Is digital camera stabilization really that important? Yikes

To put it simply, camera image stabilization is divided into CCD image stabilization, optical image stabilization (or lens image stabilization), electronic image stabilization, among which do not buy electronic image stabilization, which is at the expense of imaging quality, the other two can be bought.

Stabilization is mainly used for large magnifications and when the light is relatively low. Because, when zooming in large magnification, the shaking of the hand will easily blur the ** photo, and when the light is dark, the shutter speed will be slower, for example, half a second, it is difficult to do the hand motionless for such a long time, and the stabilization will also play a certain role.

Overall, if it's not a camera with more than five times optical zoom, stabilization isn't very useful, and it consumes a lot of power, but it's still useful if you think you're shooting with an old and unsteady hand. Decide for yourself.

The grade of the digital camera is not necessarily in the pixels and sharpness, the above is very detailed, it can process millions of data in a very short time, it is the real effort, if you want to buy it, you have to shake it when you test it!

Anti-shake is to avoid hand shake from affecting the clarity of the photo, because when people press the camera button, the image will be blurry. If you have stabilization, it will prolong the scene that has just been set.

The night scene shot by shaking is also an art.

First, the structure is different.

1. Anti-shake: The light path of hand shake is compensated by the movement of movable parts in the camera, such as the lens group or the sensor, so as to minimize the blur and appearance caused by the shake during use.

2. No anti-shake: There are no movable parts inside, and it is directly a single-lens reflex body.

Second, the use requirements are different.

1. Anti-shake: The angle of view of the focal length interrogator lens is small, and a slight shake will have a greater impact on the imaging, and the large zoom lens and the long focal length lens have higher requirements for image stabilization.

2. No image stabilization: The framing angle of the lens at the short focal length end is large, and the same degree of shake has a relatively small impact on the image sensor;

Third, the advantages and disadvantages are different.

1. Anti-shake: Anti-shake technology can solve the problem of hand shake very well, and anti-shake technology will also reduce the sharpness of the internal image.

2. No stabilization: It will not cause a decrease in sharpness, which may cause blurry images at that time.

Different manufacturers and models of cameras use different stabilization modes. Specifically, there are two types of in-body image stabilization and lens image stabilization.

Camera stabilization is a technology that reduces the low yield caused by shake when the user shoots with a handheld camera. The principle is that the anti-shake mechanism of the camera detects the shake generated when the user holds the camera, and then calculates the shake state and the amount of shake when the user holds the camera through the processor calculation, and then controls the anti-shake mechanism of the camera to produce the corresponding movement to offset the shake generated by the user's handheld camera, so that the camera can obtain the picture in a stable state when shooting, and improve the success rate of filming.

The principle is the same, but the way to implement stabilization is different......Specifically, there are two methods: body image stabilization and lens image stabilization. ......Body stabilization is the image sensor that controls the camera by the stabilization mechanism.

A state that produces motion to counteract jitter. Lens stabilization is a state in which the stabilization mechanism controls the motion of a certain group of lens groups in the lens to counteract the shake. Although the principles are different, the end result is the same ......

In general, SLR cameras.

Lens stabilization is used. Mirrorless camera.

The use of body stabilization. If you use your own DSLR lens to transfer to your own mirrorless body, it is said that body stabilization and lens stabilization can work together to bring a stronger stabilization effect.

However, stabilization isn't a ...... that works well at all timesIn the handheld state, stabilization is definitely useful and effective. However, if you shoot on a tripod, the stabilization function will be turned off......This is because the camera's stabilization settings are designed for low-frequency vibrations when shooting handheld. On the tripod, it is a state of high-frequency vibration, and the anti-shake mechanism is powerless, and even counterproductive......So, it's time to turn off the ...... stabilizationThe secondary lens must be turned off, and the original lens is best turned off ......

In a DSLR camera, if the body is not stabilized, it does not have the stabilization function.

If the SLR camera does not stabilize the image, the picture is blurred due to the vibration of the SLR camera, so you can't get a good **, and if you want to shoot a non-blurry **, you must use a tripod as a support to stabilize the camera.

When taking pictures with a DSLR camera, there will be a slight tremor in the hand, which will make the shooting blurry, so some SLR bodies have added an anti-shake function, which can avoid the shaking of the handheld SLR camera or the shake caused by the movement of the reflector in the SLR camera, the anti-shake lens can ensure that you shoot more clearly under the lower shutter, but whether you are out of focus still depends on luck. Both Canon's and Nikon's DSLR bodies are non-shake-safe, and stabilization is achieved by the lens.

In-body stabilization is mainly achieved by using CCD or CMOS reverse displacement, so that any lens can be used to stabilize the image.

Canon, Nikon, these SLRs, all use lens image stabilization. Theoretically, the success rate of lens stabilization is slightly higher.

If the body does not have image stabilization, it depends on lens image stabilization, such as Canon and Nikon, etc., and if the body has image stabilization, it relies on body image stabilization, such as Sony

The effect is pretty much the same

The biggest difference is the price, and the lens stabilization is used to cheat money, and you look at the same lens, and the difference between stabilization and non-stabilization

And then you add this difference to each lens, and you see how much more it costs and how much more the manufacturer can make

Propose not to stabilize the shake?

Yes, among the major brands of SLR cameras, only Canon and Nikon do not have body stabilization, so many of Canon and Nikon's lenses have image stabilization. Canon's lenses are marked with IS, and Nikon's lenses are marked with VR, which means image stabilization.

Among other brands, such as Sony, Pentax, and Olympus, they all have body stabilization. If you buy this kind of camera, it is equivalent to all lenses with image stabilization, which is more affordable than Canon and Nikon, at least you don't have to spend extra money for the stabilization of each lens.

The body does not have anti-shake means that the camera itself does not have the anti-shake function, and the following methods must be taken to ensure the best clarity when shooting: 1. Increase the shutter speed; 2. Improve the ability of handheld shooting; 3. an upper tripod; 4. Use anti-shake lens. At present, Canon and Nikon do not have a single-lens reflex with body stabilization function, only anti-shake lenses, and Sony, Olympus, Pentax and other single-lens reflexers have a body stabilization function.

SLR stabilization is divided into body stabilization and lens stabilization. There are Nikon, Sony, Pentax and other machines with body stabilization, and Canon's body has no image stabilization design, all of which are lens image stabilization.

Whether it is lens stabilization or body stabilization, it actually has the effect of increasing the shutter speed by 4 stops, for example, if you shoot in a dark scene, the shutter speed is half a second, the handheld camera will definitely shake, and the photo will be blurry. If there is an anti-shake function, the shutter speed will reach one-eighth of a second in the same scene, which can effectively reduce the shake and make ** clearer.

Hope it helps!

There are two types of anti-shake for SLR cameras on the market: one is body anti-shake and the other is lens anti-shake.

The effect of lens stabilization is more obvious, to put it simply, you use a mirror to the sun and hit a spot of light on the wall, do you want the spot to move, is it convenient to move the mirror or move the wall?

Now the mainstream lens stabilization can reduce the shutter speed by 4 stops for handheld shooting, but when buying lenses in the future, each lens needs to have image stabilization, and this ** is not cheap.