Does a mother have the right to make decisions on behalf of her child?

She has the right to intervene when the child is a minor, and the right to make her own choices when the child is an adult.

Where's the child's father? Didn't mention the kid's dad from beginning to end! If you don't make decisions for him, will you let the child make his own decisions? If the child has the ability to think about thinking, try to let the child think about the problem and let the child call the shots! Now it's up to you!

You can go, you can go, you don't want to go, but if you don't want to go from an outsider's point of view, it's a bit unreasonable.

Don't take the baby in this case.,I feel like I want to use him to collect more red envelopes.。。

Mother's love comes first, and others can't surpass mother's love.

As long as the child's father has not lost his civil capacity, then he is the child's legal guardian and has nothing to do with ......the child's grandfather

The blood relationship can't be broken, how can he sue you when he's old, I'm the same as you, my father doesn't want me, and he beats my mother, I can only see it later, don't think so absolutely, besides, how much will I pay in the future?

Don't let yourself think too much about the future.

Children have an obligation to support their parents, and if they fail to do so, the father may seek maintenance.

The Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, amended by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress in April 2001, stipulates that parents have the obligation to raise and educate their children; Children have an obligation to support their parents. In the event that a child fails to fulfill his or her maintenance obligations, the parent who is unable to work or who is in difficulty in living has the right to demand maintenance from the child.

Otherwise, he can go to court and sue you.

It should be absolutely effective, and not raising is a moral crime.

It is difficult for a clean official to judge family affairs, and he does not recognize his parents as rebellious and unfilial.

The mother is incapable, and what about the father of the child?

In principle, if the child's parents are still alive and basically normal, the grandparents have no legal obligation to support them, and of course, the relatives can negotiate separately.

Hello, this is provided for in the General Principles of the Civil Law.

Article 16 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulates that "the parents of minors are the guardians of minors. Where minors' parents are deceased or have no capacity for guardianship, one of the following persons is to serve as guardian:

1) Grandparents;

2) brother and sister;

3) Other close relatives or friends are willing to bear guardianship responsibilities with the consent of the minor's father's or mother's work unit or the residents' committee or villagers' committee for the minor's residence. ”

Therefore, if the mother really does not have the ability to raise her, she can leave the child to the grandparents to raise.

The son is the legal guardian of the grandson, and if he believes that the grandfather's contact with the grandson is not conducive to the healthy development of the grandson's physical and mental health, he can refuse the grandfather's request.

He is the first guardian of his son. When the child is still an adult, he has every right not to let his son associate with others.

I think he definitely has a right, because he's the father of his grandson, so he has a right.

……Sort of. As a guardian, you have the obligation to educate and protect. And there is no visitation right for the next generation.

Do you have the right not to let your grandchildren and grandfathers come and go? I don't think it's good to have a right in this regard.

The son is the legal guardian of the grandson, and he really has this right.

Such a son wants his son to follow suit in the future! People who don't talk about family affection will be spurned by people.

Does the son have the right not to let the grandson associate with the grandfather?

If the father is still alive, it is generally his father who inherits his grandfather's property, and it is not the grandson's turn. If his father is gone, he can be subrogated from the throne.

According to the law, the grandson is the legal heir regardless of the arrival, unless the grandfather has a will.

Because the grandson is, after all, the grandson of the grandfather.

If the grandson has not changed his surname, he should consult a lawyer for the specific inheritance rights.

Of course, it is the child's parents who have the final say, the child's mother has the most right to speak, the child is born by the mother, and the child's growth is that the father cannot be without the mother, it is so important, of course, this is my personal opinion. Now the child is small, it is just a question of who takes it, but when he grows up, it is different, it is a question of who educates. If the child grows up next to the grandparents for a long time, it is inevitable that he will be spoiled, and the child's parents will be blocked by the child's grandparents if they want to educate, and then there will be conflicts.

I'm talking later, but now that you've thought about who will take care of the children, it's good to think a little longer. Having said that, if you are due to work, it is inevitable that you will hand over your children to his grandparents from time to time, that is also a must, and the role of grandparents should be played at this time, and you don't have to be polite to them at this time. Children's education is a difficult problem, what I said is what I have summarized after being educated, I hope it will help you...

Of course, the parents have the final say, and it depends on who is more convenient, it is best for the parents to bring, although it is harder, but it is the best for the child.

Of course, it is the parents who have the final say. Is that a direct leader after all? There is a saying that the county management is not as good as the current management.

Personally, I think it's up to you whether you recognize it or not, if the child is a single-parent family, because of work problems or other problems that will affect the distance between the child and the child, as a mother, you still have to pay more attention, care, care. In this way, unnecessary problems will be avoided.

Children need the love of their parents at every stage, and more care and contact is not a matter of recognition or not, but it is related to the growth of children. If the child recognizes it in the future, but because there is less love and too much rebellion, the mother will also be very sad.

When the child grows up, he will definitely recognize his mother, and he will support his mother, but he will be unfamiliar in terms of emotion. Before the child is 15 years old, the parents almost do not live with the child, and when the child grows up, there is almost no affection between the two generations, leaving only the father-son or mother-child relationship in the legal sense. Therefore, do not hinder parents from living with their children for various reasons, and must find ways to live with their children more before the age of 15 and cultivate a good relationship with their children.