In the face of the three noes of middle aged marriage, should we let go?

Because once you get it, you don't work so hard.

As long as you see if two people understand and don't know how to continue to improve.

You really shouldn't let it go.

I think such a marriage should be let go.

I think it's still okay to let go.

Summary. There are some studies that suggest that sexless marriages in middle-aged couples can lead to more psychological stress and emotional problems. If you are experiencing this, I recommend that you communicate openly with your partner to understand their thoughts and feelings.

There are some studies that suggest that sexless marriages in middle-aged couples can lead to more psychological stress and emotional problems. If you're going through this, I recommend having an open and honest conversation with your partner to get an idea of what they're thinking and feeling. If you need more help from Mega Potato, please consider seeking professional advice from a Mega Doctor.

Can you add, I don't quite understand it.

Whether it is necessary to maintain a sexless marriage for middle-aged couples is a very personal and personal issue that needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis. A sexless marriage can also be an intimate relationship if both parties are willing to maintain the relationship and have other common interests, hobbies, emotional interactions, etc. However, if one of the spouses is unhappy with the relationship or is unable to take it personally, it can lead to a breakdown of the family relationship and negative consequences.

In addition, it should be noted that if the inability to have sex is due to physical or psychological reasons, it is recommended that both spouses actively seek medical help to find a solution to the problem. If the marriage is sexless due to emotional reasons, it is necessary for both spouses to communicate and find ways to solve the problem in order to maintain each other's relationship and family relationship.

When people reach middle age, they belong to the three no-marriages: there is nothing to say, no quarrel to quarrel, no sex life, which is extremely bad for the relationship between the two parties, if there is a problem, the other party must communicate in time.

When people reach middle age, such a marriage belongs to the "three-no marriage": there is nothing to say to their partner, nothing to quarrel with their partner, and they are unfaithful to their partner.

When people reach middle age, such a marriage belongs to the "three-no marriage", that is, if you want to quarrel, the other party ignores it, finds an opportunity to chat, and the other party does not care, and is unfaithful to the marriage.

A marriage with neither savings, nor true love, nor children is a failed "three-no marriage".

No. My wife and I are living very well, although the middle-aged people are old and young, but we can't ignore the emotional management with my wife, whether it will create a small surprise, and my wife can be happy and the family can be more harmonious.

Of course, my marriage is still the same as before, there is only one him. I don't have a child of my own, I am in a daze every day, I don't have a house, and I rent a house everywhere to live.

When I reach middle age, I can also be regarded as a three-no marriage, I feel that I have nothing but an empty shell of a home, and I don't know what I am living for in this life.

I'm not a three-no-marriage, but I don't think there's much difference between the three-nos and the three-no, so I don't have to think about it.

I don't think so, middle-aged is not the reason, feelings and marriage need to be cultivated and taken care of by both parties, rather than left alone.