My house will be 3 years to 20 years, will it be renovated at that time?

The old house is old, the transformation of the community is a long process, three years must not be all renovated, must depend on the specific transformation time of your community, if three years later, then your house can also be transformed.

I can't say for sure at the moment, it depends on the policy in three years. If it is an old and dilapidated house, usually the state has allocated funds to help it every year for maintenance and repair. Let's see how the local ** is implemented.

His house will be 20 years old in three years, and there will be no problem of renovation in 20 years, and we know that the large property right of the house is 70 years, and the small property right is 50 years. There is no problem with the 20-year-old house, and if the renovated houses in the shantytown are also dilapidated houses.

If there are three to twenty years, it can be transformed, and it can be done within 50 years.

The property rights of buildings in the city are generally 70 years, so there is no problem of renovation for 20 years. If it is a rural house, whether it can be renovated in 20 years should be based on the local planning.

If it is a rural area, it should be a poor household recognized by the civil affairs department, and the state will give a subsidy of about 10,000 to 20,000 yuan for reference if the dilapidated house can be renovated.

This thing is not necessarily difficult to say. This is the policy of the state, and it will change according to the change of policy. If you follow the current policy, it can be transformed. Retrofitting needs to be carried out in batches. Don't rush, take your time.

Your house is still 3 years old and 20 years old, and I don't know if your house is in the city or the countryside. A 20-year-old house is generally not remodeled.

Judging from your description, if the house is old or dilapidated enough, you can definitely apply for renovation.

Three years has been 20 years, no matter how well the transformation is, you have to think about how to plan, there are some places that will have regulations.

Whether to give renovation or not depends on whether your house is a dilapidated house, or the appearance is too old, such as problems such as peeling exterior walls.

If your house is in the factory for 20 years, it will not necessarily give you a 70-year property right, if your house is rural, then you have to pay for it yourself, but you have to apply to the housing authority.

Now the house is for renovation, after 20 years is also for renovation, now to renovate, as long as it meets the policy, it will definitely give you transformation.

The renovation of the house depends on the planning of the first department, if the plan is implemented, the house will be renovated no matter how many years.

This can only depend on the policy at that time, the life of the house is relatively long, and the house of 20 years can be lived in.

The house will be 20 years old in three years, and it will have to be renovated at that time, so it will be 20 years, what is the policy of anti-Japanese resistance, if there is a policy, it must be for you to renovate, and if there is no policy, it cannot be transformed.

If it is an old house remodeling.

Even if it's three to 20 years away.

There will also be a renovation of the old house, because this is carried out uniformly.

Oh, the renovation of old houses should be a national policy, although it can not be renovated every year, but it must be three years later, there should still be a policy.

The reason why you can renovate a dilapidated house anywhere is because your family's economic conditions are not good. If the economic conditions are okay, it will not be transformed for many years.

Not necessarily, it does not mean that the old house will be renovated after 20 years of purchase, you can ask the local authorities to see if your house will also be renovated.

There are still three or 20 years left in the house, and it can be rerouted at that time, of course, it can be changed, as long as it does not affect your personal safety.

As long as it is your house, as long as the local area is still being renovated, it can be renovated for you! This has nothing to do with the age of the house.

The average house is a 70-year property right, so after 20 years, he must be able to renovate.

A 20-year-old house can still be changed to wow, it can be transformed.

It should be, because when the time comes, it may be unified planning and transformation, and the policy will be relatively good at that time.

This friend is good, this foundation, the current development model will definitely have the opportunity to transform.

When your house is renovated has nothing to do with how many years it takes. If it is included in the unified planning of **, it is possible to demolish and renovate.

My house will be 20 years old in three years. Do you have to correct it at that time? The house will be 20 years old in the next three years. Wait until that time to see if it can be transformed. It depends on how the place is transformed and whether there is such a plan.

No matter how long the house is, the state says that there will be a chance to renovate, and the state does not say renovation. It's hard to have a developer to retrofit.

Yes, it should continue to be changed, but you can use the staff for details.

After all, it is a 30-40 year old house, and like people, he looks young when he wears new clothes, but he doesn't know that his internal organs have aged, and some may even suffer from serious illness. The difference between the internal facilities of old houses and the renovation of old communities and the transformation of shantytowns is that it is a voluntary and bottom-up process of residents.

Some people propose to demolish and build high-rise buildings, to analyze the floor area ratio, if the building floor area ratio is low, the building density is small, there is a certain feasibility.

<> but there are also disadvantages that the structure of the house is the standard of the last century, and the structure of the house is not as good as the modern design, and the high cost of demolition in the downtown area is the key, which includes the demolition of the old house of the age. Therefore, for some old houses, it is not necessarily all old renovation, and it may also involve demolition.

The sewage pipes are connected separately and the open pipes fall directly to the first floor, and the sanitary situation can be imagined, in addition, I saw with my own eyes that because of the fire in the building, the fire truck could not enter, and the connecting road between each building was narrow and cramped. All the illegal buildings in the community have been demolished, all roads have been hardened, the asphalt of the main road has been blackened, the beautiful green belt has been repaired, nearly 100 fixed parking spaces have been arranged in the community, the phenomenon of random parking of vehicles has been rectified, and the garbage bins are placed in an orderly manner.

I also know that the vast majority of the residents who still live in this old community are the elderly, the poor, and the people who cannot afford to move out. After the transformation of the appearance of the old community, the appearance of the house can be unified, the wall is painted, and the insulation layer is made, which is not very effective, and the face project is not good.

But the problem is who will pay for this rectification, and no one is willing to do this kind of ineffective expenditure for the owners, but the unit will come out, so how will the money come from?"The nouveau riche "just get a lot of compensation for demolition, and they don't have to take it seriously."

I don't think it's necessary. Because the walls of the old house 30 years ago are almost no longer strong, and there is no great point in renovating. So I think it's better to build a new one, which will save money and be more cost-effective.

There is no need, because such an old house is no longer suitable for people to live in, and even if it is renovated, it will only cost an extra amount of money, and it will not have any substantive effect.

A lot of young people nowadays don't like to live in old houses, if it's me. Especially the kind of old houses that are not very convenient for transportation, I may not be able to renovate them.

I think it is necessary to renovate, since it is my own old house, so there is a little feeling, and I can still live in it after the renovation.

Most of the residents who still live in this old community are the elderly, the poor, the people who can't move away, and the disadvantaged groups, in a word, people who insist on renovating old buildings. Coupled with the recommendation of the length of residence, the house is seriously aged. At this point, it will be more distinctly different from the surrounding new residential community.

Of course, it is necessary, because these old houses have many hidden dangers, so we must actively renovate them, so that we can live comfortably.

I think if you live in a house that you don't have a demolition plan, you can renovate it, after all, you still have to have a quality of life if you live by yourself.

I think that if my parents still want to live, it is necessary to renovate and create a good environment and living environment for my parents.

I don't think it's necessary, because it's very difficult to renovate such a house. And the cost will be very high.

I think it's necessary because it's more comfortable and safer to live in.