After more than half a year of the Russian Ukrainian war, can the Russian army still win?

The Russian army has always occupied the initiative; Over time, the warLibrasIt will be more and more inclined to the Russian side, and the Russian army will definitely win the final victory.

From the Russian side, Russia is a world military power.

The nuclear forces of the third-ranked military power can compete with the United States, and the United States does not dare to act rashly or openly confront it on this point. Judging by the comparison of military power, Ukraine.

And Russia is not in the same class. Moreover, Russia has a vast land, rich resources, a population of more than 100 million, and the country's comprehensive strength far exceeds that of Ukraine.

But Russia also has its difficulties. In this conflict, Russia's strategic purpose is to contain NATO's eastward expansion.

Strive to increase the buffer zone with NATO and increase the strategic depth of one's own country.

The ideal outcome should be a quick solution and be able to achieve its goals. Therefore, for Ukraine, it is a limited and moderate war, and the national mood of Ukraine must be taken into account, and the force cannot be too strong. In addition, in addition to its own countermeasures, sanctions against the West must also enlist the support of the rest of the world, although some are only moral.

As for Ukraine, because it is in the middle ground of the struggle between the two major forces, it can be handled properly to be left and right. However, due to the lack of strategic politicians in the country, the West borrowed national sentiments to co-opt and provoke them, resulting in a leaning towards the West, causing Russia's uneasiness and causing this Russia-Ukraine conflict.

From the Ukrainian side, through Western countries.

In particular, the pro-Western and anti-Russian sentiment in the western region is rising, and there is a certain will to resist, especially the demand put forward by the Russian side during the negotiations for recognition of the territorial issue.

They are hard to accept. Coupled with the continuous assistance from the West in order to consume Russia and even drag it across Russia, especially the ** support, it has also greatly improved the Ukrainian side's will to resist. In addition, Ukraine was also the former Soviet Union.

The second largest union republic.

Its military and economic strength was quite strong, but it has since plummeted, but the foundation is still there, and with Western aid, its strength has also been restored to a certain extent.

1. The United States and the West do not dare to fully intervene and openly send troops to participate in the war, so Ukraine alone cannot win.

2. The United States and the West are not monolithic, in fact, the internal contradictions are also very intense, especially the contradictions between the United States and the European Union led by France and Germany in control and counter-control are also very tense. In terms of energy, Europe mainly relies on Russia for a large part of natural gas, and Russia has a great say in this.

3. The political situation in Russia is stable and the people's lives are stable. Sanctions imposed by the United States and the West have not done much harm.

4. The battlefield is on the Ukrainian side, and the war has caused great trauma to it, and it also has a certain impact on people's lives.

So, as time goes on, the scales of war will be tilted more and more in favor of the Russian side.

I think that winning in this situation is not absolute, and losing is not absolute, it is not certain, although the Russian army has its own advantages but also has many shortcomings, lack of war experience, so it may not be able to lose, but it may not be able to win.

Battalion-level battle groups, that is, synthetic battalions, compress tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled artillery and other **. Although the composite battalion has fewer soldiers, due to the abundant firepower, the Russian army can complete more military tasks with fewer soldiers. The firepower of the Russian composite battalion has surpassed the firepower of the Stryker brigade of the US army.

If the U.S. military and the Russian army's composite battalion exchange fire, the U.S. military will most likely return with a crushing defeat.

The Russian army will definitely be able to achieve the final victory, and it will also be able to get help from other countries.

There is no winner in this war, the war has been going on for more than half a year, the people have suffered a great impact, the economy has stagnated, the people's livelihood cannot be guaranteed, Western countries have imposed sanctions on Russia, Russia's economy has been affected, and there are many soldiers. The Ukrainian leader should turn back to the shore, quickly express his position, and stop the war, otherwise he will be a sinner.

Of course, Russia will be the final winner, but during this period, Russia will also suffer a lot of losses, and it will also be the common people who will suffer, so there is really no one who is the winner.

Russia will become the final victor, although the impact of this war on Russia is still relatively serious, but Russia's military power as a whole is still very strong, and today's economic development is also in a stable state, the impact on Russia is also very positive, and the development of Ukraine has been seriously affected.

Victory belongs to Ukrainians who pursue liberal democracy.

The front is shrinking. The comparison of national strength and military strength between Russia and Ukraine is irreversible, and the Russian army still has a nuclear deterrent force that plays the hole card game under the surface of this war. The Ukrainian army does not have the ability to win at the level of "forcing Russia to surrender".

It will also need a long war to bring down Russia with the full support of the West, and the Ukrainian side will pay much more sacrifices for this than it has so far.

It depends on the actual situation, because the environment can change at any time.

If Russia wins this Russian-Ukrainian conflict, it will be bad for Ukraine in the first place, because Ukraine may no longer exist at that time; Second, it is not good for the United States and Western countries, because it means the end of US hegemony and the change of the international order system that is beneficial to Western countries. Moreover, it may not be beneficial for some countries around Russia.

One, Ukraine will cease to exist.

If Russia wins this war, its target will not only be the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, nor only the eastern region of eastern Udong in general, including Kharkiv, Kherson, and Odessa, but it is very likely that even Usi will be in the bag. In that case, the state of Ukraine would most likely not exist.

Second, the United States will lose its hegemonic status.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has evolved into a "hybrid war" between the United States and the West against Russia, and Russia's victory means a change in European geopolitics, and at the same time, it also means that the foundation of American hegemony has collapsed.

Third, it is detrimental to vested interests in the current system order.

Once Russia wins this conflict, this document signed by Putin will inevitably be implemented "above board", and these countries will inevitably be nervous.

Fifth, who won the war won the initiative.

Therefore, the United States and the Western camp will not only not easily compromise with Russia, but will weaken it at any cost. Based on this, this Russia-Ukraine conflict is unlikely to end in a short time.

If Russia wins, Putin gets the result of Ukrainian neutrality, eliminating the hidden danger of the former Soviet countries joining the Western system to jointly deal with Russia, even if Moscow's ** alliance with Washington is successful step by step after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the hegemony of the United States will be affected. Of course, the war turned Europe into a frightened bird.

The Russian-Ukrainian war, if Russia wins, the biggest winner will be Russia, which is beneficial for some countries that are often suppressed by Western countries, and it is certainly the most unfavorable for Ukraine, and Western countries and the United States are also very unfavorable, and the United States will lose its hegemonic status.

If Russia wins, it will be very beneficial to China and Russia, and it will be very disadvantageous for the United States and Ukraine, after all, the United States has been supporting Ukraine in this war.

In addition to being good for Russia, it is also good for China, good for some countries that rely on Russia, bad for the United States and Ukraine.

I think the most important thing is that it is very unfavorable for Ukraine, maybe the country of Ukraine no longer exists at that time, but it is also very unfavorable for the United States, the hegemony of the United States has ended here, and it is not good for many Eastern European countries.

The Ukrainian army has become stronger, and the Russian army has become weaker, so Russia has turned the blitzkrieg into a stalemate. The longer the Russian-Ukrainian war drags on, the more unfavorable it will be for Russia, first of all, the war will consume too much of Russia's financial resources. The second is to give Zelensky more time to speak in Western parliaments in the hope of getting more military aid, and also expect the United States and Europe to suffocate Russia and force a truce.

When Russia attacked Ukraine, it made it very clear: not to occupy Ukraine, but to "demilitarize" and "denazify" Ukraine. Russia's military strikes on Ukraine are mainly similar to surgical strikes, targeting Ukrainian military installations.

If Russia's military power is strong enough, it will naturally be able to accomplish strategic tasks in a short time. On the first day of the war, many people felt that it was difficult for Ukraine to hold out for 48 hours, mainly because of Russia's strong suppressive capabilities. Russian precision-guided missiles have destroyed a large number of military facilities in Ukraine.

Mainly because the Russian heart is too soft and the heart is too soft,

If you don't have that diamond, don't brag.

Both sides are tired, the strength is there, who is strong and who is weak, it is difficult to distinguish between the top and the bottom, the result is like a solution, just look at the next decomposition.

There is no moral bottom line, if Russia wants to demilitarize Ukraine, it has to agree, and if it doesn't agree, it will be responsible for both sides**, then when Japan invaded China, there was also the common prosperity of Greater East Asia, and if you don't agree, you have to be responsible for the war.

Because Russia has limited troops, it is difficult to hold such a large front, and Ukraine occupies a geographical advantage, so Russia will be "defeated" again and again.

It's very simple, one is that the strength of the Russian army is worse than that of the PLA, the second is that it did not do its best to fight, just to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, after all, no matter how bad the strength is, it is one of the five permanent members, and the third is that the Russian army has not done its best, it does not mean that the Ukrainian army has not done its best, just look at those crazy behaviors.

This is due to the fact that Russia was not prepared for the war, and at the same time Ukraine was supported by the capital state.

The main problem is that Russia's heart is too soft, resulting in too soft a hand.

The war between Russia and Ukraine, no matter who wins in the end, actually loses badly, and it is necessary to clean up the mess left by the war, to rebuild after the war, and to rebuild the homeland.

NATO member states will not win either, looking at the current superimposed new crown epidemic, the breaking of the ** chain caused by the war, the skyrocketing prices, the food crisis, the energy crisis, etc., it is enough to make them anxious. The result of their support for Ukraine is to shoot themselves in the foot, and they are self-inflicted. The consequences of the self-righteous "wise decisions" of politicians are ultimately paid for by the people.

No one likes war, just as no one likes the plague, but for a certain country that has always been good at making war money, war can make their ** large sales profiteering on the one hand, and on the other hand, it can also weaken the national strength of the competitor country to maintain its hegemony.

For the sake of their own supreme interests, they have taken the lead in using nuclear ** and biochemical **, and the **** they keep saying they want to eliminate is only a drop in the bucket compared to this, and they are the largest terrorist organization in the world.

The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria have caused trauma and damage to these countries that are still difficult to erase.

Those who do many injustices will be killed, and if they are big enough to be small in the country, they will be punished for their many evils. If it goes against the interests of all mankind, you will not end well.