What is good for a non full frame Nikon SLR with a wide angle lens

Medium and low**: 18-35 silver wide angle (cheap and excellent old man), 16-85 (decent, practical and excellent), Tamron 17-50VC (both anti-shake and large aperture, cost-effective), Tamron 10-24 (low price and wider viewing angle than others), Sigma 12-24 second generation (new workmanship and high optical quality), Tokinra 12-24 (decent, well-made), Tokinra 10-17 (taking into account fisheye and ultra-wide angle characteristics, average picture quality).

High-end: 17-55 (DX mirror, excellent quality, not cost-effective), 17-35 gold wide angle (top workmanship and top imaging), 16-35 (wide angle with image stabilization, practical and image quality comparable to gold wide angle), 14-24 large bulb (top imaging level comparable to fixed focus).

I also have another similar question, I don't know if it can be used as a reference, Nikon is not a full-frame SLR, and the ultra-wide-angle lens is generally considered as the following.

Generally, when considering the lens, the first choice is the original factory, because the original factory will have accurate calibration (its own bayonet) when it leaves the factory, and the focusing accuracy is much higher than that of the sub-factory.

If you want to ** in the future, the original factory is much better than the deputy factory.

Besides, Nikon's 1024 effect is still okay.

The focal length is also more convenient.

Sigma 1020,There are more people who use this lens,Word of mouth is still okay,The disadvantage is that the image quality at the edge is more powerful,If you think the original is expensive,Choose this。

ATX116,The reputation is very good,The advantage is that the aperture is large,High sharpness,The disadvantage is that the dispersion is more powerful,This seems to be a common problem of Tuli,There is also a focal length is too narrow,Sometimes it's not very convenient,In fact, there is another advantage,Hehe,Tuli's lens is too compatible with Nikon's machine,The difference between the outside ** and the original factory is very small。

Sigma 816, this shot, alas.

It's too wide, although the deformation can be controlled, but after all, it's too wide, basically the shape of the ** can be accepted by me above 12mm, hehe, maybe I'm too demanding.

In addition, there is another one, that is, this lens cannot be filtered, which makes people's heads bigger, and more seriously, this lens is top-heavy, that is to say, if this lens accidentally lands, it must be the head on the ground, and the head cannot be equipped with a protective lens. If you choose this, protect it.

In addition, the aperture of this lens is too small and it is also a weakness, so it can only shoot outdoor sunlight films, or put it on the shelf, which is really not as convenient to use as the others.

In fact, Nikon's wide angle is good, if it is a DX remnant, the doghead 18-55 is a very good DX lens, and the scenery is very good.

If you're on a budget, 14-24 bulbs are the way to go.

The budget is average, then choose the silver wide-angle 18-35, both new and old can be, and the wide-angle picture quality is great.

17-35 Gold wide angle is not recommended, after all, it is a D head, the cost performance is average, except for the aperture is larger, it is not bad silver wide angle.

16-35 4 small ternary, very good head, whether it is image quality or focal length practicability, or workmanship, the only drawback is that it is slightly expensive.

The original 24 is also an option for the Star Dog, which is a little more expensive.

After talking about the original factory, let's talk about the super cost-effective sub-factory, Sanyang 14 manual head, ** cheap, the effect is acceptable, the most cost-effective choice for shooting the starry sky, if you can't afford 14-24, then buy it.

If it's a DX remnant machine, then Tuli's 11-16 is not bad, the feeling of ultra-wide is still great, and the distortion control is average.

Sigma's 12-24 is forgotten, and the distortion is generally average.

Tokina's 16-28 is relatively niche, but it is really good, although it is not as good as the original 16-35, but the cost performance is super high.

Let's start with that.

What is your ideal price point?

It depends on your requirements and**.

At the moment, the full-frame wide-angle lens that is worth buying among the original lenses is the Nikon 14-24 Niu Wide Angle.

As for the ...... of the wide-angle lens of the analogueSigma 12-24F4 or Sigma is a great choice.

Nikon full-width worthy of the wide-angle Nikkor 14-24