-
n=1 at 2 3<3 2
n=2 when 2 4=4 2
n = 3 at 2 5> 5 2
n = 4 at 2 6 > 6 2
Therefore, suppose that when n>2, 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2 is proved by mathematical induction.
The assumption is true when n=n.
i.e. 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2
then when n=n+1.
2^(n+1+2)-(n+1+2)^2
2*2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2-2(n+2)-12^(n+2)-2(n+2)-1
2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2
Hence the conjecture.
-
When n=1, 2 (1+2)<(1+2) 2When n=2, 2 (2+2)=(2+2) 2 When n=3, 2 (2+3)=32>(3+2) 2=25 Conjecture 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2, proved by mathematical induction.
When n=3, 2 (2+3)=32>(3+2) 2=25 Suppose that when n=k, 2 (k+2)>(k+2) 2 when n=k+1.
2 (k+1+2)=2 (k+2)*2>2*(k+2) 2k+1+2) 2=(k+2) 2+1+2(k+2) (k+2) (k+2) >2-1-2(k+2)=k 2+4k+4-1-4k-4=k 2-1>0
So 2*(k+2) 2>(k+1+2) 2 i.e. when n=k+1, 2 (k+1+2)>(k+1+2) 2, so when n>=3, 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2 is proven.
This gives us the respect for any positive integer.
When n=1, 2 (n+2)<(n+2) 2 When n=2, 2 (n+2)=(n+2) 2 When n>=3, 2 (n+2)>(n+2) 2
-
Mathematical Induction:
n=1 at 2 3<3 2
n=2 when 2 4=4 2
n = 3 at 2 5> 5 2
n = 4 at 2 6 > 6 2
Therefore, suppose that when n>2, 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2 is proved by mathematical induction.
The assumption is true when n=n.
i.e. 2 (n 2) > (n 2) 2
then when n=n+1.
2^(n+1+2)-(n+1+2)^2
2*2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2-2(n+2)-12^(n+2)-2(n+2)-1
2^(n+2)-(n+2)^2
Hence the conjecture.
Or: make use of images.
-
<> can be seen from the diagram of the upper trapped auspicious answer, the integer between -2 and 2 has ;
Therefore, the answer to the banquet is Wang Hui.
-
When n=1, 2 n-1 = 1, (n+1) 2 = 4, 2 n-1<(n+1) 2
When n=2, 2 n-1 = 2, (n+1)2 = 9,2 n-1<(n+1) 2
When n=3, 2 n-1 = 4, (n+1)2 = 16,2 n-1<(n+1)2
n=4,2 n-1 = 8,(n+1)2 = 25,2 n-1<(n+1)2
When n=5, 2 n-1 = 16, (n+1)2 = 36,2 n-1<(n+1) 2
n=6, 2 n-1 = 32, (n+1)2 = 49,2 n-1<(n+1)2
At n=7, 2 n-1 = 64, (n+1) 2 = 64, 2 n-1=(n+1) 2
n=8,2 n-1 = 128,(n+1)2 = 81,2 n-1>(n+1)2
Suppose n=k, 2 k-1>(k+1) 2
When n=k+1, 2 k+1-1 = 2*(2 k-1).
2*(k+1)^2 =(k+1)^2 + k+1)*(k+1)
k+1) 2 + k*(k+1) + k+1 (because k>2).
k+1)^2 + 2*(k+1) +1
k+1+1)^2
So, by mathematical induction, it is proved that when n>=8, there are 2 n-1 >(n+1) 2
-
Using mathematical induction, we get (n+1) 2>2 (n-1).
-
You can start by making a table and taking the specific value of n, comparing the size of 2 n and n 2, and find that when n=1 has 2 n>n 2
n=2 or 4 equal.
n=3 has 2 n4 and has 2 n>n 2
The proof can be forged by mathematical induction.
-
Solution: When n 3, 2 3, 2 n n
When n 2 and n 4, 2 n n
When n is another positive integer, 2 n n
-
There are right angles.
And Clibi Rock 3 = Fierce B
So for the triangle Hui Zhao.
Yes edf= dgb
So de bc
So aed= c
-
2 (n-1) increases to (n+1) 2
Fast, it is easy to see from the law of Robida in the rock. , so when n keeps increasing, 2 (n-1) must be greater than (n+1) 2When the calculator is used to test and get n to take 1 7.
2 (n-1)=8.
2 (n-1)>(n+1) But since you say it's a positive integer, I'll use mathematical induction to prove the following proposition: at n>=8.
2ˆ(n-1)>(n+1)²1
When n=8, the proposition holds 2
The proposition is true when it is assumed that n=k.
i.e. 2 (k-1) > (k+1).
Then when n=k+1
time 2*k=2*
2*(k-1))> Caution2(k+2) 2>(k+1) 2The last inequality is good after you, and the code is respectful.
-
Answer: 1+2+2 2+2 3+2 4=31;
1+2+2^2+..2 14 = 2 15-1 is maximally divisible by 31.
Proof 1+2+2 2+.2^(5n-1)=2^(5n)-1
32^n-1
31+1)^n-1
31k+1-1
31k 1+2+2^2+..2 (5n-1) is maximally divisible by 31.