What are the characteristics of the argument

The arguments are factual arguments and moral arguments. Factual arguments include examples, historical facts, and data. Taoist arguments include doctrines, aphorisms, famous sayings, sayings, and axioms.

The role of factual arguments: used at the beginning to elicit the central argument; Serve as an argument for the argument in the text to enhance persuasiveness; Add interest to your article and engage your readers. It is used in the middle to prove the sub-argument of this paragraph.

The role of Taoist arguments is to quote famous quotes to make Taoist arguments, enhance the persuasiveness of the article, and better prove the author's point of view.

The principle of selecting factual arguments

1. Pay attention to the typicality of the argument.

Factual arguments include various examples, historical facts, and statistical data, and only typical and representative arguments can be convincing. Don't generalize and ignore one or the other. Only choose the trivial things around you as arguments, such as when discussing the idea that "the one who is close to ink is black", use "My neighbor and friend are in prison......Such examples are often unbelievable, unconvincing, and not very argumentative.

2. Pay attention to the accuracy of the argument.

In order to make people believe in the factual arguments, the material must be accurate and true, and it is imperative not to make up any nonsense. Because the memory of the material is not accurate, many people are too lazy to verify it, so they rely on memory to compose, and as a result, Einstein's invention of the electric light is placed on Einstein, and the medal that Marie Curie indifferently gave to her children for fame and fortune to play with is said to be a gold watch.

Example:

1.Liu. Chapter 3 of the Law can be argued that strict discipline, trustworthiness and peace of mind can achieve great causes.

2.Xiao He chases Han Xin can argue that he cherishes strange talents and dares to reuse unknown people.

Wait. 3.Jing Ke's assassination of the King of Qin can be argued that killing oneself to become a benevolent, sacrificing one's life for righteousness, taking risks and making it difficult to repay one's confidant, etc.

4.Yang Shili Xue Chengmen can demonstrate the humility and sincerity of seeking teachers, the spirit of perseverance and sincerity, etc.

5.Liang Hongyu's anti-Jin soldiers can demonstrate women's patriotic spirit, tenacious fighting spirit, etc.

6.Wen Tianxiang.

The song of righteousness can be used to demonstrate patriotism, benevolence, and the fearless spirit of treating death as home.

7.Huang Daopo's improvement of textile technology can be demonstrated for the selfless dedication of the people who spread the technology and became rich in the village.

8.Wang Mian's study of painting can be argued for diligent study, perseverance, and ultimate success.

Argument skills. Technique guide: The passage revolves around the theme of "forgetfulness" and chooses "Edison.

Newton. "Bai Juyi.

The three examples illustrate the meaning and scope of "forgetting", and the view that "forgetting oneself is to reach the realm of self-forgetfulness" is typical, accurate, and very convincing. The use case starts with a question and then the use case is analyzed, which is a way of argumentation.

Using two identical examples, combined and analyzed, is a way of argumentation. What if I have more than two characters on hand? It must not be a simple accumulation of materials, but several arguments can be combined in a comparative way, complementing each other, and forming a group effect.

Argument: It is the material that supports the argument, the reason and basis used by the writer to prove the argument.

1.Facts and arguments: Facts play a very obvious role in arguments, analyze facts, see the truth, and test whether it is logically consistent with the points of the article. (Representative examples, conclusive data, reliable historical facts, etc.)

2.Taoist arguments: The truths used as arguments are always familiar to the reader, or are generally recognized by the society, and they are the result of abstracting and generalizing a large number of facts.

<> arguments can be divided into two categories: factual arguments and Taoist arguments. Its characteristics are: factual arguments, which are true descriptions and generalizations of objective things, have the character of direct reality, and are therefore the most convincing arguments to prove an argument.

Factual arguments include specific examples, generalized facts, statistics, personal experience, etc. Theoretical arguments refer to those viewpoints that are the most correct in practice and have been proven and tested by long-term practice. It includes classical writings and authoritative statements, as well as principles, laws, formulas, etc., of the natural sciences.

Arguments: It is the classification of arguments according to arguments.

1.Factual arguments. It can be a specific case, a general fact, a statistic, or a figure from a specific case file. For example, Ouyang Xiu's "Preface to the Biography of the Five Dynasties of Shi Lingguan" is based on specific historical facts.

2.Theoretical arguments. It can be the wise sayings of the sages and ancients, incisive judgments, or philosophical principles or scientific axioms, laws, etc. For example, at the end of Liang Qichao's "On Perseverance", theoretical materials are used as arguments.

The supposedly interpreted argument is something that can be used as proof.

According to jū (1) —拮淚機" ( jiéjū): Financially strained, lack of money.

2) See also jù; qie

Basic word meaning. Occupy.

According to jù move

1) (Shape sound. Original meaning: hand resting; Leaning).

2) Same meaning.

According to it, the rod is also held. - Sayings

Feng Ji Ji staff. - Warring States Policy: Yan Ce".

Shi bowed his head. - Zhuangzi Thief

3) Rely on, rely on.

No, you can't. - Poetry, Wind and Boat

God will take possession of me. - The Five Years of the Duke of Zuo

Honestly, according to the situation. - Historical Records: The Biography of Jun Yuqing of the Plains

The north is based on Han Chu. - Romance of the Three Kingdoms: The Biography of Zhuge Liang

Backward stronghold. ——Xu Xiake's Travels, Travels to Huangshan

4) Again: by (by); according to the sycamore (leaning on the sycamore tree); argue (argue on reason); According to the (by the hand); According to the high condescending (by virtue of the high to control the low); Evidence (dependence).

5) According to.

According to Yude. —The Analects

Those who rule according to the law will be in peace with the people. -- Shang Junshu - Change of Law".

6) Another example: according to the scriptures (according to the scriptures); according to chaos (according to the history of troubled times); According to common sense (according to common sense); According to (basis); According to the ancient (respect for the ancient road).

7) Possession, occupy

It is according to Chen. - Historical Records: Chen Shijia".

According to its grid. ——Zizhi Tongjian: Tang Ji".

According to it. -- General Knowledge of Information Governance

It's all against the odds. -- Guangdong Military Affairs

The meaning of argument is logic, which refers to the judgment that is used to prove an argument.

It is one of the three elements of the proposal, and it is the basis of the theory.

Introduction:

Discussion, also known as the Rational and Cultural Hall, is a style of writing that analyzes affairs, discusses affairs, expresses opinions, and puts forward propositions. The author determines whether a certain point of view is correct or wrong, and establishes or denies a certain proposition by presenting facts, reasoning, distinguishing between right and wrong, and giving examples. It has the characteristics of clear views, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments, and strict logic.

It is different from the narrative essay that indirectly expresses the author's thoughts and feelings with a vivid narrative, and it is also different from the expository essay that focuses on introducing or explaining the shape, nature, cause, and function of things. All in all, the discussion is an article that convinces people with reason, and the narrative and expository essays are articles that move people with facts and teach people with knowledge.

Because the discussion is to reward the good and punish the evil, to persuade and guide people, and to guide people to be cautious, it must be convincing and have a correct value orientation.

When taking political classes seriously, we should often read rational articles, famous sayings, and aphorisms, which will improve our ideological quality and enhance our ability to understand. Especially for our writing, it is very good for the writing of the discussion. It will play a role in enriching the content of the article, deepening the idea of the article, and improving the persuasiveness of the article.

To put it simply, it's what it is.

Ask what the arguments for positive law are.

1. The connotation and interrelationship between the reality of law (what the law actually is, that is, the enactment of law) and the ought of law (what law should be, that is, "the essence of the law of things") and their interrelationship, and the relationship between law and morality, are both related and different. Any law contains a certain code of ethics. The law stipulates what people should do, what they can do, and what they are forbidden to do, which often reflects the moral value orientation of the legislator, that is, the ethical concepts of justice and injustice, good and evil, justice and favoritism, honor and shame, and so on.

At the same time, there are also differences between law and morality in terms of their formation, manifestation, adjustment objects, adjustment scope, adjustment mechanism, and so on. Therefore, the interrelationship between law and morality is one issue, and the ought and reality of law is another. The latter asks for answers to what law should be (including but not limited to morality) and what law actually is (including morality but not limited to morality).

There are cases among both Western and Chinese scholars who confuse these two issues, and their views are obviously incorrect.

2. As mentioned above, the connotation and extension of the concept of "what the law should be" are very rich and broad. If it is said that the three mainstream schools of law in the West, namely, the natural law school, the social law school, and the analytical and positive law school, each focus their research is respectively on the moral basis of law, the content of law (benefits and their distribution and realization, etc.), and the form of law (their concepts, characteristics, structure, etc.), then the conclusions they draw that have scientific value and conform to objective reality, or some reasonable factors and components contained in the conclusions, are all contents and manifestations that belong to or partially belong to the category of "what law should be". Therefore, the view that the moral basis of law belongs to the category of "the law should be" and the form of law belongs to the category of "the reality of law", or that the view that "what law should be" and "what law actually is" are completely separate or absolutely opposed, is also incorrect.

Argument is one of the three elements of the argument.

An argument is in the service of proving an argument, and analyzing an argument can see what it proves, affirms, and supports, and that's the argument.

Argument test points: Arguments are the basis on which the argument is based, and are generally all factual arguments and Taoist arguments.

1. Use facts as arguments. The case must be true, credible, exemplary, reveal the essence of the matter and have a certain logical connection with the argument. In the discussion, the description of the examples given should be concise and to the point, highlighting the parts that are directly related to the argument.

When clarifying an argument, it is important not only to know where the factual argument is used in the text, but also to summarize the factual argument. In order to be accurate, it is necessary to grasp the essential characteristics of the argument according to the argument and then express it in precise language.

2. The remarks used as arguments should have a certain degree of authority, and when directly quoting, they should be reproduced in the original text, checked with truth, and cannot be taken out of context; The original meaning cannot be misinterpreted when quoted indirectly.

Do you know what the arguments are?

The argument must be well-founded, that is, sufficient facts or correct reasoning must be cited to prove the correctness of the argument. The facts and reasoning used to prove an argument are called arguments.

Arguments, according to their nature and characteristics, can be divided into two categories: factual arguments and Taoist arguments (also known as matter arguments).

Arguments are all about arguing and supporting your arguments.