After the dissolution of the marriage by illegal cohabitation, does the woman pay the man for the el

After the dissolution of the relationship, the woman is not obliged to support the elderly for the man. If the woman voluntarily supports the man's elderly, it is estimated that she will not be paid; If the man entrusts the woman to support the elderly for him, then the woman can be paid.

As for the issue of the woman giving the man the elderly, it is also the relationship between the woman and the elderly, and whether or not to pay is also a matter between the woman and the elderly, and it has nothing to do with the man who illegally cohabited.

Whether the woman is paid to the man for the elderly after the dissolution of the marriage after illegal cohabitation depends on whether the woman voluntarily accepts the support of the man for the elderly. Since the marriage contract has been dissolved, the man can not be given the pension. If you give the man a pension, you can ask the man to pay you accordingly.

If the woman voluntarily raises her, she will not be paid, and if the remuneration is negotiated in advance before the elderly are raised, it is equivalent to an employment relationship, and of course it must be paid.

It depends on your relationship, if it is a legal husband and wife relationship, she has obligations, and if it doesn't matter, she needs to be paid.

Pro, dissolved the marriage relationship and still give people the elderly? Even if there is no remuneration, you should be grateful, both parties should discuss it, see how it is appropriate, voluntary is better, generally good, how did it get like this?

No pay! Either voluntarily or in advance to negotiate things,

The legal basis for the return of the bride price is Article 10 of Interpretation II on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China: "Where a party requests the return of a bride price paid in accordance with custom, the people's court shall support it if it is ascertained that it falls under the following circumstances: (1) the parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities; (2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together; (3) Payments made before marriage and causing hardship to the payor. The provisions of subparagraphs (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be applied on the condition of the divorce of both parties".

Cohabitation is not protected by law, so it cannot be considered joint property.

No, it's the man's, the bride price is for marriage, you are not married now, and you have no joint property.