How much does a Nikon D600 offer? When is the right time to start?

10,000, the time to start depends on when you need it, because I will be in the north and there will be nothing to shine on, if I start next year's spring, then you can shine on the spring scene, ** can be more stable than now.

If you have a bad money, you will be waiting for 3 months to half a year. Wait** is steady.

It's not bad for that little money, when to use it and when to buy it. If you buy it, you will learn it first and use it first.

I bought the D90 4 years ago, and I forgot what ** I did at that time, and then I didn't think about whether it was the cheapest time. Buy first and play first. Anyway, I bought a few heads of silver later, and I didn't spend less.

SLR is burning money, especially if you want to buy a full-frame like D600, the money will not be less in the future.

Finally advised, buy it now if you need it. If you buy a camera, you still need a head, a flash, a tripod, a camera bag, and a UV lens. According to your fuselage, there is no 50,000 that is not matched.

Buy a camera with a 24-70 head first, play for a few months, and then see if you get into the flash and tripod, as for what head to enter, you will understand it yourself after you play it yourself for half a year.

The current ** is about 1w3.

When it's the right time to get it all depends on when you need it.

If you only look at **, of course, the later you start, the cheaper it is, the more suitable it is, and the key is to be able to wait.

D600's ** can generally be stable in about half a year. Get it when the time comes.

**Major** just search to know, right? Generally, the camera is more reasonable after three months on the market (it may still be expensive, but it is not too expensive, buy early and shoot early, the expensive little bit is still worth it).

At present, the included ticket** is 14490 yuan. The new product must be a bit high, so let's see it in half a year. However, it is difficult to have a significant price reduction before the new product comes out.

Hello, at present, ** is 13490 yuan, and it is more appropriate to start after half a year.

Since you are a student, it is better to save some money for your parents, and the following is a more cost-effective plan.

1.Sigma 12-24, the widest full-width ultra-wide corners at present, the picture quality is also very good, and it is very easy to shoot architecture, **4400 or so.

2.Travel hang-up head, Nikon 28-300VR, the picture quality is quite good Tianya mirror, although the workmanship is average, but cost-effective, and convenient, **6000 yuan or so.

3.Tenglong 90 micro, can not only shoot macro but also make a cameo portrait, Hong Kong line **2200 or so.

The above three heads add up to about 12,600, of which 90 micro can be replaced by 50 Sigma 50 or 85, ** are also about the same.

If you want to enter three yuan in the future, then the second-hand will be sold out, the lens is still relatively valuable, and you won't lose much money if you sell it in good condition.

Personal advice:

1. Hang up head:

The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm F ed that the landlord said is very good!!

Just pick it. 2. Wide-angle lens:

The Nikon AF-S 14-24mm F ed that the landlord said is very good, so that's it

3. Architectural Photography:

What the landlord said about architectural photography, is it just a record? Or do you want to be able to reflect the structure and perspective of the building more realistically......?

Personal tip: The Nikon PC-E Micro 45mm F ed eliminates the problem of vertical line convergence and is able to faithfully document every aspect of the building.

4. About the tourist head:

Personal recommendation: Add the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm F ED VR I to the AF-S 24-70mm F ED.

The two work together, and there is no problem in most scenarios.

Considering factors such as focusing on architecture, taking into account tourism and portraits, especially "starting with the big three yuan in the future", the lens selection should be based on architectural photography. The subject matter of architectural photography is very wide, and it is not much different from the requirements of other photography, so it is necessary to start with the particularity.

The particularity of architectural photography is mainly to reduce distortion, reduce perspective, and be faithful to architecture. In traditional photography, medium and large-format cameras are mostly used to shoot buildings, because the area of the negative is relatively large, the focal length of the standard lens is relatively long, and the sense of perspective is the least. In addition, a tilt-shift camera has been designed specifically for architectural photography. In the digital age, in addition to medium and large formats, the size of the 135 SLR camera is generally small, and the design and processing technology of the fixed focal head of the full-frame camera are complex, and the market is small and the money is less.

Therefore, more zoom heads (such as wide-angle to medium-focus, medium-focus to telephoto, etc.) are added to meet the needs and choices of general users. As you mentioned, can the 28-300mm lens be called a tourist lens? This is just to meet the requirements of the general user--- take the lead less, reduce the portion.

But in fact, 28-300 is heavy enough on its own.

From the perspective of architectural photography, the fixed focal point should be the first choice, whether it is lens distortion, perspective sense, aperture and other aspects, it can take into account, and the applicability of the photographic subject is also relatively strong.

Suggestions: 1. Nikon AF Fisheye 16mm F, shoot large scenes, architectural complexes, tourism, etc.

2. Nikon AF-S 50mm F G, portraits, small buildings, etc. --- serious headers.

3. Nikon AF-S 85mm F, serious architectural photography camera, portrait, architectural sketches.

4. Nikon AF-S 28-300mm F ED

Wide angle for architectural photography is a must, 16-35 or 17-35 can be considered, and it can also be used to shoot some landscapes in large scenes; As for 14-24, it is too expensive, and the scope of use is too small, of course, if the landlord needs it, it can also be considered.

The others are equipped with a 70-200, which is very good for shooting long shots and portraits, so that these two lenses are both large ternary or small ternary, and then equipped with a 24-70 or 24-120 are complete, which is still very suitable. These shots hold their value very well, so money is not wasted.

Or the landlord buys a 28-300 lens to go around the world, and after shooting for a period of time, he knows what kind of lens he needs, and then matches it with 14-24, after all, he buys a camera to shoot buildings, and everything else is incidental. After being proficient, it will be sold to buy large and small three yuan, or with a few good fixed focus head assistance, which is more suitable for novices, after all, no matter how much others say, there is no depth of their own experience.

At this stage, if you really lack funds, you can consider the sub-factory lens, such as Tamron, Sigma, etc., although the quality is poor, but only with the full focal length, it is a transitional product, why should it be so good!

Moreover, why should the landlord start with D600, it is the same as Canon 6D, just released**It is a bit inflated, it is not cost-effective, it is better to start D700 (the pixel is a little low, it may not be very suitable) or 5D2, although it has been released for more than four years, but it is still a rare magic machine, **It may be cheaper than D600, and some functions are also strong, after all, the positioning is higher than D600, all three are full-frame models, and the quality is absolutely ***.

1. Personally, I think it is more appropriate to choose "Sigma 12-24". The original 14-24 image quality and aperture are not to be said.,It's definitely the best.。。。 But the last thing you need to shoot architecture and travel is the picture quality, so I personally think I'd rather choose the wider "Sigma 12-24".

2. I personally prefer 24-120... Travel telephoto is rarely used.,But this depends on personal habits.。。。 24-70 is definitely not recommended, it's too heavy, the picture quality is too good, and it's completely a knife for killing.

If you want to study architecture, you must buy a tilt-shift lens, the others are floating clouds, and it is the most suitable to buy a 24mm one first!

Then if you have extra money, you can choose 24-70, and if you want to sweep the streets, you have to buy 70-200, but I recommend buying a portrait,!

The order of buying lenses is 24mm tilt shift, 27-70mm, 85, mm, 70-200

Everyone else has recommended it, but I only recommend a PC-E24mm F ed tilt-shift lens, which is about 10,000 bars, which is necessary for shooting architecture, but it is very complicated to use.

If you choose the original factory, of course, it is 14-24, and the gold wide angle is a little old.

If you hang up the head, it's really not easy to choose, look at the money.

For portraits, the **85 prime lens is the best, and it is very cost-effective.

Wide-angle 14-24 will do! The hang-up must be 24-70!

It's Canon 600D, Nikon doesn't have this one, Entry-level recommendation to choose Nikon, the workmanship is real, D5100 is a good choice, you can go and see it.