-
Anonymous users2024-02-13A female engineer in Shaanxi was detained in 2018 for the crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble, and the female engineer even became the leader of the first local gang-related forces, and after many times, the female engineer was released on bail on June 16, 2020. A female engineer in Shaanxi Province reported the problem of household pollution, which is not a crime in theory, but the female engineer paid a serious price. The female engineer has been appealing and applying for state compensation, and now the application for state compensation has been accepted, including solatium for mental damages, compensation for infringement of personal freedom, and compensation for infringement of the right to life and health, with the amount of compensation amounting to more than 2.42 million yuan.
Some professionals explained that the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles evolved from the previous crime of hooliganism, but in fact, the crime of hooliganism is a rather controversial crime. The so-called crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles is very different from the crime of hooliganism in the past, and if individual public authorities are not satisfied, then the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles may be used to define a person's crime. In general, the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles mainly refers to causing trouble out of nothing, and if there is a reason for the incident, then it does not belong to the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles, and the behavior of the female engineer obviously does not constitute this crime, and it cannot be pursued according to the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles.
The crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles mainly refers to the destruction of social order, and the actions of female engineers are to seek justice for the villagers, and the relevant enterprises have destroyed the environment. If the villagers who fight against the enterprises are convicted and punished, then the law protects the interests of the enterprises involved, not the interests of ordinary people. <>
If female engineers are forcibly convicted, then the judiciary will not have a corresponding effect, and even the judiciary will become a tool to protect the enterprises concerned and a tool to crack down on the people. It is a good thing that citizens have a sense of social responsibility, and when their rights and interests are violated, people should use legal means to protect their rights and interests, and they can achieve their goals through petitions or reports. In the process of implementing the law, it should strengthen the guidance of citizens, and not too much suppression or punishment, if the polluting enterprise is reported, then the relevant departments need to rectify the polluting enterprise.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-12Because the woman was sentenced to prison for helping the villagers to achieve justice, the actions of the judicial authorities violated the woman's right to personal liberty and life and health, so the woman claimed to apply for state compensation, including solatium for mental damages, compensation for economic losses, etc.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11Legally, the woman needs to be punished, but morally not.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10From a legal point of view, the woman has been deprived of the right to political and personal freedom, and it is very necessary to apply for national compensation.
In today's society, there are all kinds of occupations, and in recent years, there has been a professional anti-counterfeiter, he refers to a profession that is to fight counterfeiting for the purpose of making money, by taking advantage of the expiration of goods or the problem of product loopholes deliberately in large quantities, and then through the fight against counterfeiting to require merchants to pay compensation for property. Some consumers will see them as heroes, while others will see them as profiteering. >>>More
The woman who helped the cooked vegetables was successfully appealed by the professional anti-counterfeiter in the second instance, and the compensation was ten times the sentence in the first trial, and the court of second instance ruled that the woman who sold the goods successfully appealed. The court felt that the professional anti-counterfeiter did not make a truthful statement in the course of the litigation, had obvious intentional personal behavior, and suffered negative feedback from the law, so it ruled that the professional anti-counterfeiter Xin lost the lawsuit. This matter has to start from December 18, 2021, the woman Hou helped the masses sell goods, Xin asked Hou to buy some cooked vegetables in the live broadcast and paid a deposit of 3,300 yuan. >>>More