For any positive integer, guess the magnitude relationship of 2 n 2 and n 2 2 and prove 10

Updated on educate 2024-03-20
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    n=1 at 2 3<3 2

    n=2 when 2 4=4 2

    n = 3 at 2 5> 5 2

    n = 4 at 2 6 > 6 2

    Therefore, suppose that when n>2, 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2 is proved by mathematical induction.

    The assumption is true when n=n.

    i.e. 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2

    then when n=n+1.

    2^(n+1+2)-(n+1+2)^2

    2*2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2-2(n+2)-12^(n+2)-2(n+2)-1

    2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2

    Hence the conjecture.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    When n=1, 2 (1+2)<(1+2) 2When n=2, 2 (2+2)=(2+2) 2 When n=3, 2 (2+3)=32>(3+2) 2=25 Conjecture 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2, proved by mathematical induction.

    When n=3, 2 (2+3)=32>(3+2) 2=25 Suppose that when n=k, 2 (k+2)>(k+2) 2 when n=k+1.

    2 (k+1+2)=2 (k+2)*2>2*(k+2) 2k+1+2) 2=(k+2) 2+1+2(k+2) (k+2) (k+2) >2-1-2(k+2)=k 2+4k+4-1-4k-4=k 2-1>0

    So 2*(k+2) 2>(k+1+2) 2 i.e. when n=k+1, 2 (k+1+2)>(k+1+2) 2, so when n>=3, 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2 is proven.

    This gives us the respect for any positive integer.

    When n=1, 2 (n+2)<(n+2) 2 When n=2, 2 (n+2)=(n+2) 2 When n>=3, 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Mathematical Induction:

    n=1 at 2 3<3 2

    n=2 when 2 4=4 2

    n = 3 at 2 5> 5 2

    n = 4 at 2 6 > 6 2

    Therefore, suppose that when n>2, 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2 is proved by mathematical induction.

    The assumption is true when n=n.

    i.e. 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2

    then when n=n+1.

    2^(n+1+2)-(n+1+2)^2

    2*2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2-2(n+2)-12^(n+2)-2(n+2)-1

    2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2

    Hence the conjecture.

    Or: make use of images.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    <> can be seen from the diagram of the upper trapped auspicious answer, the integer between -2 and 2 has ;

    Therefore, the answer to the banquet is Wang Hui.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    When n=1, 2 n-1 = 1, (n+1) 2 = 4, 2 n-1<(n+1) 2

    When n=2, 2 n-1 = 2, (n+1)2 = 9,2 n-1<(n+1) 2

    When n=3, 2 n-1 = 4, (n+1)2 = 16,2 n-1<(n+1)2

    n=4,2 n-1 = 8,(n+1)2 = 25,2 n-1<(n+1)2

    When n=5, 2 n-1 = 16, (n+1)2 = 36,2 n-1<(n+1) 2

    n=6, 2 n-1 = 32, (n+1)2 = 49,2 n-1<(n+1)2

    At n=7, 2 n-1 = 64, (n+1) 2 = 64, 2 n-1=(n+1) 2

    n=8,2 n-1 = 128,(n+1)2 = 81,2 n-1>(n+1)2

    Suppose n=k, 2 k-1>(k+1) 2

    When n=k+1, 2 k+1-1 = 2*(2 k-1).

    2*(k+1)^2 =(k+1)^2 + k+1)*(k+1)

    k+1) 2 + k*(k+1) + k+1 (because k>2).

    k+1)^2 + 2*(k+1) +1

    k+1+1)^2

    So, by mathematical induction, it is proved that when n>=8, there are 2 n-1 >(n+1) 2

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Using mathematical induction, we get (n+1) 2>2 (n-1).

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    You can start by making a table and taking the specific value of n, comparing the size of 2 n and n 2, and find that when n=1 has 2 n>n 2

    n=2 or 4 equal.

    n=3 has 2 n4 and has 2 n>n 2

    The proof can be forged by mathematical induction.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Solution: When n 3, 2 3, 2 n n

    When n 2 and n 4, 2 n n

    When n is another positive integer, 2 n n

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    There are right angles.

    And Clibi Rock 3 = Fierce B

    So for the triangle Hui Zhao.

    Yes edf= dgb

    So de bc

    So aed= c

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    2 (n-1) increases to (n+1) 2

    Fast, it is easy to see from the law of Robida in the rock. , so when n keeps increasing, 2 (n-1) must be greater than (n+1) 2When the calculator is used to test and get n to take 1 7.

    2 (n-1)=8.

    2 (n-1)>(n+1) But since you say it's a positive integer, I'll use mathematical induction to prove the following proposition: at n>=8.

    2ˆ(n-1)>(n+1)²1

    When n=8, the proposition holds 2

    The proposition is true when it is assumed that n=k.

    i.e. 2 (k-1) > (k+1).

    Then when n=k+1

    time 2*k=2*

    2*(k-1))> Caution2(k+2) 2>(k+1) 2The last inequality is good after you, and the code is respectful.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Answer: 1+2+2 2+2 3+2 4=31;

    1+2+2^2+..2 14 = 2 15-1 is maximally divisible by 31.

    Proof 1+2+2 2+.2^(5n-1)=2^(5n)-1

    32^n-1

    31+1)^n-1

    31k+1-1

    31k 1+2+2^2+..2 (5n-1) is maximally divisible by 31.

Related questions