Does the blacklist affect children?

You didn't make it clear which "blacklist" it was

If it refers to the court's "list of judgment defaulters", then it has an impact on the children, the direct impact is to prohibit the children from entering private or international schools with high tuition fees, and the indirect impact is once known by the students, so that the children have no face in front of their classmates;

If it is a blacklist issued by the industrial and commercial department, safety supervision department and other departments from the perspective of industry supervision, it will have no impact on the children.

Hope, thank you.

Does personal credit reporting dishonesty affect children, explained as follows:1. In a sense, having a bad record in personal credit reporting will not affect the children, because the credit blacklist is different from the judgment defaulter, and there are no compulsory measures, but only affect the borrower's personal credit business, and have nothing to do with the children's families.

2. However, if the bank and financial institutions sue you, then the child and the wild girl cannot attend a high-cost private school, and the parents are "old friends", for some schools with strict political examination, the child's qualification examination is very stupid and can not pass, and more seriously it will affect joining the army, applying for military schools, participating in civil servants, public institutions, state-owned enterprise examinations, etc.

3. All in all, if it is only a credit blacklist, it will have no impact on the children, at most it will be an impact on individual house purchases, card applications, etc., do not rise to the level of dishonest people, and the bridge will have a lot of impact.

The blacklist only affects the person and his or her spouse, and has no effect on others. As long as the children have good personal credit, they can still borrow from the bank. But if it is a minor child who needs to be raised by his parents, and the parents are on the blacklist, it will naturally have a more or less indirect impact on the child, legal basis:

Article 1 of the Supreme People's Court's Several Provisions on Letters and Responses on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters.

In any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall enter them into the list of judgment defaulters and give them credit punishments in accordance with law:

1) Refusal to perform obligations set forth in effective legal documents despite having the ability to perform;

2) Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as fabricating evidence, violence, or threats;

3) Evading enforcement by means such as sham litigation or arbitration, or concealment or transfer of assets;

4) Violating the financial and financial reporting system;

5) Violating an order restricting spending;

6) Refusal to perform on the enforcement of a settlement agreement without a legitimate reason.

Does personal credit reporting dishonesty affect children, explained as follows:1. In a sense, having a bad record in personal credit reporting will not affect the children, because the credit blacklist is different from the judgment defaulter, and there are no compulsory measures, but only affect the borrower's personal credit business, and have nothing to do with the children's families.

2. However, if the bank and financial institutions sue you, then the children cannot attend high-cost private schools, and the parents are "old friends", for some schools with strict political examination, the child's qualification examination is likely to fail, and more seriously it will affect joining the army, applying for military schools, participating in civil servants, public institutions, state-owned enterprise examinations, etc.

3. All in all, if it is only a credit blacklist, it will have no impact on children, at most it will be an impact on individual house purchases, card applications, etc., and do not rise to the level of dishonest people, then the impact will be greater.

Not having their children on the blacklist will not affect their parents, because it is now a legal society, and they will do their own things and bear their own responsibilities, and they will not involve others.

Questions. Will the blacklisting of a child cause the parents' property?

In 2020 there were. Is there such a new policy?

Personally, I don't think so.

It will not affect parents, according to relevant laws and regulations, the blacklist of credit investigation only affects the person, and has nothing to do with other relatives and friends, and this blacklist of dishonesty is only for individuals.

Questions. Don't know the correct answer.

No, don't worry! Questions. Oh.

I wish you a happy life and all the best!

Questions. For custody. Will there be a connection between the parental property?

For the cost of raising children, the lazy will not be able to attract property to the parents.

There is no influence on the parents, and the property of the parents will not be enforced.

Legal Analysis: No impact on others. Zi refers to Min Xiannu, as long as her personal credit is good, she can still borrow from the bank.

However, if a minor child needs to be raised by his parents, and the parents are on the blacklist, it will naturally have a more or less indirect impact on the child, legal basis: "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters" Article 1: Where the person subject to enforcement fails to perform the obligations set forth in the effective legal documents, and has any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall include them in the list of judgment defaulters, and give them credit punishments in accordance with law:

1) Refusal to perform obligations set forth in effective legal documents despite having the ability to perform;

2) Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as fabricating evidence, violence, or threats;

3) Evading enforcement by means such as false litigation, false arbitration, or concealment or transfer of assets;

4) Violating the property reporting system;

5) Violating an order restricting spending;

6) Refusal to perform on the enforcement of a settlement agreement without a legitimate reason.