Why are implants with hydrophilic surfaces better? Which implant has a hydrophilic surface?

Advantages of hydrophilic implants.

Conventional titanium.

The surfaces are all hydrophobic.

Hence the rejection of liquids. The chemical purity of SLactive (Active Hydrophilic SLA) and the surface it retains allow for excellent hydrophilic properties. This surface allows for rapid attachment of blood and proteins, which speeds up osseointegration around the implant.

3 Rapid bone healing in 4 weeks reduces the early failure rate of implants and sets a new standard in the field of implant dentistry.

It is suitable for a wider range of people, including diabetes and osteoporosis.

smokers, etc. The three advantages of the ITI-SLactive hydrophilic implant are safe, efficient and unique.

1. Safety. The trough of stability is eliminated, resulting in a significant reduction in the early failure rate of dental implants.

2. Efficient. Osseointegration is completed in 3-4 weeks and completed in about 1 month**.

Cause: Produced in a nitrogen environment, it creates a hydrophilic surface and implants in the alveolar bone.

The rear body does not need to decompose the titanium oxide plating on the surface of the hydrophobic implant.

3. Unique. a with Nanotite (3i surface treatment.

There is an overwhelming advantage over the REPLACE surface treatment, which is evidenced by the literature.

b It has a unique osteoinduction function, and the resorption bone may be regained after bone resorption.

c Has soft tissues.

In the case of bone resorption, the soft tissue above the bone can form a dense hemidesmosomesome connection with the slactive surface, preventing bacterial invasion and bone resorption from proceeding.

To put it simply, implants with hydrophilic surfaces have a higher osseointegration rate and a relatively shorter repair time. If it is a non-hydrophilic surface, it will have an oxide layer on the surface, and the oxide layer will be metabolized after implantation, and the vast majority of implant failures occur during a stable trough of 2-4 weeks after implant placement. At this time, if it is an implant with a hydrophilic surface, it can speed up the osseointegration period and improve the success rate of implantation, I don't know if you can understand what I say.

Then, Straumann has a hydrophilic surface, and the doctor will recommend you to use this brand when you go to the hospital, so you can learn more about it.

Hydrophilic dental implants are further optimized with the continuous improvement of dental implant surface treatment technology, hydrophilic implants are conducive to osseointegration, which can shorten the traditional 3-6 months ** cycle to 4-6 weeks, and at the same time increase the osseointegration rate from 60% to more than 90%, so that dental implants are more stable and longer, and can also expand implant indications, such as diabetes and other dental implants with a higher success rate. Not all dental implants can be called hydrophilic, hydrophilic dental implants require a special storage environment, for example, the current international famous brand Straumann uses to keep the implant in a liquid environment to maintain the activity of the implant. The implant hydrophilicity instrument uses photocatalytic technology to reactivate the aging implant surface at the chairside, which is super hydrophilic.

The difference between hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic implants is mainly the coating of the surface and the healing cycle.

Hydrophilic implants are produced under the protection of an inert gas and the implants are stored in normal saline. Non-hydrophilic implants are exposed to air during production and preservation, forming an oxide layer that makes them hydrophobic and repels liquids.

The osseointegration rate of hydrophilic implants is faster than that of non-hydrophilic implants, and the healing cycle of non-hydrophilic implants is generally about 6-8 weeks, while the healing cycle of ITI hydrophilic implants can be shortened to 3-4 weeks, which greatly shortens the healing cycle and reduces the probability of implant failure. At this stage, the hydrophilic surface of the water implant treated with special materials can accelerate the production and binding of bone cells, and improve the probability of success of dental implant surgery.

The history of dental implants

As early as ancient times, people in Europe, the Middle East, and Central America tried to implant jaws to replace missing teeth using a variety of homogeneous or dissimilar materials, including human and animal teeth, carved bones, and shells. In modern times, people have tried to make implants of various shapes using artificial materials, and implant them in or out of the bone to repair missing teeth or provide support for dental restorations. However, these implants do not meet the requirements of the complex oral environment, and a large number of shedding failures occur.

In the mid-20th century, Swede br Nemark observed that the bone tissue of animals could be tightly bonded to an implanted titanium device. He later defined this phenomenon as osseointegration. In 1965, he used the developed osteointegrated titanium implant for the first clinical case, and successfully repaired the cleft palate defect without fail.

In 1982, at the Toronto conference, B.R. Nemark reported on a large 15-year study of osseointegration, which was recognized as a breakthrough in oral medicine. It laid the foundation for a new sub-discipline of stomatology, oral implantology.

In the following decades, dental implants have developed and matured rapidly, and dental implants have become the first choice for dental professionals and edentulous patients as a restoration method that is very similar to the function, structure and aesthetic effect of natural teeth.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Dental Implants.