Can forensic identification fraud be recognized by braids?

In the settlement of claims for work-related injuries and traffic accidents, some people exaggerate their illnesses when they are sick, say they are sick when they are not sick, and even self-harm themselves by unscrupulous means to achieve their goals. As the paying party, there is often a fear that the other party will pretend to be "seriously ill" to defraud the other party of compensation.

So can this kind of "camouflage injury" be identified by a forensic doctor?

Absolutely.

Fraudulent injuries, fraudulent diseases, and contrived injuries are not uncommon in judicial appraisals. In forensic clinical evaluations, for some reason, the person being evaluated often disguises the injury or illness, exaggerates the illness, conceals the illness, or deliberately creates the symptoms and signs of some injury or illness.

Impingement is when a person in good health pretends or pretends to have a certain disease in order to achieve a certain goal. It can be seen in injury cases, victims or perpetrators of accidents. Fraud in a broad sense also includes exaggeration of illness, which is often manifested as minor injuries pretending to be serious injuries and minor illnesses pretending to be major illnesses, and the injured and sick hope to achieve a certain goal by exaggerating the illness.

It often has the following characteristics: clear purpose, similar symptoms, special condition, confusing presentation, far-fetched medical history, and uncooperative physical examination.

There are various forms of malingering, including faking headache, pseudo-deafness, pseudo-blindness, faking paralysis, faking psychosis, faking convulsions, faking aphasia, and so on.

Fraudulent injury or contrived injury refers to causing harm to one's body or instructing others to cause harm to one's body in order to achieve a certain purpose, or deliberately exaggerating or changing the original injury.

Characteristics of a contrived injury: having obvious signs and symptoms, mostly in areas that are easily accessible to one's own hand, causing injury in a particular part to indicate that the injury is under certain circumstances, and self-injuring people are generally not willing to risk their lives or become disabled.

In the forensic clinical evaluation, there is a special item: the identification of false injuries, fraudulent diseases, and artificial injuries.

Identification of fraudulent injuries, fraudulent diseases, and artificial injuries. Using the theories and techniques of forensic clinical science, the identification of false (exaggerated) injuries, fraudulent (exaggerated) diseases, and man-made physical injuries is carried out.

If it is suspected that the other party has disguised injury (illness) to defraud compensation or achieve other purposes, it can apply to the relevant departments and courts for relevant appraisals.

If there is a suspicion that there is a disguised injury (illness) in the disability evaluation, injury evaluation, etc., it can also apply for a new evaluation, and generally speaking, if there is a disguised injury (illness) in the evaluation process, a professional forensic doctor can identify it.

Any forensic forensics is illegal, and if you don't believe that the current forensic doctor can re-evaluate it with a different forensic doctor, and the results of the forensics are not the same, you can sue the forensic forensic doctor.

If you are not satisfied with the results of the forensic examination, you can request another forensic examination.

Legal Analysis: It is possible to commit fraud, but generally do not dare because it is perjury and may constitute a crime. Perjury Sentencing:

In criminal proceedings, witnesses, evaluators, recorders, or translators intentionally make false testimony, evaluations, records, or translations of circumstances that are important to the Senyuan case, with the intention of framing others or concealing criminal evidence, are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment or short-term detention; where the circumstances are severe, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment. Where perjury is given in civil litigation, the people's courts may impose fines or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances, and where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.

Legal basis: "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 305: In criminal proceedings, witnesses, evaluators, recorders, or translators intentionally make false testimony, evaluations, records, or translations of circumstances that are important to the case, with the intention of framing others or concealing criminal evidence, are to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of up to three years or short-term detention; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment.

Forensic results cannot be falsified. The system of appraiser responsibility is implemented for judicial appraisal, and those who falsify judicial appraisal must bear legal responsibility. Falsification of judicial appraisal results will be suspected of perjury.

The crime of perjury refers to the conduct of witnesses, evaluators, recorders, or translators in criminal proceedings who intentionally make false testimony, evaluations, records, or translations of circumstances that are important to the case, with the intention of framing others or concealing criminal evidence.

Providing incorrect appraisals, records, or translations for evaluators, recorders, or translators who are not honest and responsible in their work, are negligent, or have a limited level of expertise; and where false evidence is provided because of a lack of understanding of the true circumstances of the case, an inaccurate understanding, or hearsay and testimony, the crime of perjury is not constituted because there is no subjective intent of perjury.

With all that said, have your questions been answered!

Article 305 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: In criminal proceedings, witnesses, evaluators, recorders, or translators intentionally make false testimony, evaluations, records, or translations regarding circumstances that are important to the case, with the intention of framing others or concealing criminal evidence, are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment or short-term detention; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment.

The basic wheel girder will not, and the procedures of the appraisal agency are very strict. Of course, other possibilities are not ruled out. Number of waxes.

If you do not agree with the results of the forensic examination, you can apply for a new evaluation. As for the forensic examination results, it is difficult to determine that the slag is fraudulent. If the parties have sufficient evidence to prove that the judicial appraisal institution violated the law and discipline during the judicial appraisal period, they may file a complaint with the provincial-level judicial administrative department.