What would be the devastating consequences if all the snakes on the earth were destroyed?

Snakes are reptiles with vestigial limbs.

Animals, widely distributed on the earth, there are 3,425 species of snakes in the world, and 241 species in China. This is a very successful species that has evolved, but it is less evolutionary, they can adapt to a variety of environments, and they vary widely in size. Blind snakes from a minimum of a dozen centimeters long.

to a python that can be up to ten meters long.

Wait. Human beings are naturally afraid of snakes, and this thing engraved in the bones and genes is inherited from our ancestors.

We know that all living things on Earth are in the food chain.

They are both predators.

At the same time, it is the prey of other animals. The extent to which the disappearance of a species affects the entire natural world depends on its importance in the food chain. To put it simply, the food chain is not a single one, but more like a web.

There are multiple animals at each level, and they are both competitive and substitutionary relationships with each other.

We know that most snakes eat mice, so if snakes disappear, the number of rats will increase relatively well, and the number of other animals that feed on rats will also increase. But with the disappearance of snakes, the number of animals that specialize in catching snakes will be greatly reduced due to the reduction of food. For example, meerkats.

Snake carvings and the like mainly make a living by catching snakes. Of course, natural ecosystems.

It's very stable, and it doesn't collapse just because it disappears into an animal, but it does have an impact.

These effects can take hundreds of years or more to return to a stable state. Of course, all snakes disappear and rats will become rampant, which will have an impact on crops, etc., but their numbers will not continue to grow, in addition to human participation, there will be more other animals to join, because for some other animals, snakes will inevitably look for other prey, at this time mice may be a good choice.

Of course, the food of snakes in different regions is also different, this is only a food chain relationship on the grassland, and in other ecosystems, the food chain of snakes is also different, and the disappearance of snakes will inevitably affect this small ecosystem. The impact of all small ecosystems will affect the entire earth and the ecosystem, and human beings will definitely be affected by the disappearance of snakes, and of course this broken balance will slowly recover, but it will take some time.

will cause the eventual destruction of the earth. The disappearance of the snake causes the snake's predator to die without food**. It will also be the food of snakes, rats, etc., which is growing rapidly, resulting in an imbalance in the ecosystem.

Snakes eat mice, and snakes will reproduce in large numbers without mice, causing rats to run rampant and eat a lot of crops, which will be particularly chaotic.

All living things have their reasons, if they are killed, it will destroy the ecological balance, especially the rats in the countryside, it will be flooded, there will be more and more frogs, these animals will steal food, gnaw crops, and also carry a lot of viruses and germs, causing great damage to people's lives and life safety.

The earth is the land on which we live, and there are many seemingly ordinary animals living here, which do not seem to be beneficial to human beings, and have no obvious effect on the biological world. It seems that the existence of these animals seems to be a bit redundant, and if one day, if this animal disappears, it may not be harmful to humans, of course, until we see any scientific explanation, we can only make guesses or assumptions.

First of all, the disappearance of snakes directly led to the flooding of rats, and then the entire agricultural chain collapsed, the farmland ecosystem collapsed, and the grasslands were ravaged by rats, resulting in a heavy blow to animal husbandry, and then the wooden structure of human houses and wires were destroyed by rats, if humans have no way to stop the rapid growth of the rat team, (or other natural enemies of rats also disappeared) the consequences are unimaginable, if you want to return the ecosystem to balance, it will take at least tens of millions of years, can humans be in the rat "army" Survival under aggression depends on the creation of a link in the snake's food chain and the maintenance of ecological balance. For example: grass--- rat - snake --- mongoose.

It's a food chain, and if the snakes are gone, the rodents multiply, and the plants are eaten up quickly. At the same time, meerkats that prey on snakes are also in decline due to a lack of food.

Snakes play an important role in the ecological balance, promoting the material cycle of the ecosystem, helping plants to pollinate and dispersing seeds.

The presence of snakes can effectively curb the development of rodents, and snakes themselves are also food at the top of the food chain.

Snake venom and serum can be used for medicinal and R&D purposes.

The real harmless should be the Aedes mosquito, flies and German cockroaches, American cockroaches, etc., they really do not affect the food chain, it can only be said that this is used by nature to restrict a certain kind of life to over-destroy nature**.

This will disrupt the order of the biological chain, and may lead to the extinction or proliferation of other organisms.

Rats will occur and plagues will occur, which will make it difficult for humans to survive.

A small fly is not only a food for geckos, frogs, spiders, etc., but more importantly, it can play a role in decomposing animal carcasses and purifying the environment, and it cannot exterminate snakes. Every life has the value of existence, the extinction of a species will increase exponentially, the ecological chain is destroyed to a certain extent, even if human beings save it, it will be too late, and there is nothing wrong with protecting wild animals is protecting ourselves. Countries have invested heavily in the establishment of nature reserves, and Yellowstone makes sense.

So many scientists, politicians, know more than we do.

If all the snakes on the earth are wiped out, then the future ecosystem will be completely destroyed, and then there will be unpredictable consequences.

Disruption of the food chain. The rat population increases, the food decreases, and it takes a long time to recover.

Humans are rich and have cats, but they don't take care of their parents, and cats don't catch mice, there are no snakes, and the mice will gradually mutate in its kingdom and grow into pigs, and cats don't care, and some people are not afraid of cats, and cats can't care about them at that time. People have long been overwhelmed by the need to stop the proliferation of rats, and regret that they did not take care of the mouth of the snake-eating snake.

The number of rats on the planet may increase in large numbers, leading to ecological imbalance with serious consequences.

Every kind of living thing on the planet maintains the balance of the biological chain, and when it dies, the ecological chain is destroyed, and then there is a lasting effect, and the human race dies.

You can't get rid of the snake!! Snakes eat rats! If the snake is destroyed! Crop grains in the field will be eaten by rats!! It will completely endanger human life! Every living creature in the world has its own range of life! The ecology must not be unbalanced!

If you do this, you will cause damage to the ecosystem, and the corresponding natural enemies will increase.

Maybe the ecological chain will be broken, and there will be an impact on nature.

Then there will be more and more pests in the crops, and the biological chain will be broken.

The consequence is that no one will ever be bitten by a snake again.

If all the snakes on the earth are eliminated, the dominoes will be toppled by one, and the creatures are all interlocked, then the eagle will have no food, which will slowly lead to the extinction of the eagle, and the frog will have no natural predators, which will cause the crops to wither and the biological disorder.

It will lead to a flood of rats, because rats will grow wildly without natural predators, which is definitely not good.

It will cause a disorder of the ecosystem, because they are all interlinked.

All living things on the earth have biological chains, and if one end of the biological chain undergoes a devastating change, the entire biological chain will lead to a state of paralysis, which is not conducive to maintaining the balance of the species.

Then there is a state of imbalance of species. Because snakes are the natural enemies of many animals, if they become extinct, then it will cause other animals to overflow, and the biological balance will be broken.

When snakes are wiped out, animals that rely on snakes as predators may become infested.

After all, they are all a species on the earth, and their eradication still has a certain impact.