other party infringes on your property rights and does not endanger your personal safety, and if you drive into someone or directly endanger the other party's life, such defensive behavior clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major damage, you shall bear criminal responsibility.

The two examples you gave are both excessive defense, the perpetrator only infringes on property, and the serious consequences caused by dao only constitute the crime of intentionally destroying property, but you are defending his body, and the object of obvious infringement and the object of defense are not equal. You can use appropriate violence to control him, prevent him from violating him again, and prevent him from escaping, and report to the police for handling.

If he resists violently or transfers the victim to your body while controlling him, you can use violent defense, but the degree of violence can only be limited to suppressing his violent behavior, otherwise it constitutes excessive defense.

If you hit someone to death, you may be considered to have defended yourself too much.

It doesn't matter if you are disabled, it is a big deal to be killed, and it will be okay to drive over directly, whether you are dead or not, it is best to have a dashcam in the car to see it as evidence.

No! We must be responsible for the law.

1.First of all, it is necessary to report to the police, use mobile phones and cameras to record and record audio, and retain evidence. Expert.

2.It is not possible to do illegal things on the grounds that he has violated the law in the first place, and only law enforcement agencies can use means to combat crime.

3.Any means of countering violence with violence are not protected by law, and there are limits to legitimate defense.

Be calm.

If you get out of the car and kill or maim someone, you will also have to pay legal responsibility, because that is not legitimate defense.

The Pisces man is afraid of being rejected if he speaks out. Because they have a poor sense of security.

I really don't like Jay Chou, the songs he sings are so tasteless. If there is a rhythm and no melody, you know that there is a random roar, who can't roar, who of you can't roar? **Is there feelings, his song feelings are in**?

Does any of you know? Maybe people who liked to join in the fun when they were young would like it. But is it really like his songs?

Or do you want to be hilarious because you are afraid of being lonely and want to be lively, so you shift to liking Jay Chou's songs?