How safe do you think autonomous driving is?

With the improvement of current technology, the safety of autonomous driving will become better and better, and it will perceive the danger that people cannot perceive in time.

Autonomous driving technology is not very mature at present, and can only be used as an assisted driver, especially now that cars are engaged in cloud networking and the like, you are not afraid of hacker intrusion, or automatic driving failure, in short, I am not at ease to hand over my life to a cold machine. It is better to be artificial, and it can respond to various emergencies in a timely manner.

Ninety-four percent of crashes are due to human error. Self-driving cars, on the other hand, are able to send relevant warnings at all times and focus on driving. In addition, the combination of artificial intelligence technology and road test experience can further improve driver safety.

Autonomous driving is relatively safe for novices, because automatic driving will not do other unpredictable things due to emergencies, and will not use the brakes as accelerators because of their carelessness.

Don't worry, it's always good-looking, and now the technology is not high to this extent! Slow response is the disadvantage of high-tech products, and this technology is that time is life.

We know that autonomous driving can be technically realized, and self-driving cars need to carry out a lot of data processing and learning, and it is relatively safe to write enough programs for the car driving system to carry out driving feedback and accident handling.

Self-driving cars are not very mature anyway, and there are also people who say that there are accidents with autonomous driving, so I want to ask, if there is an accident with a self-driving car, is the car company responsible, or the driver is responsible, and the safety side is not careful, and many problems still need to be solved, and now I am personally not at ease.

I think it's still very good, I believe that the current technology is getting better and better, people will be tired but machines will not.

The intelligent driving system is very complex, of course, the computer does not analyze everything, and it will make you feel a lot of distrust when using it.

Cars require a lot of actual road data to analyze and calculate, and it is very difficult to collect data, and I think it is safe when no one is driving.

I feel really safe, it must have been checked accordingly, so it's still very safe, and we should trust Chinese technology.

It is unsafe because the technology of autonomous driving is not particularly mature, so it is easy to have accidents and has a particularly serious danger.

No. Many self-driving cars have had some safety problems, which have caused a lot of traffic accidents.

It's really safe, because it's also tested, and it also has technical support, and now some people say it's still very good after using it.

The average "human driver has a major motor vehicle accident approximately every 10 years, or about 100-150k miles driven." Self-driving cars have been driving hundreds of thousands of miles on public roads, and there have been no reports of accidents caused by driving software. On the face of it, this seems to indicate that driverless cars are safer than drivers.

Given that most accidents are caused by drivers who are 1) impaired, 2) distracted, or 3) inexperienced, even if it turns out to be worse than a sober, focused adult driver, computers can be safer through sheer consistency. The computer will not get drunk, will not sleep, will not hit **, will not eat chili dogs, and will not be preempted.

Unfortunately, car accidents are very rare, and unless you gather millions of drivers, it's hard to study them rigorously – there is a big difference in skill and luck. Many human drivers have zero accidents in their lifetimes (more than 500,000 mountain sail miles), and many have accidents every few years. It seems likely that self-driving cars will be closer to the former than the latter, but there is not enough data to say for sure.

What we do know is that self-driving cars are tested and reviewed millions of times more thoroughly than a 16-year-old taking a driving test. Come to think of it, the threshold set by our society for a person to drive a 2-ton death machine is really low.

Nowadays, some cars have autonomous driving capabilities, butSafety on the road is still not guaranteedThis means that the autonomous driving function will remain a gimmick for a long time. <>

The autonomous driving function is a hot topic in the automotive industry in recent years, after all, the automatic driving of cars is involvedArtificial intelligenceproblems. A car company needs to master the autonomous driving function, and it must develop the corresponding AI technology in the early stage, and at the same time, it must also train its own AI robots through road tests, but most companies have not trained the robot to a relatively smart degree, and the general enterprise will also hastily train the function to commercialize, which is the inherent defect of the autonomous driving function. <>

Some cars have self-driving capabilities, in factSecurity isn't great eitherAfter all, as I said earlier, this involves problems in the field of artificial intelligence, but the inherent flaws in the process of investment will make this technology itself not so safe; At the same time, so is the autopilot functionNot permitted by lawAt least at the moment, there is no law that allows autonomous driving. Some time ago, we also saw the news that someone used the autopilot function and had a car accident, which tells us that the autopilot function is not so miraculous. <>

The emergence of a new feature needs to be slowly accepted, but this acceptance is based on the trend that the technology has gradually improved, and if the technology is not perfected and placed in the commercial market, this itself has great danger. At the same time, if the law does not allow the existence of such a function, then the existence of such a function can onlyAsDriver assistance featuresThe assisted driving function often cannot play a leading role, which should be helpful for the owner to drive. Of course, we can't kill the use of the automatic driving function with a stick, after all, this kind of function can only be used better and better if it is put into use and gradually improved.

In summary,Although some cars now have self-driving functions, because this self-driving function is not so perfect, this function is still more gimmick than practical.

The safety of the car can still be guaranteed. When the car is equipped with autonomous driving functions, the driver can free his hands and legs.

Compared with traditional self-driving cars, self-driving cars not only change driving behavior, but also change the standards and dimensions of vehicle safety and risk management. From this point of view, there is no universal answer to the question of which is safer, self-driving or self-driving. Due to the different safety standards and risk dimensions of the segments, there are huge differences in different safety or file indicators, and they cannot be generalized.

It can be seen that in the face of the challenges and problems of intellectual development, we can not only use existing standards and concepts to deal with them, but also actively learn, experience, and establish new cognitive and action strategies.

Many smart cars now have self-driving capabilities. The safety factor of the sailshirt of automatic driving is very high. However, the process of the new car also collapsed, and it cannot completely rely on self-driving driving.

Autonomous driving is not safe, as it is extremely dangerous for any driverless vehicle to be on the road without meeting safety requirements. There are various methods to attack unmanned vehicles, which penetrate into all levels of the unmanned vehicle system, including sensors, operating systems, control systems, and Internet of Vehicles communication systems. An attack on the sensor does not need to go inside the unmanned system.

This type of external attack has a relatively low technical threshold and is simple and straightforward. If you get into a driverless operating system, hackers can cause the system to crash and cause parking, or they can steal sensitive vehicle information.

Second, self-driving cars are one of the most exciting and impactful use cases for AI technology. In the United States alone, more than 35,000 people die in car accidents each year. Since self-driving cars are theoretically more responsive than human drivers and don't drink and drive, text, or get tired while driving, they should significantly improve the safety of the vehicle.

The technology is also expected to make it more independent and convenient for the elderly and others who cannot easily drive.

In addition, even if a self-driving car is equipped with a safety tester, even this cannot prevent accidents. After analyzing and studying the recorded cars, it was determined that accidents could not be avoided at that time, regardless of whether the self-driving car was driven by humans or autonomous. We want to clarify that the dead woman is a traffic violation.

We have no way of knowing the specific on-board records and details of the accident, but we have reason to believe that the driverless driver of the accident may have been wronged.

It is important to know that with the rapid development of the era of science and technology, while we are striving to obtain a motor vehicle driver's license, unmanned driving technology is also developing rapidly. Autonomous driving refers to "a driving assistance system that helps the driver control the steering, control the vehicle in the lane, and realize operations such as following, braking, and changing lanes." The driver can intervene in the control of the vehicle at any time and, in some cases, the system will also remind the driver to intervene in the control.

Autonomous driving will retain the conditions for manual driving, and the driver can freely switch between automatic and manual modes.

I think it's definitely not safe because autonomous driving doesn't react as fast as humans.

I don't think it's as safe as myself, because autonomous driving is now in its most rudimentary stage.

It's not safe. <>

First, on the one hand, autonomous driving itself is a technology with high requirements for automotive technology. The technologies used include automotive electronics technology, sensor technology, computer technology and artificial intelligence technology. Each of these four important technologies is not easy.

Because every breakthrough is facing technological innovation. The focus is on artificial intelligence technology, which requires the comparison of big data. And the best of these big data is not only based on a single data upload, but also from the data statistics of daily autonomous driving.

In fact, these statistics are still very thin compared to the huge data system. In fact, this also brings a lot of hidden dangers to autonomous driving. Therefore, the autonomous driving of some cars is still very immature from artificial intelligence data alone.

The other is in automotive electronics. We all know that today's autonomous driving relies more on the digital electronics of the car to make judgments. And the more the car relies on electronic driving technology, the more it brings great hidden dangers.

Because we understand that in fact, among the accessories of the noisy car, the electronic components are the most easily damaged. Once there is a problem with the electronic components, it will inevitably cause the misjudgment of the entire car data, which is a very unsafe factor in itself, and it also cannot guarantee 100% autonomous driving safety.

Second, on the other hand, the current market circulation of cars is uneven, but there are thousands of manufacturers above. In the face of so many manufacturers, the control of automobile quality is very different. However, these standards do not have uniform requirements, so they actually bring unsafe factors to autonomous driving.

There is another important aspect. In the face of the core technology of self-delayed combustion driving, the control of automobile manufacturers is also the same. This aspect includes the manufacturing technology of the physical components of autonomous driving, as well as the equivalent software technology, once a manufacturer fails to master the core physical manufacturing technology or fails to master the core software technology, it is actually an unsafe factor**.

The automatic driving function of some cars is not particularly safe, and the automatic driving mode of some cars still has certain drawbacks, and those who are late are easy to lose control, so that the life safety of the car owner is threatened.

It's not very safe, because the autonomous driving function is not yet mature, Naki often has self-driving vehicle accidents, and the technology is still being further improved, so the bench is not very safe.

The autonomous driving features of some cars are not yet safe, because the current technology needs to be improved and further learning is needed.

I think autonomous driving has always had its own few flaws.

A self-driving car is more like a robot, it is controlled by established programs and artificial intelligence chips, closed For all automated systems, there is always a risk of being hacked or crashed due to failures or bugs, no system is absolutely reliable, if a hacker is able to get into the car system, then it can control the car to do anything.

And based on the positioning system for automatic driving, a more fatal point is that the current stage of the Beidou system, GPS system have a certain error, may be these errors in theory on the impact of safety is not large, in practice, the car search some of the error may lead to a traffic accident.

Moreover, the operation of autonomous driving is also based on the collection of certain actual driver driving data, in order to optimize and improve the automatic driving system, the driver can not be eliminated.