The quotient of two numbers is 8, and if the dividend is constant, multiply the divisor by 4 and the

This statement is false.

Method 1. The formula expression for division is: Dividend divisor = quotient, since the quotient of two numbers is 8, it can be obtained: dividend divisor = 8.

If the dividend is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 4, the formula expression for division becomes: Dividend (4 divisor) = Dividend Divisor 4=8 4=2. The quotient should become 2, not 32.

Method two. According to the conversion of multiplication and division, multiplying the divisor by 4 is equivalent to being multiplied by 1 4 and then divided by the divisor, or according to the commutative law of multiplication, the original formula is equal to the dividend divided by the divisor and multiplied by 1 4, which is equivalent to the quotient multiplied by 1 4, and the final result is 2.

1. The divisor is the division rule of a single number.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at one by one.

One is not enough to see two, except which businessman which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

2. The divisor is a two-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor is two to see two digits.

Two is not enough to see three, except which businessman.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

3. Multi-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at a few bits.

This is not enough to look at the next position, except which businessman to which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

4. The nature of the quotient is invariant.

The divisor and the divisor are multiplied at the same time, and the multiplication factor should be the same.

The dividend, the divisor are the same as the divisor, and the number divided is the same.

Multiplication and division are all excluded from 0, and the invariant nature of the quotient should be remembered.

Wrong. Dividend.

The same is the same, the divisor is multiplied by 4, and the quotient is divided by 4 instead, so the current quotient is 8 4 = 2

This statement is false.

The formula expression of method 1 division is: dividend divisor = quotient, since the quotient of two numbers is 8, it can be obtained: dividend divisor = 8.

If the dividend is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 4, the formula expression for division becomes: Dividend (4 divisor) = Dividend Divisor 4=8 4=2. The quotient should become 2, not 32.

Method 2 According to the mutual conversion of multiplication and division, the divisor is multiplied by 4, which is equivalent to being multiplied by 1 4 and then divided by the divisor, or according to the commutative law of multiplication, the original formula is equal to the dividend divided by the divisor and then multiplied by 1 4, which is equivalent to the quotient multiplied by 1 4, and the final result is 2.

1. The divisor is the division rule of a single number.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at one by one.

One is not enough to see two, except which businessman which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

2. The divisor is a two-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor is two to see two digits.

Two is not enough to see three, except which businessman.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

3. Multi-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at a few bits.

This is not enough to look at the next position, except which businessman to which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

4. The nature of the quotient is invariant.

The divisor and the divisor are multiplied at the same time, and the multiplication factor should be the same.

The dividend, the divisor are the same as the divisor, and the number divided is the same.

Multiplication and division are all excluded from 0, and the invariant nature of the quotient should be remembered.

The quotient of two numbers is 8, and if the divisor is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 4, the quotient becomes 32, which is false.

Multiply the divisor by 4, and the quotient is reduced to 1/4 of the original, and the quotient becomes 2

To answer this question you asked, our system has assigned you the most professional answer, and in the next 5 minutes, he will answer your questions accordingly, because the current number of consultations is large, please wait patiently. You can review your question, complete the information, or add a description of your question.

If there is no trouble, kiss and take the time to give the teacher a thumbs up, your support is the biggest motivation for me. Pay attention to the teacher, next time you have a problem, come directly to the teacher, I wish you all the best, and all your wishes come true

No. Dividend Divisor = quotient, when the divisor is multiplied by 4, the dividend (divisor * 4) = quotient 4

So if the quotient is 8, then 8 4=2

This statement is false.

Method 1. The formula expression for division is: Dividend divisor = quotient, since the quotient of two numbers is 8, it can be obtained: dividend divisor = 8.

If the dividend is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 4, the formula expression for division becomes: Dividend (4 divisor) = Dividend Divisor 4=8 4=2. The quotient should become 2, not 32.

Method two. According to the conversion of multiplication and division, multiplying the divisor by 4 is equivalent to being multiplied by 1 4 and then divided by the divisor, or according to the commutative law of multiplication, the original formula is equal to the dividend divided by the divisor and multiplied by 1 4, which is equivalent to the quotient multiplied by 1 4, and the final result is 2.

1. The divisor is the division rule of a single number.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at one by one.

One is not enough to see two, except which businessman which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

2. The divisor is a two-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor is two to see two digits.

Two is not enough to see three, except which businessman.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

3. Multi-digit division rule.

Integer division from the high position. The divisor looks at a few bits.

This is not enough to look at the next position, except which businessman to which one.

The remainder is smaller than the divisor and is not enough to quotient a zero placeholder.

4. The nature of the quotient is invariant.

The divisor and the divisor are multiplied at the same time, and the multiplication factor should be the same.

The dividend, the divisor are the same as the divisor, and the number divided is the same.

Multiplication and division are all excluded from 0, and the invariant nature of the quotient should be remembered.

Mistake. Example; 32 4=8,32 (8*4)=1, change the divisor according to the question conditions.

Later, the new quotient was 1.

The quotient of two numbers is 8, and if the dividend is constant, multiply the divisor by 4 and the quotient becomes 32. Paizhi's statement is wrong.

The process is as follows:

The formula for division is as follows: Dividend Divisor = quotient, since the quotient of two numbers is 8, it can be obtained: Dividend Divisor = 8.

If the dividend is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 4, the formula expression for division becomes: Dividend (4 divisor) = Dividend Divisor 4=8 4=2. The quotient should become 2, not 32.

1. Dividend divisor = quotient.

2. Quotient = divisor.

3. Divisor quotient = dividend.

4. Divisor = (Dividend - Remainder) quotient.

5. Quotient = (dividend - remainder) divisor.

Operational properties of division:

1. The dividend expands (shrinks) n times, and the divisor remains unchanged, and the quotient also expands (shrinks) n times accordingly. Debate shirts.

2. The divisor expands (shrinks) n times, the dividend remains unchanged, and the quotient shrinks (expands) n times accordingly.

The Law of Division:

1. Divide from the high position of the dividend, how many digits there are in the divisor, just look at the first few digits of the dividend, if it is not enough to divide, look at one more person.

2. Divide to which digit of the dividend, write the quotient on which digit, if it is not enough to divide, on this digit quotient 0.

3. The remainder obtained by each division must be smaller than the divisor, and the number of the dividend-being on this digit is dropped on the right side of the remainder, and then continue to divide.

According to the law of change of the quotient, the quotient of two numbers is 8, if the dividend is constant, the divisor is multiplied by 2, and the quotient is 8 2=4

So the answer is: 4

Divisor Divisor = 32 (Dividend 4) Divisor = 32 4 = 8 The quotient is 8

The quotient of two numbers is 27, and if the divisor is unchanged and the divisor is multiplied by 9, then the quotient becomes 3.

Because the quotient is multiplied by the divisor, it is equal to the dividend.

If the divisor is unchanged, multiply the divisor by nine, then the quotient will be divided by nine!

The mountain must have shrunk nine times to three.

Because the dividend is equal to the divisor multiplied by the quotient.

If the dividend does not change, it is equivalent to the product of two numbers does not change, and when one number becomes larger, the other number will become smaller.

The quotient of two numbers is 20, and if the dividend is constant, multiply the divisor by 4 and the quotient becomes 5