Debate on the big things to be subtle and to attack the problem sharply

If you don't sweep a house, how can you sweep the world.

It is true that there are many celebrities in history who have had examples of "those who have achieved great things without being informal", but what they have given up is some inherent ideas that must be abandoned, not really "small sections".The most famous, in the Hongmen banquet, Zhang Liang persuaded Liu Bang to flee without telling him halfway, so he advised him: "The big line does not care about the details, and the big gifts do not give up the small ones".

But if Xiang Yu wants to kill Liu Bang, is it a "small section" to send him to death.

Hello, how to refute the example of the other side in a debate who cites a big thing and is not informal.

Where is the boundary between big things and small sections? The phrase "those who achieve great things are not informal" is more of a bad word that instigates people to give up their ethics for the sake of interests in contradictions. It is true that there are many celebrities in history who have had examples of "those who have achieved great things are not informal", but the early limbs are given up by them, and they must give up some of the withered and inherent ideas that have not been opened, and they are not really "small sections".

The most famous, in the Hongmen banquet, Zhang Liang persuaded Liu Bang to flee without telling him halfway, so he advised him: "The big line does not care about the details, and the big gifts do not give up the small ones".But if Xiang Yu wants to kill Liu Bang, is it a "small section" to send him to death.

Sincerely answer every question for you! If you are satisfied, it is the best! If you have any questions, please keep asking!

Have a great day! Happy every day.

Summary. Big things are relative to small things, and big festivals are relative to small sections. There are big and small sections in big things, and big and small things in big things. What we are talking about today is the one who has achieved great things, so of course, the small sections in the big things must be detained, and the small sections in the small things can of course be detained.

First of all, theoretically, compared with the major section as the main contradiction, the subsection is a number of secondary contradictions in the process of the development of things, and these secondary contradictions will have a greater or lesser impact on the development of things, and some will even be transformed into major contradictions under certain conditions. Therefore, the subsection itself will have different meanings depending on the subject, the difference in the environment, and the passage of time.

Those who have achieved great things need to argue according to the three subsections, what very favorable questions can be asked?

Hello dear branches! My friend You are very welcome to use it to know, bury my liquid town is to know the answer to the master Doudou teacher!

I've seen your question about Yutong The next question will be asked by me, and it takes a little time to type a little slowly, so please be patient and wait for a while. Don't be in a hurry, thank you very much for your understanding and support, please forgive me for the inconvenience caused by the manuscript

Hello dear, it depends on whether you are positive or negative, and the specific problem is not the same.

The arguments of the counterparty are as follows.

Big things are relative to small things, and big festivals are relative to small sections. There are big and small sections in big things, and big and small things in big things. What we are talking about today is the one who has achieved great things, so of course, the small sections in the big things must be detained, and the small sections in the small things can of course be detained.

First of all, theoretically, compared with the major section as the main contradiction, the subsection is a number of secondary contradictions in the process of the development of things, and these secondary contradictions will have a greater or lesser impact on the development of things, and some of them will even be transformed into major contradictions under certain conditions. Therefore, the subsection itself will have different meanings depending on the state of the subject, the difference in the surrounding environment, and the passage of time.

I hope my answer will help you. I wish you a happy life and all the best

Finally, in reality, if a major event is achieved, it should be subject to a small section in that aspect. Of course, the premise of this sentence is that we have already detained the principles and keys in this regard. For example:

Writing**, academic level is the key, **format is a subsection, **good writing should also be eclectic and return to pure norms? When looking for a job, personal ability is the key, demeanor and clothing are subsections, and if you have strong ability, should you also be detained? When it comes to love, love is the key, whether there is a sense of humor is a subsection, and whether you love deeply can also be detached and full of joy and laughter?

That I am the three arguments of the opposing side.

Don't know if there are any questions to ask.

Hello, I suggest you give a few examples, such as Einstein's sloppiness, and ask: does success really require a summary?