Comment on who is right and who is wrong, everyone will comment on which country s policy this is

Personally, I think B is wrong. You're a girl, aren't you? I don't think this kind of thing happens to boys, very rarely; For example, I am very good friends with me, the good ones are not good, we often have conflicts, but the two of us have discussed this issue, the other party's lover can only care, but must not be entangled after the woman makes a decision, or I like a person who knows about it, this is the most basic respect for people and themselves, and it is also the key to the longevity of friendship, in addition to their friendship is not strong.

It is said that love is great. But this plot is clearly not like that. So I don't think it's right.

She even asked you who you were facing.

If you try to match again, it's basically hopeless, the two of them don't work hard, the third party doesn't work hard, you are at most the role of boosting, and it is impossible for the two of them to have a good development direction, and it is useless for you to boost.

As for who to hold, there are 3 suggestions: first, go directly to A, obviously B is not right, and what do you say "stop pestering him, don't say that I hurt you, it's you who hurt yourself", I don't even understand fair competition, and I am hypocritical, hypocrisy is to protect myself and not to harm others. If there is love in the sky, the sky is also old, and the right way in the world is the vicissitudes of life

Second, there is no derogatory element in it, and the two-sided thing here says that they are all your friends, and their contradictions do not need to evolve into your contradictions, right? Therefore, until the matter between them is clear, don't show who you are inclined to too deeply, which is conducive to maintaining the friendship between you and their two brothers

.I forgot about the third suggestion. If I'm not mistaken, the third option I think is probably the best solution.

It should be all children, or very naïve, and when you grow up and look back on this history, you will feel that it is not a big deal at all, even if it collapses now, you will still be friends in the future. Maintain a neutral stance, and don't say break with anyone. Otherwise, you will feel childish when you grow up.

Both of your friends are doing childish things and can't say who's right and who's wrong.

There is no way to qualitatively and quantitatively feel about emotional things.

I'll tell you a way to choose.

First of all, you don't think about who is right and who is wrong, it doesn't matter, now, it's who you want to choose as your friend, this question is clear first!

Then, I'll tell you a way to choose one of the 2 choices!

First of all, you should think about what you want to be your friend, or what are the criteria for choosing your friends.

Such as: personality, academic performance, relationship with your family, help you now, help you in the future, etc.

Then, you divide A and B.

If you feel that A's character is good, give him 3 points, and B's generally score 1 point, and in the end, after you make the points, whoever has the highest will choose whomever hehe.

Can the two reconcile! It's up to you to be a friend. There's no right or wrong thing about this.

My opinion may be very simple, but this is my idea, from the situation described by you, from my point of view, I don't like B this kind of girl very much, her approach is very annoying, first of all, B she doesn't count, and then she also hurts her friends, if you and both of you are good friends, you don't need to be special to be good with one party, snub the other party, after all, this thing is not because of you, you just feel a little embarrassed yourself, no need, follow your own feelings, That's all I can say.

Who can be emotionally at fault? And who's right?

Two people have rights in the face of a man, even if two people are friends, good friends. But who can choose to give up in the face of their own happiness?

I'm telling you, you said you were towards the man. Such a thing is not to make you a good person. You can only fulfill the most promising. [If you follow what you say].

There is no right or wrong in ethics.

Is it interesting to fight like this for something that doesn't know the outcome? If you really cherish them, you don't want to be inclined to anyone, and it is right for you to respect everyone's choice as a bystander, that is, that senior!

Anyone will know what is going on in the face of the results. It is also possible that no one got that senior in the end.

This may be the price of growth, there are no absolutes, and it is not right for you to think that they cannot reconcile, because your thoughts directly determine your subconscious practices. It is very likely that they will be reconciled after this incident, although it is difficult to say that way. But as their friend, you should do your best to comfort them.

Who can not be selfish in the face of their own happiness? After such a thing, they will understand a lot of truth.

Hope you are happy, and your friends!

It's not worth it for this kind of thing, think about it, there is no grass at the end of the world, why bother to love a flower, oh, it's not a grass. Think about the friendship you used to have, did you really give up for this relationship that shouldn't have been? In the end, the person who is laughing is the senior I think is the senior, he will think:

Look at how charismatic I am, I can make two good friends turn their faces.

Play stupid and change the subject.

In fact, there are some things that can be understood psychologically.

If they behave widely, they will know how naïve they were in the first place.

Who is good with whom, and what can be done?

When you open up, you will know that people only have a few true friends.

Just a few of them may meet and be strangers in the future.

I'm going to find the two of them out with such a complicated situation, and it's not simple.

If you want neither to hurt, you can only say that A is right in front of A, and B is right in front of B, and you don't say anything when you are there. Ha, don't think it's the golden mean, this is a clever plan used by Zhiduoxing Wu!

Personally, I think the second picture looks better in black.

Give it, the right to be born and raised! What is the relationship after marriage, after all, it is two families! Only now, you're still their daughter! After all, the grace of birth and nurturing is greater than heaven!

It should be given, after all, she raised you to use

Your mom is a little selfish. But no matter how wrong she is, after all, she is the mother who gave birth to you and raised you. Bear with her. I know you're also very uncomfortable and aggrieved, but after all, she raised you. There is no merit and hard work.

Family affection is not more important than money, and besides, your mother will have to prepare a dowry for you in the future! Give it or not, let it be up to you!

Give it and repay it....I'm talking about it later.

I don't know if I refuse.

In a word, you can't live like this, there are two hidden dangers in living like this:

One is that if you live for a long time, it will inevitably produce gossip, and people will be terrible.

The second is that men and women are alone, live for a long time, it is possible to have feelings, and they will have feelings for a long time, so this possibility must be strangled in the cradle, the best way is to ask him to leave, staying in a hotel is by no means a long-term solution, but you can also tell the man in this way, let him know how to leave.

It is not possible to live, and the locks must be changed. But forget the previous ones, to be honest, if you want to, it's not safe to be thousands of miles away, I really don't want to have anything, and sleeping in a bed won't happen.

This woman has a big problem, the best solution The man goes out to live in a hotel, he shouldn't live with a woman, he doesn't do much, the woman understands your husband more, a man can't stand this!

Hey, why is that person like this, he looks inconvenient and bothers others.

Originally, it was so difficult for us to stand at the first level of teachers, and the 2009 290 document made us breathe a sigh of relief, which made me angry again, and quickly took it back View the original post

I'd rather tear down ten temples than tear down one bridge, which probably means that even if she does a lot of immoral things, she doesn't want to ruin the happiness of others! She means she doesn't want to break you up!

The examples given are not representative, since the article wants to emphasize the view that human subjective initiative overcomes difficulties, but you choose to use some celebrities in the academic world, the academic world is not a place to talk about hard work but about the mind, and it is not a manual labor such as a wage earner, what is the use of brute force?

So your example is incorrect, people who aspire to pursue a career in academia will mobilize their own subjective initiative, overcome difficulties, and study hard, and only a small number of them succeed, and the success of academia can only be attributed to wisdom and probability, not morality.

Of course, you must not think that your teacher allows you to write like this now, and you can continue to pretend to be stupid, after all, your ultimate goal is the college entrance examination, and the teachers of the college entrance examination may not eat this set, but they will definitely use things that make sense.

The biggest drawback of this article is that it is untitled.