Do you feel that a righteous act that is not done for a righteous purpose is worth pursuing?

A righteous act that is not done with a righteous purpose is worthy of pursuit, because the result of this matter is relatively good, and there is no need to care about the original purpose of the other party. And people have a psychology, if their actions are praised, he will have a sense of satisfaction, and he will become better and better, and will not do bad things anymore, but only good things.

Speaking of this topic, I can't help but think of something shared by a netizen on the Internet, who cheated and got the first place in the class during an exam, was praised by the teacher, and the classmates looked at them with envy, and the parents also thought that their children had finally grown up, so they could study so well. Under all kinds of pressure, it proved that netizens began to work hard, did not dare to play at all, spent more time studying, and really became the first in the second exam, and was admitted to a very good university. It can only be said that every child has unlimited potential, and as long as there is a positive influence around them, the child will definitely be more motivated.

The same is true for adults, if you always say that this person is very useless or always does bad things, he will also have a kind of revenge mentality, and will not do good things anymore, but will continue to do bad things, otherwise he will bear the infamy in vain.

Nowadays, there are many strange things in society, for example, a thief entered a certain house to steal something, but found some prohibited items in it, and he immediately chose to report the crime and let the police come to the house to search. This is the real act of justice that does not serve a righteous purpose, and at first he just wanted to steal something, but when he saw the prohibited items, he had no way to steal them again, but obeyed his own wishes and called the police. Netizens said that this thief's heart is very good, not as dirty as his performance is at all, but he is always scolded, so he has such an appearance.

In some moments, good language can motivate a person, and those foul words can anger them and make them even more crazy.

I don't think it's worth pursuing, otherwise the atmosphere of this society will change, and our righteous actions must start from the purpose of justice, so as not to go astray.

It's not worth it. Sometimes the purpose is very important, and if it is not a righteous purpose, then there is a certain amount of selfishness, which may affect the final result.

Such an approach is not desirable and incorrect, and the right way should be chosen.

Summary. Hello, dear, I am happy to answer for you 1. Social development needs a sense of justice. We all want to live in a society full of justice, and the prevalence of unrighteous behavior will completely destroy our society.

Only when there are more and more people with a sense of justice will our society be more stable and harmonious.

2. Justice is the fine character of being a man, with an indestructible personality charm, and an irresistible spiritual force. A sense of justice will promote the formation of good habits and habits in society, and at the same time, it will also satisfy the needs of people's inner world.

Why talk about "justice".

Hello, dear, I am happy to answer for you 1. Social development needs a sense of justice. We all want to live in a society full of justice, and the prevalence of unrighteous behavior will completely destroy our society. Only when people with a sense of justice shine brighter and come to the army will our society be more stable and harmonious.

2. Justice is the fine character of being a man, with an indestructible personality charm, and an irresistible spiritual force. The sense of justice will promote the formation of good habits and habits in society, and at the same time, it will also be the satisfaction of the needs of the inner world.

In "The Definition of Neoliberalism," I would like to say that neoliberalism is based on inheriting the classical liberal economic theory of the bourgeoisie, with opposition to and resistance to Keynesianism as its main characteristic, and adapting to the theoretical trends of thought, ideology, and policy propositions required by the transformation of state monopoly capitalism into international monopoly and monopoly capitalism. Neoliberalism is both related to and different from classical liberal economic theory, and is known for its counter-revolution through the Keynesian revolution; The formation and implementation of the "Washington Consensus" is the main symbol of the transformation of neoliberalism from an academic theory to an economic paradigm and political program of international monopoly capitalism.

Then now the reason needs to be added.

First, the "newness" of neoliberalism is relative to Smith's classical liberalism, and the two are in the same vein. Neoliberalism advocates individualism, denies the function of the state to intervene in the economy, advocates the theory of "small **, big society", and advocates a laissez-faire free market economy, allowing the economy and capital to flow without restrictions. So, look at it from that perspective.

Neoliberalism is a remake of classical liberalism, which, of course, does not coincide exactly. Second, it is necessary to distinguish between neoliberalism at the academic level and the "Washington Consensus judgment" of neoliberal ideology. Neoliberalism is an important modernization theory, developed from classical liberalism, in a sense, it is a "revolution" of Keynesianism, especially its set of theories and policies on social development, which has had a profound impact on the West and developing countries.

It has undergone a process of transformation from pure economic theory to the empty form of national consciousness and mainstream values in the United States, so it is not possible to confuse academic neoliberalism with politicized neoliberalism.