A tool to find a scanned version of an ancient book to convert to text

With Office's Document Imaging OCR text recognition function, it can recognize text from scanned documents and convert them into text or Word format files;

Open the software from Start - Program - Office.

First open the scanned tag file in the image file format, click on the tool - 'Recognize text with OCR' to recognize it, and then save it as a text file.

You need to install a text recognition system. To give you a few connections to try, the general text recognition system needs to be matched with the scanner. You try it. No, look for it again.

Skysoft has this type of conversion software.

According to your tone, it shouldn't be doing research. First of all, what you must need is a part of the "New Edition of Zhuzi Integration" (or "Twenty-two Sons" and "Zhuzi Integration", I only know that there is a scanned version, which is very ugly. And as a research, it still needs to be convenient to have a paper copy.

Of course, if there is one that can enter the software, you can also use it.

The text and ideas of Mozi are relatively simple, but the text is not complete, that is, it is incomplete in the process of circulation.

Mencius is relatively profound, more direct, because the Song Dynasty entered the Confucian classics, so there is a lot of research, sweat and cow. In recent years, the main breakthrough has been the excavation of a large number of silk slips.

Zhuangzi seems simple, but the realm is ethereal, and it is not just the surface meaning that needs to be understood. Therefore, it was praised by later generations of metaphysicians. Later, it became a "Taoist" classic. Of course, research and misinterpretation are more intense.

In addition, "Lao Tzu", one of the sources of traditional Chinese texts, especially the direct excavation of simple silk texts, the research should be very precise, and it is very easy to get started.

The study of Zhuzi is, first of all, the proofreading of the text, that is, the deviation of the text itself that you see cannot be too far. Second, to understand the original meaning of the text, remember that the people of the neighborhood often apply the grammar of "science" and the precise philosophy and universal theories to completely Westernize the original meaning of Zhuzi.

In addition to the texts, there must be "Erya" and "Erya Forest", "Dialects" and "Yang Xiong Dialect Proofreading Proof", "Shuowen Interpretation of Words" and "Shuowen Interpretation of Words", "All Classics and Meanings", and "Classic Interpretations".

Get a city library card to borrow books, and sometimes there are typos in the online version. The proofreading of the book is stricter and safer.

Go to Jingdong to buy a copy of Zhuzi Baijia.

Leave an email and I'll pass you on what I have.

Go and see the hundred pulpits, there are all of them.

Put it in PS, use the magic wand tool to select the blank area, it will all be selected to the yellow background, and then press Ctrl+Delete to fill in the white color, and press Ctrl+D to cancel the selection after filling; Then use the magic wand tool to select any text, it will select all the text, and then press alt+delete to fill in the black, and press the key mentioned above to cancel the selection after filling, and it's done.

Provide an idea to try if you can. Scanning with a virtual scanner, I remember that Office had a similar component. This kind of work has never been done.

Preferably in traditional Chinese. Because Chinese writing is mainly hieroglyphics, the word has multiple meanings, and the meaning of its words or words is established and unique in different contexts, especially the ancient and medieval texts, so the knowledge and methods of exegesis are very important. Simplified Chinese is somewhat similar to one of many translations.

I'm not against a simplified version, but it's better to have a traditional or original version; There is no objection to simplifying words, but it is better to be able to read the traditional and use the simplified.

Wrong! Not the comma in front, but the question mark in the back! This is a declarative sentence! The recommended answer is the goods that have been brushed up, and the other one has gone in the wrong direction.

I think it's wrong. The part that precedes the first comma is already a complete sentence, while the part that follows it has no conjunctions with the preceding part. A full stop should be used here.

False, the last question mark should be a full stop.

At the end of the sentence is the full stop, the solid is the focus, and the hollow is the outline.

In professional terms, a word "off" can express this phenomenon, and the missing text is called off-text. In addition, in the process of copying the literature, one or several words are omitted. Also called"Grab"、"Que Wen"