The difference between big head and pig head , the former is borrowed? Is the latter a metaphor?

It must be a metaphor.

There will be mistakes.

Borrowing is to use a small part of the generation as a whole, for example, there is a group of red scarves in the playground, the red scarf is borrowed, and the borrowing is a kind of metaphor, which is divided into three types: simile and metaphor, and the difference between borrowing and borrowing can be started from the following four aspects:

The essence of metaphor is "metaphor", although its ontology and metaphor do not appear, but it implies a comparable object (i.e., ontology). The essence of borrowing is "generation", which refers to the ontology with a certain characteristic of things, and there is no comparable object.

Because it is a "metaphor", it can generally be supplemented with "ontology" and "metaphor". There is no comparable thing to borrow, and it cannot be supplemented in this way.

Borrowing can generally be used to describe the ontology that does not appear. Borrowing can only play the role of "generation", and most of the words used in it are nouns or noun phrases, which cannot play a descriptive role.

In an article, if the figurative sentence "like" appears in the front, and the metaphor is directly used in the later text, it becomes a borrowing.

Borrowing from generation is only a metaphor, borrowing from a metaphor is a metaphor. Borrowing can be rewritten into a noun or metaphor, but borrowing is not.

They all use B instead of A, that is, they do not appear on the ontology, but speak with the borrowed body. This is the similarity between the two. But there is a difference between borrowing and borrowing.

The basis of the metaphor is the similarity between the ontology and the metaphor, it is the metaphor in the borrowing, and the focus is"Yu"；The basis of borrowing is the correlation between borrowing and ontology, there is no figurative relationship between them, and the emphasis is on referents. For example:"Zhongshan is pale and yellow from wind and rain"(*** "Seven Laws.

The People's Liberation Army occupies Nanjing)."Zhongshan"Instead of Nanjing, because Zhongshan (i.e., Purple Mountain) is located near Nanjing, and it is related to Nanjing, so it is borrowed. While"Wind and rain"instead"Revolutionary situation", because of it and"Revolutionary situation"There are similarities, so it's a metaphor. It is also possible to distinguish between borrowing and borrowing by using the method of constructing similes.

Find out the ontology if you can add it"Elephant"What constitutes a simile is a metaphor; Otherwise, it is borrowing.

I am also a teacher who has just graduated from the vocational education center, it is very simple, borrowing is a related thing, borrowing is a similar thing, borrowing can change a simile but borrowing can not, to give a simple example, this morning I saw the red scarf helping the grandmother cross the road, the red scarf refers to the Young Pioneers, but it cannot be said that the red scarf is the Young Pioneers, they only have relevance and no similarity, give an example of borrowing.

We can't let these violent cartoons poison our seedlings.

Seedlings refer to children, and it can be said that children are as immature as seedlings and need to be protected. There are similarities between the two.

The most important difference between figurative and borrowed meanings is that the former focuses on similarity, while the latter focuses on relevance.

Borrowing and borrowing are similar in that they both use one thing for another, but their nature is completely different. Borrowing is a generation in a metaphor, and borrowing is a generation but not a metaphor; Borrowing focuses on similarity, and borrowing focuses on relevance; Borrowing can be changed to similes, but borrowing is not.

There is a real relationship between the borrowing ontology and the borrowing body, and generally speaking, this relationship is quite close;

The ontology of metaphor and metaphor are fundamentally different things, and people only associate them by association according to the similarities they have.

A metaphor is a kind of metaphor, in which the metaphorical thing is directly borrowed to replace the metaphorical thing, and the metaphorical thing and the metaphorical word do not appear;

And borrowing is not to directly say the name of the thing to be said, but to replace it with the name of another thing that is related to it.

There is a great similarity between the two. To distinguish between them, the main thing is to grasp whether it is similarity or relevance: if there is a similarity between the original thing and the thing that replaces it, it is a metaphor; To be relevant is to borrow.

The easiest way to distinguish between borrowing and borrowing is that borrowing can be reduced to a simile, but borrowing is not. Borrowing is a kind of metaphor that omits the ontology and figurative words, and the ontology can be found out according to the specific context, and the word "like" is added to reduce the borrowing metaphor to the form of a simile. For example:

What is the ambition of the bird? "Birdfinches" and "birds" are both metaphors, and we reduce them to similes: those who are short-sighted are like small birds; He is like a bird soaring thousands of miles.

Substitution is the substitution of thing A for thing B, and the connection between things A and B is related in some way. Remember that it is the relevance, that the parts can take the place of the whole, and that the characteristics can take the place of the things. For example:

There's a red scarf over there. The "red scarf" is borrowed, and it is to replace the Young Pioneers with the logo of the Young Pioneers. It can't be said that the junior team members are like red scarves.

Another example: power comes out of the barrel of a gun. "Barrel of a gun" is a substitute for "barrel of a gun" instead of "armed struggle".

Because "armed struggle" must be carried out with the barrel of a gun, there is a connection between the two. It cannot be said that armed struggle is like the barrel of a gun. In Lu Xun's "Hometown", there are two situations in the description of Yang Er's sister-in-law, one is that the author directly says that Yang Er's sister-in-law is like a compass in a drawing instrument, which is a metaphor.

But the example you gave used the characteristics of Yang Er's sister-in-law to replace Yang Er's sister-in-law, which is a metaphor at this time.

Borrowing is a kind of metaphor, and there is a similarity between the two things that are compared and used for comparison, and there is no correlation, so even if there is no metaphor "like" between the ontology and the metaphor, the word "like" can be added and replaced with a simile.

Borrowing is to replace the thing to be expressed with related things, there is no similarity between the ontology and the borrowing, only relevance, so the word "like" cannot be replaced with a simile.

Removing the garbage from your language doesn't happen overnight. It is a metaphor, and the garbage metaphor has similarities.

He has ink in his stomach and a nimble brain. It is borrowing, and ink borrowing is related to knowledge.

First, the focus is different.

1. Borrowing focuses on expressing the similarity between the ontology and the metaphor.

For example, I knew that there was a sadly thick barrier between us. (Modern Lu Xun's "Hometown").

It focuses on the similarity between "the separation between me and the intercalary earth" and the "thick barrier" that is "deep and thick, separating the two things and making the two things boundary", which is a metaphor.

2. Borrowing focuses on explaining the correlation between ontology and borrowing.

Such as: Sir, give cash money, Yuan Shikai, can't you? (Modern Ye Shengtao's "Overcharged Three or Five Buckets").

It focuses on explaining the correlation between "current foreign money" and "Yuan Shikai" ("Yuan Shikai" is the logo of "foreign money"), which is a loan.

Second, the role is different.

1. The function of metaphor is to visualize the ontology.

2. The role of borrowing is to change the name of the ontology.

3. Different rhetorical devices.

1. Substitution is a rhetorical device, which refers to not directly saying the name of the thing to be said, but using the name of another thing related to it to call it.

Borrowing, as the name suggests, is to borrow one thing to replace another, so most borrowed pronouns are nouns. When using, it is necessary to consider the legitimacy and universality of substitution, try to simplify it into complexity, and make the meaning of the text smooth. Moreover, the borrowing at this time is generally similar to seeing the big from the small, and using small things to reflect the big situation or situation, so as to make the sentence more vivid and concrete.

2. Borrowing is a kind of metaphor. It is to replace the ontology with a metaphor, and the ontology and metaphor do not appear, and directly say A (ontology) as B (metaphor). Because the metaphor only appears, it can produce a deeper and more subtle expression effect, and at the same time make the language more concise.

What are the similarities and differences between borrowing and borrowing?

The difference between borrowing and borrowing in ——— book excerpt is manifested in:

1. The basis of borrowing is the similarity of things, and the basis of borrowing is the relevance of things. Such as today to criticize that parasite.

Today criticize that crooked mouth.

The parasite is a metaphor that has a similar relationship with the person it replaces. The crooked mouth is borrowed, and the relationship between it and the person it replaces is not similar but related (the crooked mouth is a part of that person himself).

Second, borrowing metaphors can be changed to similes, but borrowing substitutions cannot. For example, the first example sentence can be changed to "Today criticize the guy who lives like a parasite". The second example sentence cannot be changed to "Today criticize the guy who is like a crooked mouth", because the crooked mouth is a characteristic of the person itself, not a question of likeness.