-
For the first floor, I still think chrome is easy to use, why, because it's simple enough, it's not so bloated, and after all, the mobile phone is a mobile phone, and the mobile browser function can't catch up with the computer after all, and simplicity is the best, and the various functions of Firefox are how much you think you can use on the phone, so simplicity is the best Besides, chrome is known as the fastest browser, do you think Google's slogan is blowing.
-
My personal opinion is that Firefox is better, because Firefox has a few points that are currently Chrome
Under the occupation of system resources, the memory optimization is better, and the old machine is not afraid.
There are more abundant extensions, and similar extensions tend to be more mature on the Firefox platform.
The extension system is better, unlike chrome, which has serious memory usage issues.
Customizability is more powerful, unlike chrome settings that are too sketchy.
-
Some people only use one of them, so don't mislead the landlord. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no such thing as one completely defeating the other.
Installation cleanliness: Firefox is much cleaner than Chrome, and only 5 entries are written to the registry (HTM HTML association, httpclsid association, HKCR software mozilla subkey, and uninstall subkey) after setting the default browser, while Chrome writes more than 1200 items to the registry (more than 50 file associations, protocol associations, Google update associations, boot autostart items, system service items, Nearly 200 CLSIDs, system firewall rules, system DNS, system certificates, environment variables, and group policies will be changed). But fortunately, Chrome has a portable version and various shell browser modifications, which effectively avoid contamination of the registry.
Extensions: Chrome extensions are easier to use than Firefox, while Firefox extensions have a higher average quality and stability than Chrome
Speed:There's nothing to say about this,Cold start chrome is much faster than firefox,The speed of opening web pages is also chrome is a little faster,And firefox's xul cold start is too slow,Especially obvious in low-configuration machines,Only with super pre-reading and high-configuration machines can the effect of opening in seconds be achieved。
Memory usage: There is nothing to say about this, firefox opens 2 4 processes (main body, plugins-container, flash sandbox), chrome has one process per web page, naturally the resource occupation is much higher than firefox.
-
Personally, I feel that Firefox is easy to use, as long as you have enough memory, the more comfortable things are.
-
It is recommended that you use the former, which is quite easy to use!
-
Chrome, WebKit core subpages crashed, the parent program doesn't crash, which is awesome and fast.
-
If you are a heavy user of web and browser DIY, it is recommended to use Firefox, if you are a light user, then use Chrome Another: If your computer configuration is low, it is recommended to use Firefox, Chrome's multi-threading is very resource-intensive.
-
Chrome Bar The page is concise and fast, and the most important thing is that it is fast.
-
It's all good, and you have to choose it in combination with your hobbies.
Google Chrome is known as "Google Chrome" and is an open-source software. Much different from current web browsers, Google Chrome has enhanced the address bar and other features to make it easier and faster to access web pages.
Mozilla Firefox, commonly known as "Firefox" in Chinese (officially abbreviated as FX or FX
Informal abbreviation FF) is a free and open source** web browser that uses the Gecko typesetting engine and supports multiple operating systems such as Windows and Mac OS
X and GNU Linux, etc. The browser is available in two versions, the regular version and the ESR (Extended Support Release) version, which is Mozilla
Purpose-built for businesses that can't or won't upgrade every six weeks. The upgrade cycle for Firefox ESR is 42 weeks, compared to 6 weeks for regular Firefox.
Safari is a browser in Mac OS X, the latest operating system of Apple computers, which uses KDE's KHTML as the computing core of the browser.
Safari, the new browser in Mac OS X, Apple's latest operating system, was used to replace the previous Internet
KDE is used as the computing core of the browser. The browser already supports the Windows platform, but it runs on Mac OS
Some features appear to be missing compared to Safari on X. Safari is also the default browser for iOS on iPhones, iPod touches, iPads, tablets.
-
Just get used to it.
The advantage of Chrome's WeKit kernel is that web pages load quickly and there are numerous extensions. High customization. However, it occupies a large amount of resources.
The advantages of Firefox are that it has multiple answers, high practicability, and the strongest customization. That is, basically you can do whatever you want. The resource usage is not high.
When Firefox 4 comes out, the loading speed of the web page can be compared to Chrome. I've been using this for years. Because other browsers just can't get used to it.
Safari, good card, also wekit kernel has extensions, but it's basically useless. Occupies a large amount of resources. It mainly depends on personal habits.,This is a browser dedicated to the Apple system.。
-
Firefox Bai browser is an open-source, secure browser, with extremely powerful extension functions.
DAO can, can be version according to their own needs.
-
It's all called browsers, but the developers are different, and the functions are slightly different.
-
You will know if you use it yourself
-
Chrome you deserve it, it has a simple interface, no ads, and fast speeds.
-
Chrome for PC Pros: Fast speed, good compatibility, and many extensions Disadvantages: Frequent updates, because the server is blocked, it is troublesome to update, and forced updates, and memory usage is very much.
Firefox Pros: Very Extended, Powerful Cons: Not as fast and compatible as Chrome.
Safari doesn't have much of a good idea and has a single feature.
The mobile version of Chrome is compatible, fast, uses a lot of memory, and has a large volume, but the mobile version does not have extended functions.
Firefox has extended features, uses a lot of memory, and is large in size.
Safari is compatible, there are no advantages, and the function is single.
The computer uses chrome, and you can also install a Firefox.
Chrome is used for desktop mobile phones, Firefox can be installed if you have special needs, Safari or other browsers are used for iOS, and Chrome has no functions on iOS.
-
According to the length of time it has been working on the browser, Chrome has been launched late. But chrome is easier to use.
-
Safari for some reason, after a period of time, it will be very stuck (maybe I'm a case), chrome is relatively simple, and the speed is fast, but I just feel a little too simple.
Firefox is pretty good, although it doesn't feel as good as safari, but it works fine for me.
If it works properly, safari is recommended
-
Chrome is good, fast, secure, and has a simple interface.
-
Why didn't you mention opera? In fact, this is mainly a matter of personal usage habits.
Chrome is fast, the interface is concise and stable, and one page crash does not affect other pages.
Firefox seems to be very customizable, hehe, the strength is also very strong, the expansion is quite rich, and there are quite a lot of fans.
I haven't used safari much, but I haven't heard of anything brilliant about it, but it's Apple's, and the background is prominent!
While each has its merits, I recommend Chrome.
If you want, you can also play opera, people use the word "great" to describe opera, and many features in the browser are pioneered by opera.
-
Firefox has full features, few vulnerabilities, and good portability.
SLR is Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz has participated in a lot of design work, and it can be seen from the similarity between him and the SL series, but McLaren F1 is not Mercedes-Benz, at that time McLaren was an independent racing company in the United Kingdom, Mercedes-Benz did not participate in any design or production work, and now I don't know if Mercedes-Benz bought him... I can compare with him.,Eh,SL65 Black Series should be stronger than him.。。。 The SLR was supposed to be a handlebar in '03, because at the time it was said that 500 units a year would be produced in a total of 1,500 units, and then it would be discontinued this year.
Absolutely. First of all, take a company with 10,000 people as an example, in such a company, the "cattle people" in the R&D team are generally people, with amazing creativity, IQ, vision, and can creatively carry out technology development work. Modern technology pays attention to the "division of labor", and the division of labor is becoming more and more detailed. >>>More
Together with Athens, Rome and Cairo, it is known as the world's four ancient capitals, and the famous ancient city of China is (). Skin-bearer. >>>More
Dunlop is a labeling product, domestic design, production and sales, Polo is a domestic brand, the quality of the two is about the same, the price is also about the same, belongs to the low-end club. Beginners can apply it completely.
Some people like to play with handling, better power response, accurate steering, neat shifting, the so-called integration of people and vehicles, and feel that this feeling is comfortable, and there is no doubt that they choose BMW 3 Series. BMW 3 series is the king of intermediate sports, even if it is a weaker version, the dynamic response is still very good, I think it is better to go straight to the topic, since the subject is asking about the comparison between Audi A4L and BMW 3 series, it can be basically concluded that the respective version configuration of these two cars is no longer important, what matters is who has the upper hand in PK between these two brands that are basically the same level. >>>More