Which is better between the Nikon D3100 and the Canon SX30 IS?

D3100 is a SLR, SX30 is a small number, 3100 is much better, the two are not the same level, 1,3100 The image sensor is much larger, any place can get a clearer image than SX30, especially in the dark shooting will have an absolute advantage, the image is a lot. This is the most essential difference.

2, The 3100 has a fast response time and can basically pick it up and shoot, while the SX30 has a time delay.

3, The 3100 is more feature-rich, but the SX30 is also sufficient.

The only downside of the 3100 is that the volumetric weight is slightly larger than the SX30.

The only advantage of the SX30 is the telephoto section, which can zoom in on distant scenes, making it a lot of fun to shoot. Its image quality at the telephoto end drops even more, and a lot of the time it's just for fun, the sunlight is good, and if it's a little darker, the imaging is rubbish.

In terms of performance, of course, it is D3100 strong, and SX30IS is slightly more portable, but I personally think that the most suitable is still a single battery, and Sony's NEX-5C is good. Early 4000s. Nikon's P7000 and Canon's G12 are also good choices.

One of the two machines is a more professional SLR, and the other is portable at home, not a level of non-hairless confusion, if the home machine is all-round, there is no need to produce SLR ......It is not worth it to spend ** buyers with portable models, and it is not as practical as ...... card machineFYII......

The thickness of the Canon SX30 is more than 10 centimeters, and the volume is about the same as that of a DSLR with a sleeve.

The Nikon D3100 is a DSLR and is quite cost-effective.

The pixels are almost 14 million,But the sensor area Nikon D3100 is about 7 times that of the SX30,The image quality gap is naturally very huge,You try both,Whether it's feel or image quality or focusing speed or maneuverability,SX30 can't be compared with SLR。

The only advantage of the Canon SX30 is that the zoom ratio is relatively large, and there is basically no need for follow-up investment. However, such a large zoom ratio is not so practical, and the effect of the telephoto of the telephoto machine is likely to be inferior to the ** intercepted part of the SLR shot. The Nikon D3100 is much, much more playable than the telephoto SX30, even with just one pullover.

The two are now ** similar (SX30 is the most expensive telephoto machine, much more expensive than other telephoto machines with similar performance), and the volume is about the same, it is difficult to find a reason to recommend you not to buy a telephoto machine instead of paying.

Well, this is my last time, the same for you. In addition, Nikon D3100's ** can also autofocus (although it is not as good as Sony's single battery, but it is still faster than the consumer-grade DC), which is also very convenient.

Among the two models, Canon SX100 and Canon SX300, Canon SX100 is a model that really exists objectively, while Canon SX300 does not seem to exist. So, compared to the two, of course, the Canon SX100 is better.

The Canon SX100 is a card player released in 2007. It has a 1-inch image sensor with 8.3 million pixels and a 10x optical zoom equivalent of 36-360mm.

And the Canon SX300, it seems that there is no ......Canon has the A300 and the SX30, but it doesn't seem to have the SX300.

As for the Canon SX30 and A300, the two cameras ......

The SX30 is a telephoto camera released in 2010. It has a 1-inch image sensor with 14.1 million pixels and a 35x optical zoom equivalent from 24-840mm.

The A100 is a card player released in 2003. The image sensor size is 1 inch, 3.3 million pixels, and 5x optical zoom.

As you can see, these models are low-end camera ...... with very small image sensor sizesThe SX30 is a relatively high-end camera in terms of overall indicators, but it is also a low-end camera. And it's been released a long time ago......So, none of these cameras are good ......

Summary. Choose Nikon P310. Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 are older models in the camera market that have now been discontinued.

If you have to choose one of these two cameras, you can compare them according to the following aspects:1Shooting performance:

The Nikon P310 uses a 1-inch CMOS sensor, and the Canon S200 uses a 1-inch CCD sensor. The CMOS sensor is more advanced than the CCD sensor, with higher light sensitivity and faster reading speed, so the Nikon P310 is superior in terms of shooting performance. 2.

Operability: Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 are entry-level cameras that are relatively simple to operate. However, the Nikon P310's interface is more intuitive and easier to use.

3.Exterior design: Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 have a simpler exterior design, but the Nikon P310 has a more refined appearance and a better feel.

4.**: Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 are relatively close, but the Nikon P310 is slightly higher.

Choose Nikon P310. Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 are older models in the camera market that have now been discontinued. If you have to choose one of the two cameras, you can compare them based on the following aspects:

1.Shooting performance: The Nikon P310 uses a 1-inch CMOS sensor, and the Canon S200 uses a 1-inch CCD sensor.

The CMOS sensor is more advanced than the CCD sensor, with higher light sensitivity and faster reading speed, so the Nikon P310 is superior in terms of shooting performance. 2.Operational Performance:

Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 are entry-level cameras, and the operation is relatively simple. However, the Nikon P310's interface is more intuitive and easier to use. 3.

Exterior design: Both the Nikon P310 and the Canon S200 have a simpler exterior design, but the Nikon P310 has a more refined appearance and a better feel. 4.

**: Nikon P310 and Canon S200 are both relatively close, but Nikon P310's is slightly higher.

Based on the comparison of the above aspects, if you must choose one of the two cameras, it is recommended to choose the Nikon P310.