Is it appropriate for the school to punish in this way, and what is the impact of the school s punis

To sum up, what you mean is: because you didn't go to the first inspection, the school won't let you take the test.

If you explain it roughly: first of all, the school's approach to her is reasonable, because he did not do what the school asked.

But when I think about it, I won't be allowed to take the test just once if I don't arrive at school, and I really don't understand how important this inspection is. This punishment is a bit far-fetched and overbearing, because the inspection is not directly related to the final exam. Only if you don't attend classes and don't sign in, the school can cancel your exam qualification according to the regulations.

Advise your friends:

Explain the reason clearly to the school, pay attention to the tone and attitude, but the reason and the logical relationship must be explained clearly.

Then find a way to make up for this inspection (I don't know what to check), and if the school doesn't agree, let the school come up with a way to make up for it.

I guess if you play a little more, the problem is easy to solve!

If the remedy proposed by the school is difficult for some strong people, or even does not propose a solution or does not negotiate at all, it means that the school is deliberately making things difficult, and there is no attitude to solve the problem, and the school does not think about the students of the school, in this case, I suggest you go to the school leader, or directly sue!

These are just some suggestions, no matter what method you use, your friend must find a way to figure out what the nature of this inspection is, and then negotiate with the school!

I wish you can sue, first of all, you must prepare a lot of evidence and materials, hire a lawyer, and write a lawsuit, which will take a lot of time, money, and experience, and the final result is not good, because there are not many cases in which the civil prosecutor wins the lawsuit.

It's better to solve it in a low-key way, personal advice!

To put it simply, if you negotiate with the school, you will not have an advantage, and when you go directly to court, you can only stand on the same level of negotiation, and generally the school will give in considering the image.

This is a problem that costs money to solve, and if it goes to court, there are 2 results. Can you take the other one?

The school is half a society, and if the school dares to do this, it will think of the consequences.

I hope your friend gets his diploma successfully.

What can you do if it's not suitable! Can you change the school's decision?

School punishment is a way for the school to punish the students under its management when they violate the school regulations, according to the severity of the five forms including warnings, serious warnings, demerits, school probation and expulsion, general warnings, serious warnings and other punishments will eventually be revoked, and will not have much impact on future work and life.

Article 13 of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Civil Servants Law Civil servants shall meet the following conditions:

1) Have the nationality of the People's Republic of China;

2) Be at least 18 years old;

3) Supporting the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the socialist system;

4) Have good political quality and moral character;

5) Have the physical and psychological qualities to perform their duties normally;

6) Have the education level and work ability that meet the requirements of the position;

7) Other conditions provided for by law.

Legal Analysis: School sanctions are divided into: warning, serious warning, demerit, probation and expulsion.

During the school period, after the student is punished by the school, through his own efforts, as long as he does not repeat the mistake. After a certain period of time, the student who has been sanctioned may submit an individual application to the school to request that the sanction be revoked. After the school decides to revoke the student's punishment after investigation and research, the school's student affairs department will withdraw the punishment materials from the student's student registration file.

If you do not apply for revocation of the disposition at that time, you can still apply to the school for revocation before graduation. If both opportunities are missed, the disciplinary record will be with the student record for the rest of your life.

Legal basis: Article 51 of the "Provisions on the Management of Students in Ordinary Institutions of Higher Learning" The school shall give criticism and education to students who have violated laws and regulations, these Provisions, or school discipline, and may give the following disciplinary sanctions depending on the severity of the circumstances: (1) Warnings; (2) Serious warnings; (3) Demerits; (4) Probation; (5) Expulsion from school.

Because the high school student received food from his parents, the school considered this behavior to be "against school rules" and decided to give the student a punishment of expulsion.

I think it's true that student takeaway is against school rules on this issue. However, after criticizing this behavior of the students of the school, we should not make a big fuss. The real purpose of education is to let students truly recognize their mistakes and correct them, rather than cutting off students' paths because of some small faults and mistakes.

After all, the students were just takeaways, and the behavior itself did not cause obvious harm.

But for unknown reasons, only one day after the punishment decision was issued, the school responded that the punishment decision had been canceled and that the students involved had been attending classes normally.

However, the question is, if the child is locked up in school, can't the parents cook a meal for the child? Even if there is a risk, I will not drop out anyway. Serious criticism is indispensable. I believe that both students and parents can understand the school's requirements and will not make the same mistakes again.

As we all know, there is a lot of pressure on schools to prevent epidemics, but this is not a reason to punish students at will. The student's behavior did not cause serious consequences, and the school arbitrarily imposed a punishment on the student who was withdrawn from the school, which was too serious and arbitrary.

In the name of epidemic prevention or whatever, heavy penalties were imposed on some students for their "unruly" behavior, and the punishment could be canceled if it was said to be canceled. It's too capricious to use this kind of power. Therefore, I think the punishment of hail is too heavy.