India says it will land on the moon around 2020, can it be achieved?

It's hard to say, if Ah San really goes to heaven, most of them are foreign technology, and there must be very few things in his bones, besides, look at Arjun, LCA's, they all blow well, and they can't even play with these gadgets, and they still want to go to heaven! Personally, I don't think there is much hope, even if it goes up, the core cutting-edge technology is definitely foreign, and we don't want him to go up!

No, they know rhetoric.

How noble are you on the third floor? 2b I can't get used to you, this family doesn't pee and look at yourself.

It is impossible for India not to reach the aerospace aspect, as long as it looks at India's missile technology to reflect it, if the development goes well.

In 2020, it is possible that India will develop to the level of manned spacecraft. India's development in all aspects is chaotic and unsound.

A long shot. India has always been thunder and rain.

It's hard to say exactly what will happen in 10 years, but China has achieved a lot of problems in the past 10 years from 2000 to the present, but there are also problems that cannot be overcome, so it's hard to conclude.

There is no hope, for high-tech technology, Indian, Arab, African, and South American nations will not be able to walk in the forefront of the world in a hundred years, and the inferiority of the nation will objectively exist.

As of 2020, there are only three.

The first human landing on the moon was on July 20, 1969, when Apollo landed on the moon. At present, only the United States, China, and Russia have landed on the moon, which shows that the moon landing is very rare.

At 4:30 on November 24, 2020, at the Wenchang Space Launch Site in Hainan, the Long March 5 Yao-5 carrier rocket (hereinafter referred to as the Chang-5 rocket) ignited and lifted the Chang'e-5 probe to the Earth-Moon transfer orbit, opening China's first exoterrestrial object sample return journey.

The launch of Chang'e-5 is the final battle of China's lunar exploration program. According to Yu Dengyun, deputy chief designer of China's lunar exploration project and deputy director of the Science and Technology Committee of the Aerospace Science and Technology Group, Chang'e-5 will achieve four "firsts" in China's aerospace history: the first automatic sampling on the lunar surface, the first take-off from the lunar surface, the first unmanned rendezvous and docking in lunar orbit, and the first high-speed re-entry and return to Earth with lunar soil.

I'm sorry, but if you exclude the Yankees' fraud, no one has actually landed on the moon until now!

Because India is just talking, anyway, bragging is not illegal, and if it is blown, it will be blown up, ** I know that China will be so serious.

India has a large population base, its policies are not as good as China's, the gap between the rich and the poor is obvious, the domestic situation is disordered, and there are constant wars abroad, so the country has to pay less attention to war in research and development.

Because they just have such a goal, it is actually difficult to succeed, and they have not broken through key technologies for so many years, so they have been in research and development.

India is a country with a very poor level of scientific and technological development, after all, their economy is underdeveloped, and to a large extent, they have to rely on the import of scientific and technological products from other countries, but China has a great research and development capacity, and they are not at the same level at all.

If the foundation is not firm, the ground will shake.

There are two main reasons for Chandrayaan-2's failure to land on the moon.

The first is the lack of rocket capacity. The take-off weight of Chandrayaan-2 is actually about the same as that of Chang'e-3, but Chang'e-3 can use the Long March 3B to directly enter the lunar transfer orbit, while Chandrayaan-2 can only use GSLV MK3 to enter the GTO orbit, and then consume the probe's own fuel to slowly climb up. In addition, Chandrayaan-2's own main engine is not powerful, so it took more than a month for the Earth-Moon transfer alone.

The rocket capacity is insufficient, and it is required to land on the moon while orbiting the moon, so there is only a dojo in a snail shell, and in the end the lunar lander and the lunar rover are very small. If the design margin is small, it is naturally easy to have problems. And such a small lunar rover, even if it successfully lands on the moon, it can't actually do anything.

So it didn't have an isotope battery either, and it froze out on a moonlit night, and it wasn't intended to be used for a few days at all.

There are many reasons for the lack of rocket capacity, but in general, India itself does not have a good grasp of key technologies. At present, the level of India's solid rockets is very low, in addition to the large diameter, the two core indicators: specific impulse and reloading coefficient are not up to the level of China in the 80s.

The normal temperature liquid engine imported from France is actually obviously stronger than the YF20 series engine of our old Long March series, but judging from India's long-term inability to master the parallel connection of multiple engines and its inability to militarize it, it is reasonable to guess that the key components and technologies of the engine are in the hands of the French. The cryogenic engine far exceeds China's YF75D from the public performance indicators, but from the actual capacity of the rocket, it is basically certain that its performance cannot reach such indicators.

The second main reason is that Chandrayaan-2 itself lacks core technology. We can find that when Chang'e landed on the moon, there were at least two hovering and obstacle avoidance processes. Chandrayaan-2 does not have this process.

The direct reason is that it lacks a large variable thrust engine, and it relies on shutting down several engines to achieve thrust adjustment, so it is naturally difficult to make it hover. The failure of the moon landing is most likely also due to engine problems. And even if there is no problem with the engine, due to the lack of obstacle avoidance ability, if the ground is uneven, there is a stone or a large crater or something when falling, it will also cause the failure of the moon landing.

In the early days of space development, the probability of failure to land on other celestial bodies was very high, because the computer technology at that time could not achieve autonomous obstacle avoidance (even with variable thrust engines). So at that time, the Apollo spacecraft was under the control of astronauts, and the process of landing on the moon was actually relatively simple.

At present, the Indians are determined to land on the moon as soon as possible, but they do not want to solve the technical problems head-on, but intend to adopt some "ingenious" methods.

What to do if the rocket capacity is insufficient? Simplify the lunar orbiter and free up weight for the lunar lander. There are no variable thrust engines, and they currently have a plan to open the four main engines in all directions, and control the effective thrust by controlling the angle of opening.

These methods seem simple and easy, but it is difficult to say whether they are so simple to do and whether they will cause other problems. But in general, there is a good chance that India will land on the surface of the moon within a few years.

Wait until the divine oil they produce is enough.

If we can successfully land on the moon before China, then India's image as a great power will be affirmed and strengthened, which is a very exciting event for India, which is in line with India's consistent efforts and the ardent expectations of Indian elites.

But landing on the moon is a relatively easy thing, the difficult thing is how to get the people who landed on the moon to return successfully, if you send people to the moon but there is no way to get them back, this kind of inhumane practice will definitely be opposed by all countries in the world, severely condemned by human rights organizations, and will damage India's image.

With India's current technology, it is basically impossible to intercept a man to the moon and return, but if a vehicle is sent to the moon and does not pay attention to the attitude and consequences of falling on the moon, and let it fall on the moon in free fall, India can still try this.

This may be the reason why they failed to go to the moon, they did not summarize their own failure on the moon, but thought about higher goals.

Blind confidence, thinking that the conditions for landing on the moon are already met, but not succeeding but feeling that they have succeeded.

Although the moon landing failed, it is possible to make a long-term plan and there is no conflict.

Because India feels that it is only the last part that has a problem, and what we China can do, they can also do, but they do not have a correct understanding of themselves.

Because if you want to succeed, you must have a goal, and you still have to have a dream, in case it comes true.

The so-called goal is motivation, although you fail once, as long as you are willing to work hard, you will still succeed.

India is very confident in its own technology, but blind self-confidence is conceit.

Because India is researching, it is convenient to only want to reach the goal quickly and neglect to study.

I don't think so, it's impossible to give up on the moon because of a failure.

No, it is impossible to give up such a great subject in one failure, so India should not give up.

Personally, I don't think it will be, failure is the mother of success, and learning from experience will make it better to develop.

Failure is the mother of success, India has long had the ambition to land on the moon, and has gone to the front in the field of Mars, India has not been willing to lag behind other countries in the field of space

No, failure is the mother of success, and you will not give up because of one failure.

It may also be because India's technology is not in place, and India is still relatively backward.

Definitely not, failure is the mother of success, and India will continue to improve.

Personally, I think it will, because the moon landing is very expensive, and India is not a rich country in the first place.

Probably, because India is not a developed country in the first place, and research on this aspect is very expensive.

Personally, I think it should be, because the money required for the moon landing is very large.