After the end of World War II, which is stronger, China or India

Economically, India was stronger than China in the early days, and it was not until the founding of the People's Republic of China that China's economic strength gradually surpassed India.

Militarily, India has always been less powerful than China.

Militarily, China was strong, and the Kuomintang Gui army was the strongest in Asia at that time.

Militarily, there is no need to analyze it at all, and there is a Sino-Indian conflict that can be directly referenced. Economically, the backbone of India's economy is the software industry, and there was no electronic software industry just after the end of World War II.

They've all said it, and I'm not going to say it.

The hardware gap is that India has a relatively advanced navy and initially has the requirements of a blue ocean fleet. The Navy is equipped with aircraft carriers, carrier-based AWACS aircraft, and a range of system of air superiority fighters. There is a relatively complete naval system.

The Air Force has introduced a lot of Eastern and Western style fighters, such as the F15 series imported from the USA, the launch technology imported from the Western world, and the Su30MKI series imported from Russia, and the overall system of the Air Force is also OK. Most of them are finished products bought with money, and China is almost entirely independent in the field of science and technology. Commonly known as "cottage".

But the biggest gap, as Feng Zibei said, lies in the quality of soldiers. It is true that the will of Indian soldiers is inferior to that of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. During its service, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) has conducted comprehensive ideological and political education, dared to fight and sacrifice, and had a strong military level.

And the most important thing is that China has the aura of the Communist Party, almost all of them are the kind of situation where they are resurrected in a state of fullness, and I don't believe that we can see the self-defense war against Vietnam, the self-defense war against India, the border dispute with Russia, and the South China Sea dispute with Vietnam.

Also, China's nuclear ** is decades ahead of India! China has a complete equipment manufacturing system, as well as a combat readiness system. India doesn't, and the time for their combat mobilization can allow Chinese soldiers to go home and watch the Spring Festival Gala!

I don't look at the right time, place, and people, but just want to understand the military gap between the two.

1;Navy China has Chinese Aegis ships, strategic nuclear submarines, conventional submarines, regardless of quantity and quality, overwhelming the other side, but the advantage is not absolute.

Although their country's navy is not strong, China is also average, they have three aircraft carriers, and the submarines are good, but they are rented, and China's aircraft carriers will only have combat effectiveness in the next 10 years.

2；The army is not better than ah, in the world, the Chinese army said the second, no one dares to be the first, the Type 99 tank can sweep across Asia, second only to the United States M1A2 in actual combat, second to the German Leopard II data, should be one of the best! Other equipment is also superior to India, and it is a defensive country, so the army is naturally not bad.

3;China has complete superiority in the Air Force, J10-Su-27 should be the main combat aircraft, J8 is a standing aircraft, numerical superiority! I won't say anything about India's domestic production, I can't take it out, there are Su-27, Su-30, Su-35, the number is insufficient, and if there is a war, the domestic production line is not on the top, and it is okay to cut off import routes or block China on the coast.

In the counterattack against India in 62, the light ** of our army is the Type 56 gun family - Type 56 semi-automatic rifle, Type 56 submachine gun, Type 56 light machine gun. The 40 Fire Indian Army was equipped with the old Enfield bolt machine rifle, Stern submachine gun, and Bren light machine gun that were eliminated by the British army after World War II.

It can be said that there is a whole generation difference.

Today, we can manufacture high-end aircraft with completely independent intellectual property rights, but India can only import its three light aircraft carriers.

Army: Buy Russian T-90S, BMP-2, BMP-3, rifles of all kinds, made in all countries.

Navy: 3 HM2 British cargo, one Russian cargo, nuclear submarines do not have to be leased Russian Air Force: a small number of LCA self-made, the rest are mostly Soviet-made MiG-21, Su-27 series fighters, AWACS aircraft from Israel.

India's equipment is basically imported from Russia, and China's equipment is a copycat from Russia.

For the time being ... India has aircraft carriers, China does not, and everything else should have it.

In the eyes of ordinary Indians, how big is the gap between the military strength of China and India? Just look at India**.

Fought with Pakistan three times, namely:

The First Indo-Pakistani War (1947-1949), which was fought for Kashmir, resulted in India accounting for three-fifths and Pakistan two-fifths.

In the Second Indo-Pakistani War (1965), Pakistan lost some territory to fight for Kashmir.

The Third Indo-Pakistani War (1971) was a time when India intervened in Pakistan's East Pakistan Province, resulting in the loss of East Pakistan Province and the independence of the land into what is now Bangladesh.

After the Third Indo-Pakistani War, there have been several conflicts between India and Pakistan, such as the Siachen Glacier Conflict in 1984 and the Kargil Conflict in 1999.

Fought with Portugal once, the time was 1961, Portugal had several colonies in India: Goa, Daman, Diu, India when it became independent asked Portugal to return, but did not agree, and finally India could not wait and decided to recover by force.

I fought with China once, the time was in 1962, and this online introduction is not wordy, and there are still some conflicts between the two sides after that.

In addition, in 2001, there was a border conflict with Bangladesh, from 1987 to 1990, Sri Lanka was sent to intervene in the fight against the LTTE, and in 1988, it sent troops to the Maldives to quell the coup d'état.

After the Japanese army captured Burma, it wanted to attack India in one go, but it was defeated by the Anglo-Indian coalition forces on the India-Burma border, so this battle alone cannot be said to have invaded India.