Ask someone who understands marriage law to help a friend who understands marriage law to help

Updated on society 2024-05-25
18 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It depends mainly on your attitude, and according to what you say, he will not get custody of the child easily. Your advantage is that you have a regular income and a regular guardian.

    It has been for many years that you have been raising children. The existence of these advantages is something that custody cannot be easily changed. According to the conditions for change of custody under the Marriage Act, unless you are mentally ill, have no income, have a contagious disease, child abuse, etc.

    You are normal now and you are also very good with the child, so, please rest assured that the child is yours.

    I wish you happiness and happy growth of your child!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    If you sue for the benefit of your child's growth and life, the court will support your claim. Also, you can ask the father to pay child support after the divorce. Don't worry, you have a regular income and it's good for your children and your mother's growth. Custody of the child is definitely yours.

    If you are often out of town, it is not very optimistic. However, you can talk to him about custody and child support, ask him to pay a little less child support, give you custody, and remember to sign the agreement. Or take your child with you. In addition, so will your child's wishes in court.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    If you sue for the benefit of your child's growth and life, the court will support your claim.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    You can prove that he is at fault.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    I'm not a mom yet, but I understand your feelings. You can consult a lawyer, explain the situation to the lawyer, believe that you will win, "the greatest mother's love in the world" can be fully reflected in you; In addition, I would like to give you a suggestion, now your child should be in primary school, the child is growing up day by day, and you are working outside again, don't forget to communicate with your child more. Bi Jing's single-parent child has been traumatized since he was a child, so let him grow up happily, hard mother, God will give you blessings.

    Bless you ...

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Here are five general situations in which a court should grant a divorce under the Marriage Act:

    1. One party is bigamy, or cohabitation with another person, and the court shall support the other party's request for divorce 2. Committing domestic violence, or abusing or abandoning family members.

    3. If one party has gambling, drug abuse and other vices, and refuses to change after repeated teachings, divorce shall be allowed4. If one party has been separated for two years due to emotional discord, it shall be allowed.

    5. One party is declared missing. Divorce should be granted.

    Since you are not wrong, then try to appear in court, civil lawsuits are all after the defendant receives a copy of the court complaint, the defendant needs to file a reply within 15 days, but you don't file it, it's okay, the divorce is the court must mediate first, there is no forced divorce without appearing in court within a week.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The court may seek a default judgment.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Let's appear in court to respond to the lawsuit, it is a loss to be tried in absentia. If you have done nothing wrong, have not been separated for too long, and you think that the relationship is still there, she may not win the case.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    You can make a judgment in absentia if you don't go to court, I'm a lawyer!

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    In response to your questions, our lawyer provides the following answers:

    1) Since you have been separated for two years due to emotional discord, then the conditions for the breakdown of the relationship between husband and wife have been met, you can file for divorce or negotiate divorce;

    2) If you don't go back, your marriage will always exist, which will affect you to start a new family. Besides, he can also sue you, and if you don't go back at that time, the court can announce service of service and default judgment.

    Now it is best not to let him know about your pregnancy, because this will definitely prove that you have an extramarital affair, which will be unfavorable to you in the divorce, and the court will award you less or pay the other party damages when dividing the property. Of course, he can't force you to do a ** test, you just don't let him know about your pregnancy, it's better to do it early, because when your child is born, it will be more beneficial to him, he will apply for a paternity test, and if you don't cooperate, it will have adverse consequences for you.

    It is recommended that you agree to divorce as soon as possible.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    You call this an extramarital affair, and the law only recognizes the facts of who was right and who was wrong. Divorce by mutual agreement is a little better for you. Long pain is better than short pain.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Hello, if you have cohabitation with the opposite sex outside of marriage, and cause pregnancy, this belongs to the marriage law stipulates that the divorce is invalid through mediation, if you can't live with him, you can choose to divorce, after all, it is also a painful thing to drag on.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Your actions have violated the relevant provisions of the Marriage Law, and if your husband wants to sue you for divorce, you will bear adverse consequences.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Hello! 1. Zhang and the man are in a cohabitation relationship, and their relationship is not protected by law.

    2. The man and Li are a legal husband and wife, and their husband and wife relationship is protected by law.

    3. Zhang has no right to demand compensation from the man.

    4. A man shall pay maintenance for his two daughters.

    5. Men are not considered bigamy.

    6. For Zhang's behavior, the man can call the police or go to the court to sue.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    1. A fair and just solution: The man and Li called the police. Or the woman, Zhang, went to the court to sue the man.

    2. There is no violation of the marriage law. There is no bigamy involved.

    3. The woman's conduct has constituted a crime and involves criminal issues.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The marriage between the boy and the woman Li was legal. The boy and Zhang have no relationship legally. However, the two daughters born to the man and Zhang were born out of wedlock.

    Extortion, intimidation and threats are all offences and are criminal offences. So the man and Li can report the case or go to the court to sue. Of course, it would be best if the man and Li were willing to settle peacefully with Zhang.

    After all, the man and Li's behavior was immoral. But it's not illegal. (Because I didn't get a marriage certificate.)

    The relationship formed by the two is not protected by law).

    Zhang and the man did not violate the marriage law, but they still have to bear the obligation to support the two daughters born to Zhang, and they need to pay child support every month.

    The man and Li are governed by the marriage law. Because Li is pregnant, generally speaking, a man cannot file for divorce within half a year after Li is pregnant and gives birth.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Cohabitation is not protected by law. However, as long as you have children, you will be protected by the law as if you were married. Therefore, children are treated as legitimate children.

    In this case, if the lawsuit is brought to court, the court will demand that the man be the father, and the child can be asked to pay for the child's medicine to the court and ask the man to bear it, and at the same time, how old is the girl, and whether it meets the legal standards for women to marry.

    Article 1 of the Interpretation of the Marriage Law (II) stipulates that if a party requests to dissolve a cohabitation relationship, the people's court shall not accept it, and if the parties file a lawsuit due to property division or child support disputes during the period of cohabitation, the court shall accept it.

    A common-law relationship is not a marriage and is not protected by law. According to this provision, after a dispute arises, the "second wife" or the "third party" cannot have the same status in the division of property as the divorced parties. This means that when the parties divide the property, they can only divide it according to the general property, that is, according to the respective shares of the parties in the property.

    Among them, the joint property must be proved by relevant evidence.

    2. A de facto marriage may be formed in criminal law.

    If the parties have been living together as husband and wife, and one of the parties has a spouse or is openly cohabiting knowing that the other spouse already has a spouse, they may be held criminally liable and sentenced to bigamy if the victim initiates a private criminal prosecution.

    3. The situation where both parties to the cohabitation are unmarried.

    When the parties are not cohabiting, the property can only be divided according to the general property, that is, according to the respective share of the property of the parties.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Dizzy, only the child is born to two people. Must be raised up to 18You can win without a lawyer. A little bit of lawyer common sense, isn't it?

Related questions
10 answers2024-05-25

For the question of whether the marriage can be maintained, others can't help you, you need to think about it yourself, marriage is not child's play, I hope you can be responsible for yourself and your family. If you are considering a divorce, you should learn more about all the joint property between you and obtain relevant evidence. Then you can apply for property preservation first, in case he transfers property, about the problem that he has a woman outside, you can't just listen to others outside, if there really is, then you should obtain relevant information before it can be used as evidence. If you really can't go on, it is recommended that you go to a law firm and find a professional lawyer to ** your case.

10 answers2024-05-25

Where a party requests the return of the bride price paid in accordance with custom, the people's court shall support it if it is ascertained that the following circumstances apply: (1) the parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities; (2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together; (3) Payments made before marriage and causing hardship to the payor. The application of the provisions of items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be conditional on the divorce of both parties. >>>More

7 answers2024-05-25

Article 10 of Interpretation 3 of the Marriage Law stipulates that if one of the husband and wife signs a contract for the sale and purchase of immovable property before marriage, pays the down payment with personal property and takes out a loan from the bank, and repays the loan with the joint property of the husband and wife after marriage, and the immovable property is registered in the name of the party paying the down payment, the immovable property shall be disposed of by agreement between the two parties at the time of divorce. >>>More

9 answers2024-05-25

Based on the legislative spirit of the Marriage Law and relevant legal knowledge, combined with the specific practice of judicial and legal application, and in accordance with the structure and system of the Marriage Law, covering a series of major contents stipulated in the law, the parties and specific circumstances in the case are processed, refined, condensed and the necessary technical treatment, and then some questions are raised to explain the relevant knowledge of the Marriage Law in a targeted manner.

23 answers2024-05-25

Questions about the first property. Although the house was allocated to Party C through an agreement, there was no transfer, that is, the gift was not completed. At this time, the ownership of the house still belongs to Party A and Party B, and Party A owns half of the corresponding value of the property; >>>More