How does the military strength of India and China compare

At present, I have seen a lot of articles on the Internet, and the core theme of the content of the article is that China's armed forces are weaker than India's, some say that China is 10 years behind India, and some say that it is 20 years behind.

Comparison of the armed forces of the country:

First of all, the Air Force's domestic J-11 and J-10 have been put into production, which means that we can produce first-class equipment on a large scale in the country, and the supply and maintenance of the same parts are very convenient.

And India's Su-30 relies heavily on foreign parts for supply, and because it has no technical maintenance capability in wartime, it was shot down by the MiG-21 in the recent India-Pakistan conflict, and it can't take off and attack on a large scale, the supply of logistics is very problematic, and it has no ability to manufacture, and India's latest LCA fighter development plan is about to be aborted, and China's J-10 has long flown into the sky, I don't know what India's air force relies on to compete with us, The same Su-27 is made in China, but the ** made by China is less than 1 2 of the ** purchased by India, and the maintenance and supply of parts are all localized. In this way, it seems that the Air Force, we should not bully others.

The Army's Chinese Type 98 is in service, and its combat performance is similar to that of the American M1A1, while the Indian Arjun tank of the same period has been aborted and has many problems that cannot be solved. It is possible to buy tanks only from Russia, it is not known the military strength and technology of the two countries, who is stronger?

At present, China has completed the launching of a number of warships of the Chinese Aegis. In this way, in addition to Russia and the United States, China becomes the third country to have Aegis-like technology, and even Japan needs to buy from the United States. China's latest 409 nuclear submarine has been launched, and this submarine is on a par with the existing submarines of the United States, Russia and Western countries, and has strong attack capabilities.

And what about India? Conventional submarines haven't figured it out yet, have they?

The comparison of land, sea, and air equipment and related materials is over, so let's look at the economic situation, our current economic situation is much better than India's economic situation, I don't know how India's so-called China is 20 years behind India came up with it, and then the comparison of ballistic missiles, at present, China's ballistic missile technology is not only fully equipped but also advanced and accurate, and then look at India's missiles are not only small in number but also backward in equipment, and there is no significance compared with our country, which are fundamentally two different things, and then look at the quality of military personnel. In the battle between China and India, only 2 Chinese regiments managed to defeat a reinforced Indian brigade. In the case of backward equipment, since India is defeated on the premise of a small number of people, can we still make any strong excuse for India's military capabilities? Is India really stronger than our country?

Not as good as China. 1. India's basic industry is far inferior to China's, so its military industry level cannot reach China's level.

2. India's military equipment is mainly dependent on imports, while China's military equipment is mainly domestic.

3. India's army is not as large as China's, and its army is not comparable to China in terms of quantity or quality.

4. The level of strategic India is very poor, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles, strategic nuclear submarines, etc., India is blank.

Overall, India's comprehensive national strength is far inferior to China's.

In fact, in some respects, China is indeed inferior to India.

1.India would rather spend ** to buy products from the United States, and Russia is a bit outdated.

China would rather spend this money on independent research and development.

2.Excluding the military, because there is nothing to say, the upstairs is basically the same. Let's just say that the quality of the army is put.

Sichuan's leading role is the People's Liberation Army, and it does not hesitate to save people's property. And India came to wonder that **** actually beat the commander to death.

3.I've had a thin skin and I've compared it to India.

After so many years in Pakistan, people will do this with you, and you can't accept it. In this regard, China is at least one China in the world.

In terms of equipment, the Indian army's equipment has a low degree of localization, and it relies on imports to a large extent, which leads to the fact that there are many types, which is not conducive to the maintenance and maintenance of equipment, while China's equipment has a high degree of localization, which is conducive to maintenance and maintenance, and most of them have been equipped for many years, and have formed strong combat effectiveness, for example, the Indian army has purchased Su-27 and Su-30 fighters from Russia, and these two types of equipment have been settled in China for many years, and can be approved for domestic production, Combat effectiveness has long been formed.

If there is a local war, India has a logistical advantage, and if it is a full-scale war, it is difficult to say! Judging from the history of ancient wars, China still takes the lead!

India is not our opponent at all.

China's army, navy and air force are all able to produce their own equipment.

India can only import imitations.

The four countries with the strongest military power in the eyes of the Americans, India is the fourth? China's ranking was too unexpected.

China's military strength is strong!

Pla.

According to reports, in an Indian polling agency entitled "How do you think India's military capabilities compare to China?".In the survey, 72 percent of Indians are confident that India can win the confrontation with our countryNine percent of Indians responded that "we can't win against China."

China's military is much, much stronger than India's.

Total strength of the Chinese Army: 1.5 million. Tanks: 8000 units. 1000 main battle tanks. Large-caliber artillery: more than 10,000 pieces.

The total strength of the Indian Army is about 420,000. Tanks: Main battle tanks: 3414 units. Infantry fighting vehicles: 350 units for Type 1, 1,000 units for Type 2.

China's air force is one of the largest in the world, and most of its equipment is relatively old. However, compared with India, the equipment is not bad, and the number is twice that of India. The combat power is much higher than that of India.

The Chinese navy is also very large, with nuclear submarines, intercontinental nuclear strike capabilities, and its combat power is higher than that of India. The only thing India has more than China is that it has two light aircraft carriers, which are not very powerful.

Putting it aside, this is a changing number. Both countries are developing faster.

2.The army India has 900,000 troops, and it has a tactical advantage in terms of strength and number in the areas disputed with our country.

3.The Navy can dominate the Indian Ocean, except for the United States. It has advanced maritime ** such as aircraft carriers.

4.Air Force fighters absorb the excellence of many countries**. The number is also relatively large.

The disadvantage is that India's geographical location is below our country, at the top of the list, and it does not need a very expensive ** to hit its populated areas, and India, on the contrary, needs medium-range missiles. India's infrastructure is poor, and the mobilization of military forces is slow to respond.

**The conversion rate is not as good as that of my country, it is a multi-country **warehouse, and the logistics and maintenance are very troublesome.

Because India is in an excellent position like India, it can curb China's oil imports from the Middle East.

All in all, the two countries have their own advantages, and our country's advantage is greater than that of India, after all, as early as the 50s of the last century, the winners and losers have been distinguished, and the advantages in their hearts are obvious. Secondly, India is not our main strategic opponent, and it can be suppressed as long as it maintains normalcy.

Don't give me the most satisfying answer.

Equipment is a face, and man's will to fight is;On the other hand, there are many military ** and forums for the answers you want, but you ignore one main question, dare not fight, since the last Sino-Indian self-defense counterattack, India has been holding back a momentum, where are we?

Although the fat cow is big, it is no match for the thin wolf, so the key point is to distinguish who is the fat cow and who is the wolf.

The United States released the 2020 world military power rankings, and India ranked fourth after China, what is going on?

In a full-scale war, only the United States imperialism has the ability to start a war with China, and Russia can't do it, and now it's money to fight a war, although Russia has no money, it has technology, and India has a yarn?

China's military strength is strong!

Pla.