Open book may not be useful for debate information, and seeking open book may not be beneficial VS o

I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book. It is true that reading books can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

A philosopher once said that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, true scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when they read books, they just flip through the pages casually, some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude.

The idiom "open book is beneficial", as an emphasis on the importance of reading, naturally has its positive significance, but if it is used as an assertion that "open book" is "beneficial", it is inappropriate We feel that some people have read a lot of books, but they have not learned the good ones, and they have learned a lot of bad ones. We think that open books are not necessarily beneficial, because we feel that there are many books on the market today with unhealthy content, and they cannot play any role in human development at all, but have a negative impact. We believe that people now read, only selective reading can be gained, and those indiscriminate reading are useless to increase people's talents!

I think it's beneficial to open the book. Gorky said, "Books are the ladder of human progress."

Read more and you will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspired by them, and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.

The world's famous Bacon once said: "History makes people wise, poetry makes people wise, mathematics makes people fine, naturalism makes people profound, and ethics makes people dignified." These many meanings can be summed up in one word: opening the book is beneficial. If we don't read more, where will it come from?

What about so much knowledge? If we don't have knowledge, how can we discern who is right from wrong?