What are the advantages of corporate centralization? And the disadvantages of decentralization?

From the perspective of enterprise development, decentralization can mobilize the enthusiasm of subordinates, and it can also enable you to have more time to study the development direction of the enterprise, goals, plan the development strategy of the enterprise, and also have time to study the development of the industry, so that their enterprises are in a favorable position in the competition. Or from an outsider's point of view, I think it is more conducive to the development of your business to look at the problems and future development of your business. However, after decentralization, it is also necessary to strengthen the supervision of enterprises in a timely manner, conduct frequent investigations, grasp some situations, and deal with problems in a timely manner, so that enterprises can be in an invincible position.

Then it depends on what kind of enterprise you are, why the CEO of a state-owned enterprise centralizes power, because only daily power is beneficial, so that employees feel that you have a lot of power, and you can't do anything without looking for you, in fact, it is a trend of interests, and you will not consider what impact it will have on the company. The CEO of a private enterprise is different, he only attaches importance to the efficiency of production and operation, how to achieve good benefits, does not care about the size of power in daily work, and will not seek daily small profits, which will damage the company's big interests.

What are you like now? How's it being managed? Won't it be tiring?

If you can manage it well, and you still feel that you are enjoying it, you can centralize your own power.

If you want to develop talents, or if you want to be lazy or something, just hand over the work at hand to someone you trust.

The right way to organize varies from business to business and from person to person. If you have a suspicious personality, it's best not to divide power. If the system of the enterprise is relatively perfect, then the analysis can be considered.

At the same time, China's macroeconomic environment has fallen into a trough, for the good development of enterprises, please centralize power.

There are a lot of business management materials that can be learned. Sowell Research & Data Center.

Let's not talk about the company. Let's say that a certain interest group can raise the water fee if it wants to, set up the road fee if it wants to, sell the land, and take it back if it wants to take it back without compensation, and of course you can sell it again. Do you think it is better for this interest group to centralize or decentralize?

Advantages of centralized enterprise group financial management: (1) It is convenient to command and arrange a unified financial policy and reduce administrative costs; (2) It is conducive to the parent company to play the role of financial control and achieve the unified financial objectives of the group; (3) It is conducive to giving full play to the role of the parent company's financial experts and reducing the company's financial and operational risks; (4) It is conducive to the unified adjustment of group funds, ensuring capital positions, and reducing capital costs Defects of decentralized enterprise group financial management: (1) It is difficult to unify command and coordination, and some subsidiaries ignore or even damage the overall interests of the company because of the pursuit of their own interests; (2) weakening the financial control function of the parent company, and failing to discover the risks and major problems faced by the subsidiary in a timely manner; (3) It is difficult to effectively restrain the operator, resulting in the problem of "internal controller" of the subsidiary and dampening the enthusiasm of the majority of employees.

Centralization and decentralization are different administrative management methods, and the institutional differences between centralization and decentralization in enterprises: the advantage of decentralization is that it can give full play to the enthusiasm of subordinates;

The advantage of centralization is that it is efficient to operate;

Centralization can be easier to manage! But a high degree of centralization leads to the envy of the desire for power! Leads to blind worship!

Decentralization can effectively decentralize power. Doesn't centralize rights. More conducive to democratization. But it's not easy to manage, and there will be a lot of loopholes!

Through delegation, it is possible to concentrate and manage the functions that are delegated;

Good management should be a combination of these approaches.

The factors influencing centralization and decentralization are: product structure and production technology characteristics, environmental conditions and business strategy, enterprise scale and organizational form, enterprise management level and cadre conditions.

1. Operating conditions and nature of business activities;

2. The size, space and breadth of the organization;

3. The importance of decision-making and the quality of managers;

4. The requirements for the consistency of guidelines and policies and the use of modern control means;

5. The history of the organization and the influence of the leader's personality.

The main factors affecting the centralization and decentralization of enterprises are as follows:

1) The size of the enterprise.

2) Capital investment.

3) Technical level.

4) Product diversification.

5) The strength of interdependence between subsidiaries.

6) Geographical differences in the distribution of subsidiaries.

7) Competitive environment conditions.

Advantages: 1) The government decree is copied uniformly, the standards are consistent, and it is convenient to coordinate the overall situation.

2) Command is convenient, and orders are easy to carry out.

3) There is a DAO conducive to the formation of a unified corporate image.

4) It is easy to form an overwhelming momentum.

5) It is conducive to concentrating on coping with the crisis.

The Communist Party of China is the ruling party of the People's Republic of China, and under the centralized leadership mode of the whole country, it is conducive to the development of the Chinese personality, taking into account the particularity and universality of things, and grasping the key points to build China. Its policies are also flexible and flexible; its leadership style adapts to the adaptation of domestic and foreign environments; The subordinates did not produce the idea of dependence, and advocated democracy and the rule of law; The subordinates actively take responsibility for building our country.

The influencing factors affecting the centralization and decentralization of enterprise organization are: (1) Product structure and production technology characteristics: the enterprise has a single product, strong continuity of the production process, close cooperation in all links, and the senior management of the enterprise should be more centralized; Enterprises operate across multiple industries, the production technology of products is different, and the market sales channels are different, so the degree of decentralization should be increased.

2) Environmental conditions and business strategy: the more complex the environment, the greater the business risk, the greater the degree of decentralization, and the more simple and stable the environment of enterprises can improve the degree of centralization. In addition, the stable strategy is conducive to increasing the degree of corporate centralization, the contraction strategy must also strengthen the centralization of the top level, and the growth strategy requires the expansion of decentralization

3) Enterprise scale and organizational form: the larger the scale of the enterprise, the more departments at the management level in the organizational structure, Zhai should expand decentralization, on the contrary, small enterprises are suitable for centralization. (4) Enterprise management level and cadre conditions:

The enterprise has a high level of management, good quality of cadres at all levels, and has both experience and ability, as well as a sense of responsibility and enterprising, and can expand the decentralization; On the contrary, enterprises lack excellent management talents, and the management level is uneven, so it is necessary to strengthen the centralization of power.

How to answer this question is indeed very difficult to answer! Both decentralization and centralization have historical factors in them, and they are not said out of thin air! The decentralization of power in ancient China was thought to be underdeveloped by the productive forces, and when the productive forces increased, the centralization of power would become larger and larger, and the Ming and Qing dynasties were the most concentrated period of China's imperial power!

And the decentralization of power in the West is a tradition, the historical conditions for their decentralization are in it, they have always been small towns and widows can be democratic, plus their rulers are religions and not kings, and the king has no right to divide it, and the same is true for Japan! This is also the case when China's late Qing Dynasty failed to succeed in carrying out the Wuxu Reform, and the history of the emperor's centralization of power is hundreds or thousands.

However, when functions are concentrated, the additional expenses will also increase, and the corresponding plan can only be taken when the benefits are increased, but the benefits and costs are difficult to calculate directly, and must be carefully measured and evaluated to make the best decision. First, the concept of centralization and decentralization first said the centralized system, centralization is the governance of the enterprise is highly concentrated in the hands of the highest level of governance, centralized command, unified scheduling, the lower level of personnel do not have decision-making power, simply put, one or several people have the final say, and other managers can only obey, can not express opinions. This management style seems to be unsatisfactory, coercive, and not democratic enough, but it has the advantage that it can most effectively unify and integrate resources, so that resources can be used in the best efficiency, but the disadvantages are also obvious, such as the workload of the top leadership is increased, and it is difficult to spare more time to think about the long-term strategic development of the enterprise; It also affects the enthusiasm of subordinates, especially middle-level managers, and is not conducive to the cultivation of enterprise talents.

Decentralization is a completely different mode of management. This way of completely delegating the management authority can delegate the governance of the enterprise to various departments as much as possible, so as to maximize the advantages of hierarchical governance.