Unbook is not necessarily beneficial

1.Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

2.The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you."

If you understand one-sidedly that "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not right! We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

3.I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book. It is true that reading books can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened. I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book.

It is true that reading books can increase people's knowledge, cultivate their temperament, and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening the book" is only a necessary condition for "benefit", not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

If it's a book that's harmful to your physical or mental health, you shouldn't read it.

Some books are not useful to us, so opening them is not necessarily beneficial.