Yuan Shikai once said that if you want to destroy Japan, you have to control this country, but now l

I think his idea is actually wrong, after all, Japan is not controlled by this country, and if you want them to surrender to a certain extent, you have to destroy them at all.

He wasn't wrong. But Yuan Shikai is very greedy. He wanted to be the emperor, so he harmed the whole of China.

I think that's right, because there is some truth and reasonableness in this idea.

I think Yuan Shikai's idea is indeed not wrong, but it did not destroy Japan at that time.

General Cai Yi led his troops to fight against Yuan, and Yuan Shikai's restoration ended in failure, and Yuan Shikai died.

Yuan Shikai was the general leader of the Beiyang warlords, and Zhang Xueliang announced the "change of banner", marking the complete destruction of the Beiyang warlords.

The "Second Revolution" initiated from Yunnan and dominated by Cai Yi

Personally, I believe that if the comprehensive level of the army is evaluated on a 100-point scale, Japan can reach 85 points in the era of Yuan Shikai, and Yuan's Beiyang Army is 50 points, while the other Qing Dynasty armies at that time did not even have a score, and the other armed guards are estimated to be unable to even defeat the Eight Banners Army in its heyday.

The first is morale, Yuan's Beiyang Army is a private soldier and has no national concept, who gives money to whom. The Japanese army has a strong sense of loyalty, and during the Russo-Japanese War in 1904, the soldiers were not afraid of death.

The second is training, Yuan's Beiyang Army claims to be well-trained, but from the level of warlord melee later, the Beiyang Army is only a little stronger than the Qing Dynasty Green Battalion soldiers, the most typical is that the foreign newspaper at that time said that "many Chinese soldiers do not know how to shoot, only know how to put it indiscriminately." That is to say, many armies do not know how to shoot, do not use rulers, and are just blind fighting.

At the officer level, the Japanese military has a relatively complete military academy system, and many martial arts halls in China invite Japanese officers to be instructors.

History has no assumptions. But if Yuan Shikai really didn't die, let him be in front of the big **, in terms of military flag deduction, the military strength at that time was still slightly weaker than the Japanese Army. However, if it can stabilize for 10 to 15 years, then its strength will immediately be stronger than Japan's.

After all, as long as the National Congress of China can be stable at that time, it will be able to cultivate a well-trained and powerful Beiyang Army in ten to fifteen years. At least in terms of political affairs, it is as rigid as it was during the Qing Dynasty. Looking at the government affairs personnel at the time of Beiyang ZF, the quality is very high.

It's just a literati, without a backbone, and no real control. If Yuan Shikai is here, there will be no warlord scuffle behind, and if something like the Kuomintang Northern Expedition happens, there will be less internal friction. The reason why Japan won the First Sino-Japanese War and the Russo-Japanese War was also an element of speculative luck, and it did not mean that its strength was outstanding.

Not worse than them, the tonnage is all surpassing them. There were foreign officers on both sides. However, Japan already has its own warships, and China relies on the first, and the two sides send personnel back from abroad, and China is not reused in Japan's important positions.

At the beginning of the war, the Chinese Navy did not think so, not realizing that it was the eve of the war, and the Japanese, although small ships, used wolf pack tactics to gain an advantage. The Chinese Navy's thinking was to reject the enemy, mainly because it was afraid that Britain and France would intercept it on the sea when they returned, and the navy at that time was still stuck in the idea of backward sailors, rather than a real navy. The navy is a sortie service, and Japan has a better sense of doing it than China.

The so-called dying of people is also good in his words, and the same is probably true for Yuan.

For Japan to go to a big enemy: He believes that if he dies, Japan will have one less great enemy, and his bitter hatred for Japan has made the Japanese Qin Shuzi, who signed the "21st Article", a "national shame day", in order not to forget this hatred. Before he died, he still remembered the foreign insult, which can be said to be blind to death.

Look at China's rebuilding of the republic: When he was dying, he thought that the imperial system was unpopular after all, and it seemed that he had to pin his hopes on the republic. Since my old Yuan, there has been no emperor in China.

But someone read it horizontally and read out the words "the great enemy of the republic", these four words were bound to him, and Lao Yuan was suspected of escaping and had no escape.